Keeping Community, Challenging Boundaries: Indigenous Migrants, Internationalist Workers and Mexican Revolutionaries, 1900-1920, in John Tutino,ed. ed. ed Mexico and Mexicans in the History and Culture of the United States, (Austin: University of Texas press, 2012) 208-235. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Abstract. This essay explores the history of the political structure of town and municipal authority in a specific case study of a Yucatec Maya community. The town is Pisté, a community that has become a significant tourist center that provides services for the nearby archaeological and tourist site of Chichén Itzá. A descriptive history of the town, mostly based in secondary literature and key primary sources from archives, is presented with two goals in mind. The first objective is to address ethnographically specific questions regarding the politics of this community, including the 1989 attempt to redefine itself as a ‘‘new’’ county according to Mexico’s 1917 Revolutionary Constitution. The second objective is to raise questions and broader issues regarding new social movements, state formation analyzed from the ‘‘bottom-up,’’ the importance of the authority structure of the town/county as a governmental strategy of theMexican state, and the ethnographic and historical study of the 1980s’ crises in Yucatán. The case study contributes to Yucatec studies by pointing attention away from the political-economic core of Mérida, the usual institutions (church, hacienda, and highly capitalized economic sectors), and typical topics (e.g., party politics, elite factionalism) that have been the focus of Yucatec historiography. By directing attention to areas (communities in the milpa zone) and topics (the political and cultural forms of rural communities) that have been marginalized by Yucatec historians but that have been a favored topic of U.S.-based cultural anthropologists seeking idealized Maya culture, this essay raises new research questions for which yet another rapprochement is necessary in Yucatec studies between the fields of history and cultural ethnography.
Contemporay Social Movements in Mexico
Social Movements 1768-2018, 2020
Guerrero has a history of poverty and repression, but also of resistance, where the students and teachers of Ayotzinapa have been in the forefront. The Ayotzinapa movement draws on the history of the teachers’ colleges, which have existed in the state since the 1920s. These colleges were founded by Minister of Public Education José Vasconcelos, with the goal of educating peasants living in Mexico’s countryside (Padilla 2009). Since their founding, these schools have a socialist and activist orientation and are active in the peasants’ struggles for land distribution. However, they lost much of their funding from the federal government since the switch over to a neoliberal economic model in the 1980s. Protests led by young adults and students in Mexico have gained significant attention in recent years. This chapter looks at the origins of these movements, which were influenced by political corruption and the war on drugs. In particular, the formation of the student-led group #YoSoy132 against presidential candidate Enrique Peña Nieto, and the kidnapping and disappearance of 43 students. The students’ kidnapping led to a series of contentious events assigning blame on the federal government. The use of social media helped garner not just awareness, but support beyond Mexico’s borders. Whether or not this qualifies as a social movement under Charles Tilly’s terms shall be determined after a brief analysis of the events.
The Rise of Social Movements Among Migrant Workers. Uncertain strivings for autonomy
China perpectives, 2005
The reforms brought with them the Party's retreat from certain social and economic spheres, and what was once claimed as identical interests between the Party-state, the working people and the enterprise administrators vanished. As Dorothy J. Solinger puts it in a recent paper: the three parties, "once supposed allies, have become mutually antagonistic" 1. The economic reforms hence enabled the emergence of a new space where social, economic and political actors have a chance to push for their interests thanks to new conditions of bargaining as well as new alliances. According to Charles Tilly, "social movements contribute to the creation of a public space-social settings, separate both from governing institutions and from organizations devoted to production or reproduction, in which consequential deliberation over public affairs takes place-as well as sometimes contributing to transfers of power over states" 2. Peasants were the first among the Chinese population to be put on the move by the economic reforms: transient, no longer belonging to rural society and lacking residency status in the urban area where they work, while more immune to social control they are also denied full citizenship rights. This situation changed in 2002-2003 when the central government, aware both of the necessity to acknowledge migrant workers' economic contribution and afraid of growing social instability, started to call for the protection of their "legal rights". However, as the state is trying to regain migrant workers' confidence in an attempt to reassert its legitimacy, some migrants now want autonomy. They are supported by social organisations willing to fill the gap created by an unsupportive Party or to provide some redress against an oppressive system. This situation recalls the definition of social movements as "a network of informal interactions between a plurality of individuals, groups and/or organizations" 3. As Tilly reminds us, a social movement is not a group of a particular sort, "nor do social movements undergo natural histories" 4 with a starting point, a middle and an end. They are rather defined as historically specific clusters of political performances. The aim of this article is to determine why the social movements that have recently