The influence of prenatal breech presentation on neonatal leg posture (original) (raw)
Related papers
Fetal leg posture in uncomplicated breech and cephalic pregnancies
European Journal of Pediatrics, 2009
Background The objective of our study was to determine differences in prenatal leg posture development between breech and cephalic-born babies. Materials and methods Ten healthy fetuses in breech and ten healthy fetuses in cephalic presentation were observed by means of weekly ultrasounds from 33 weeks gestational age until birth to assess leg posture. Results The breech fetuses showed a clear preference for an extended leg position; they spent significantly more time with their knees in extension than the cephalic fetuses (p<0.001). The cephalic fetuses showed significantly more leg-crossing than the breech fetuses (p<0.01). For both findings, no significant change over time could be observed in either group. Conclusion These findings show that the intra-uterine position does influence the fetal postural and motor development. However, it seems unlikely that intra-uterine movement restriction can solely be held accountable for the observed differences in leg position between breech and cephalic fetuses.
The effect of intra-uterine breech position on postnatal motor functions of the lower limbs
Early human …, 1993
The effect of intra-uterine movement restriction on the development of motor functions was studied longitudinally by comparing infants born after uncomplicated breech position (n = 13) with control infants (vertex position, n = 5-10). Before birth, fetal leg posture was studied at regular intervals by means of real time ultrasound observations, and classified as complete (n = l), inconsistent (n = 6), or incomplete (n = 6) breech position. Limited extension of the hips, preference posture and joint position in percentage of time (each until 12 weeks), withdrawal reflex and magnet response (until 26 weeks) and posture while sitting, standing and walking without support (up to 12-18 months) were assessed longitudinally. The results showed statistically significant, positive relationships between intra-uterine breech position and neonatal limited extension of the hip-joint, between limited extension of the hip-joint and the percentage of time that the hips are in flexion during the first 12 weeks, between this flexion of the hips (in percentage of time) and an abnormally 'flexed' walking pattern at 12-18 months, and finally, between a positive magnet response at 6 months and an abnormal walking pattern at 12-18 months. These findings suggest that intra-uterine movement restriction of the legs can cause long term alterations in the development of motor functions (leg posture, reflexes and posture while walking), possibly mediated by alterations in proprioceptive feedback mechanisms.
Is there an effect of prenatal breech position on locomotion at 2.5 years?
Early Human Development, 2008
The long-term effects of intra-uterine breech position on postnatal development of motor functions have not been systematically investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible effect of prenatal breech position on locomotion. Two complementary studies were conducted. Firstly, a gait analysis was carried out. Secondly, in a functional task the children were challenged to cross a gap until their maximum attainable crossing distance was reached. The mean age of the twenty-one children who participated in this study was 32.1 months (SD = 4). Children who lied in prenatal breech position (n=10) had a walking pattern comparable to the control group (n =11). There were no differences in step length, step width, foot rotation, foot rotation asymmetry, hip flexion, hip extension and range of motion of the hip. Thus, prenatal breech position, although a long-term effect was found, does not seem to have functional consequences on locomotion. However, the total amount of extra hip motion during the gap crossing was significantly smaller in children who lied in breech position compared to the control group. This was due to significant less extra hip flexion at the side of the leading leg. Nevertheless, comparable maximum gaps were crossed in both groups. Apparently, these children had a different solution of the challenging task of gap crossing. They compensated the lack of extra hip flexion by applying more extra hip extension. a v a i l a b l e a t w w w. s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / e a r l h u m d e v Early Human Development (2008) 84, 211-216
Effect of intervention on development of hip posture in very preterm babies
Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
Preterm babies are physiologically hypotonic, which causes their posture to be flattened when lying in the prone position. This flattened posture may persist beyond term. In a prospective, randomised, controlied, double blind trial of postural support carried out on 45 babies born at less than 33 weeks of gestation, we showed that infants positioned with specific hip support during the period of intensive care had significantly fewer features of flattened posture at the age equivalent to term.
Early Human Development, 2009
Aim: To investigate differences between the infants born in occipital and breech presentation relative to the passive and active motility. Method: A prospective study was conducted in the period from 2006 to 2007 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Novi Sad. Subjects were 50 breech-presenting and 87 occipital-presenting term newborns delivered by elective cesarean section following a regular course of pregnancy, without fetal, newborn, and the pregnant female disease. Outcome measures were popliteal angle; extension of the hip-joint; ventral flexion and dorsal extension in the axis; spontaneous displacement; crawling reflex; righting reaction in vertical and sitting positions; righting reaction in horizontal suspension, the automatic walking investigated on the second and fourth day of life. Results: Except for righting reaction in horizontal suspension, the newborns from breech presentation had a significantly lower score for all investigated parameters of active movements at the first and second examination. There was no difference between occipital and breech-group relative to the ventral flexion and dorsal extension in the axis. The popliteal angle was significantly increased, whereas the extension in the hip joint was significantly decreased in the breech group. Conclusions: Investigations showed a significantly decreased expression of active movements in the breech group, which cannot be explained only by postural deformities.
