Review of Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India by Vinayak Chaturvedi (original) (raw)
2008, American Historical Review
An innovative and imaginative account of popular politics, one that falls short of articulating its own implications and import.
Related papers
Journal of Peasant Studies Looking, but not seeing: The state and/as class in rural India
Reasserted here is the class view of the Indian state. Because capitalism is the dominant mode of production in India, in rural areas and nationally, the state is a capitalist state and thus an agent of capitalist development. Its policies are accordingly influenced both by the dominant classes and by the lower class struggles. The fact that the Indian state has to support capitalist class relation- ships, even through the deployment of violent methods where necessary, paradoxically, prevents it from successfully addressing the agrarian question through national-level policy instruments, such as land reforms. Because of a continuing failure on the part of the state to promote development in the interest of workers and peasantry on the one hand and because of its current neoliberal policies supportive of domestic and foreign capital, this apparatus may face a legitimation crisis, especially in rural areas. Whether the potential for such a crisis will be realized depends on how the lower classes and middle peasants respond to the situation politically. And to the degree that a crisis does take shape, much will also depend on how the state responds, in particular its use of coercive power at its disposal, and how in turn lower classes respond to this.
Peasantry and Agrarian Unrest in Pre Colonial and Colonial India: Some Glimpses
isara solutions, 2018
This paper is concerned with understanding the nature of peasantry in pre-colonial India and also intends to explore the reasons for unrest in agrarian sector during colonial regime. Peasants played decisive roles in history; in the emergence of empires and also in their downfall. Peasantry, represented vital part of the civil society and enjoyed considerable degree of autonomy in pre-colonial India which started crumbling since colonial regime. Peasants are the inheritors of paradoxical identities bestowed by social scientists, writers to revolutionaries and politicians. There are debates whether Indian peasantry is capable of revolution or it is just a docile. The present paper takes into consideration these views while portraying the nature and dynamics of peasantry during pre-colonial colonial period; its vibrancy, autonomy and dynamics besides exploring the sources of agrarian unrest and structures of development during colonial regime. This paper examined the broad reasons responsible for the emergence of agrarian unrest in colonial India as conceptualized by Kathleen Gough.
Peasant Movements in Contemporary India Emerging Forms of Domination and Resistance
This paper examines ways in which peasant movements transform, institutionalise themselves, forge new collective identities and articulate new strategies to ensure peasant survival and resistance against domination in contemporary India. Focusing on four villages that were witness to the Tebhaga, Telangana and the Naxalite movements it sociologically analyses the socio-economic status of the peasantry, nature of their participation in those movements and processes of articulation of resistance against the emerging structure of domination in the wider state-level context.
During 1998-99 an upsurge of interest and activism was observed among the leaders of political parties of West Bengal to celebrate the 200 years of an adivasi revolt, popularly known as ‘Chuar Rebellion’. The grandeur with which the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Congress Party came out in the public domain clearly revealed that Bharatya Janata Party is not the only political party in India who tries to use history for present political benefit. The so-called ‘Chuar’ or ‘Paik’ rebellion which spread over the vast forest covered tracts of South-West Bengal and parts of present Jharkhand during the second half of eighteenth century was made an apparently non-political agenda by the political parties of West Bengal. Large public meetings and seminars were addressed by the leaders of Congress and CPI (M) who hardly had any competence to carry out substantial discussions based on authentic historical research on the rebellion which was basically an armed agrarian revolt against the exploitative revenue policy of the colonial rulers. It is interesting to note that the political leaders had picked up this particular rebellion not to conduct serious research on the different dimensions of this pioneering agrarian revolt, which took place long before the Santal Rebellion but to associate themselves symbolically with the heroic struggles of the down-trodden and the toiling masses of the countryside who were exploited, oppressed and finally brutally exterminated by the colonial rulers. The ‘Paik Rebellion’ took place in two distinct phases, first during 1766-83 and the second between 1798-99. Taking cues from the works of Abner Cohen and Marc Abeles this study makes attempt to construct an ethnography of political symbolism by describing in some detail the tour programmes and speeches of the political leaders and the discourse generated by the print media on the occasion of the celebration of the peasant revolt.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.