The Spatial Structures of Central and Eastern European cities: more European than Socialist? (original) (raw)
Related papers
The spatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities
Contributions to Economics, 2006
Central and Eastern European (CEE) cities have been under a command economy for a period varying from 45 to 75 years. During this period, the forces shaping the spatial structure of formerly socialist European cities were very different from the ones transforming their western counterparts. Densities and land allocation between different uses-mainly industrial and residential use-were not reflecting demand from consumers but were mostly based on administrative decisions. However, throughout the socialist period CEE cities have maintained their European cultural identity-defined as a prestigious center and an extensive radio-concentric transit network reinforcing the dominantly monocentric structure. In all CEE cities, land market forces are now again reshaping cities. Municipalities have often had difficulties in adopting a clear strategy between developing their suburbs to respond to demand for new housing and commercial facilities and maintaining and enhancing their historical city centers. CEE cities should adopt an urban planning strategy that, while dealing resolutely with the liabilities left by the socialist era, reflects their European culture: a strong a prestigious historical center served by transit while allowing large suburbs to develop in a way consistent with the unavoidable increase in motorization.
2005
Central and Eastern European (CEE) cities have been under a command economy for a period varying from 45 to 75 years. During this period, the forces shaping the spatial structure of formerly socialist European cities were very different from the ones transforming their western counterparts. Densities and land allocation between different uses -mainly industrial and residential use -were not reflecting demand from consumers but were mostly based on administrative decisions. However, throughout the socialist period CEE cities have maintained their European cultural identity -defined as a prestigious center and an extensive radio-concentric transit network reinforcing the dominantly monocentric structure.
Tér és Társadalom
Examining the urban sprawl around middle-size cities in Hungary and Central Europe the rural change and suburbanization can be characterized by residential out-migration from cities and at the same time by immigration from the rural areas. These processes have intensibed in the former socialist countries after the 2000s and a number of problems have not been addressed, which have become apparent during the eighties and nineties in Western countries. A fast urban sprawl took place with a low level of special control and planning but under the pressure of economic and financial development. The rate of spatial growth often exceeds the rate of population growth, it even occurs in the absence of population growth. In Central European countries, the main destination for migration is the capital cities and their suburbs, therefore suburbanisation studies focus on these areas. However, our aim is to focus on regional centres and their agglomerations, comparing them to capital cities and ru...
C.,“Changing land use dynamics in Eastern European cities,”
The objective of this work is to analyse and model urban growth dynamics of Eastern European cities and regions in the past and in the new Europe. This work is a part of the on-going research in the field of urban and regional development, carried out in the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. After the collapse of communist regimes cities and regions in Eastern and Central Europe have entered into a new phase of urbanisation, which has changed dramatically land use patterns. The liberalization of economy and the membership in the EU have led to the growing impact of the European market and EU development schemes (e.g. TEN/T, ERDF, etc.). The continuous growth of urban areas is one of the major socio-economic consequences of this development. What shapes urban sprawl will take and will it cause new threads to sustainability remains to be seen. In this paper we focus on the Dresden – Prague transport corridor in Germany and in the Czech Republic. The MOLAND urban ...
Suburbanization and sprawl in post-socialist Belgrade and Sofia
European Planning Studies
Like most European cities, cities in Southeast Europe (SEE) have been growing throughout the 20th century, however, after the end of the 1980s, the mechanisms of urban growth and expansion have changed radically: from development fully determined by central planning to market-led urban development. This paper examines how planning in large SEE cities is coping with the challenge to balance the action of the market and achieve planning goals relating to the form of urban growth and expansion. As case studies we analyse the master plans of Sofia and Belgrade and their implementation. We have two research questions: first, whether planning in the two cities has considered the role of the market when defining its objectives, measures and solutions regarding the forms of urban growth and the development of in suburban areas, and, second, whether planning has been able to influence the market or cooperate with it in order to achieve its objectives in suburban development.
Introduction to East European Cities
Eastern Europe has recently received much attention from scholars irrespective of diverse focus and specialization, and the special section of this distinguished journal is yet another proof that the region remains an extraordinarily interesting place for research and analysis. Scholarly interests have, however, often been related to the emergence, establishment and eventual demise of state socialism in this heterogeneous place, the horrors of World War II and the profound transformations that swept through its many old-new countries during recent decades. The predominance of political, social and intellectual history, as well as sociology and political science, and scholarly interpretations of the condition of modernity in Eastern Europe come therefore as little surprise. This methodological apparatus at hand, significant aspects of the region's development during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries have sometimes been overlooked, while others appeared teleological. Within t...