Fetal kicking and movements generate biomechanical stimulation in the fetal skeleton, which is important for prenatal musculoskeletal development, particularly joint shape. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common joint shape abnormality at birth, with many risk factors for the condition being associated with restricted fetal movement. In this study, we investigate the biomechanics of fetal movements in such situations, namely fetal breech position, oligohydramnios and primiparity (firstborn pregnancy). We also investigate twin pregnancies, which are not at greater risk of DDH incidence, despite the more restricted intra-uterine environment. We track fetal movements for each of these situations using cine-MRI technology, quantify the kick and muscle forces, and characterise the resulting stress and strain in the hip joint, testing the hypothesis that altered biomechanical stimuli may explain the link between certain intra-uterine conditions and risk of DDH. Kick force, stress and strain were found to be significantly lower in cases of breech position and oligohydramnios. Similarly, firstborn fetuses were found to generate significantly lower kick forces than non-firstborns. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in twins compared to singletons. This research represents the first evidence of a link between the biomechanics of fetal movements and the risk of DDH, potentially informing the development of future preventative measures and enhanced diagnosis. Our results emphasise the importance of ultrasound screening for breech position and oligohydramnios, particularly later in pregnancy, and suggest that earlier intervention to correct breech position through external cephalic version could reduce the risk of hip dysplasia.
Influence of breech presentation on the development of fetal arm posture
Early Human Development, 2005
Background: In previous research, an age-related developmental trend towards increasing arm flexion has been found for cephalic fetuses. Aim: To determine if the development of arm posture in breech fetuses is comparable to that of cephalic ones. Subjects and methods: Fetal arm posture was studied longitudinally by means of real-time ultrasound in 13 healthy breech and 10 healthy cephalic fetuses. Observations started from 33 weeks gestational age until birth and were performed weekly in the breech group and every 2 weeks in the cephalic group. Results: No difference could be found in arm posture between the left and the right arm in either group. Both breech and cephalic fetuses showed a clear preference for flexion in elbow and finger joints at all studied ages. After 36 weeks gestational age, the breech group showed significantly less wrist flexion when compared to the cephalic group (p=0.037). A clear preference for location of the fetal hands near the fetal head could be observed for both groups. Conclusions: As there is no evidence for an abnormal neuromotor development in healthy breech fetuses, the observed difference in wrist flexion is probably due to differences in intrauterine environment. Because of the preference for location of the hands in the vicinity of the fetal head, breech fetuses probably experience a less
Journal of Biomechanics, 2018
Fetal kicking and movements generate biomechanical stimulation in the fetal skeleton, which is important for prenatal musculoskeletal development, particularly joint shape. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common joint shape abnormality at birth, with many risk factors for the condition being associated with restricted fetal movement. In this study, we investigate the biomechanics of fetal movements in such situations, namely fetal breech position, oligohydramnios and primiparity (firstborn pregnancy). We also investigate twin pregnancies, which are not at greater risk of DDH incidence, despite the more restricted intra-uterine environment. We track fetal movements for each of these situations using cine-MRI technology, quantify the kick and muscle forces, and characterise the resulting stress and strain in the hip joint, testing the hypothesis that altered biomechanical stimuli may explain the link between certain intra-uterine conditions and risk of DDH. Kick force, stress and strain were found to be significantly lower in cases of breech position and oligohydramnios. Similarly, firstborn fetuses were found to generate significantly lower kick forces than non-firstborns. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in twins compared to singletons. This research represents the first evidence of a link between the biomechanics of fetal movements and the risk of DDH, potentially informing the development of future preventative measures and enhanced diagnosis. Our results emphasise the importance of ultrasound screening for breech position and oligohydramnios, particularly later in pregnancy, and suggest that earlier intervention to correct breech position through external cephalic version could reduce the risk of hip dysplasia.
Development of human hip joint in the second and the third trimester of pregnancy; a cadaveric study
BMC Developmental Biology, 2013
Background: The purpose of the study was an evaluation of fetal hip joint morphology during the second and the third trimester of pregnancy. Serial sections were performed on 23 cadaver infants. Results: The mean lunar age was 6.6 months. Femoral shaft length (FSL) and width of the proximal and distal epiphysis were x-rayed to determine fetal age. The neck shaft angle (NSA), the femoral antetorsion angle (FAA), the acetabulum anteversion angle (AAA) and the acetabulum slope angle (ASA) were measured. Hip development ratios were plotted for all cadaveric species and revealed: flat FSL/NSA slope pattern, upward FSL/FAA slope pattern and downward slope pattern for FSL/ASA and FSL/AAA ratios. The changes, observed during the developmental period, were not statistically significant. NSA did not change during the second or the third pregnancy trimester. FAA increased during pregnancy but the changes were not statistically significant. AA, as well as ASA, showed a decreasing trend during the second and the third pregnancy trimester, however, with no correlations to age. Conclusion: Despite an increasing depth and growing dimensions of the acetabulum in the uterus, its orientation does not change in any significant way.
Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in preterm infants with maternal risk factors
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2013
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in preterm infants with maternal risk factors. A prospective review of the medical records and ultrasound (US) scans of all preterm infants at one tertiary-care children&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;s hospital was completed to identify all premature infants without any infantile risk factors at a particular time frame. We consecutively evaluated 421 babies (842 hips) who satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Hip US images were classified according to Graf. Overall, one hip was diagnosed as DDH (Graf type 2c). Female infants had significantly lower alpha angles (70.2 ± 6.6 and 71.4 ± 4.4 for females and males, respectively) (P = 0.033). There was no correlation between oligohydramnios and alpha and beta angles and hip sides (P = 0.345 and P = 0.789 for left and right hips, respectively). US examination of the infants revealed no differences between the alpha and beta angles of the hips and birth weight and age at gestation. Although it was statistically not significant, US evaluation of left hips among singletons demonstrated one immature hip (P = 0.864) and that of right hips demonstrated one immature hip for both singletons and twins (P = 0.904). Prematurity with or without maternal risk factors does not have an effect on DDH.