Laparosopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse (original) (raw)
Related papers
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Background: Post hysterectomy vault prolapse is a progressive herniation of the vaginal vault through the urogenital diaphragm and commonly leads to per vaginal bulge. Surgically, vault prolapse is corrected by sacrocolpopexy which can be done both as an open abdominal surgery and as a laparoscopic repair. Aims and Objectives: This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacies of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Materials and Methods: This study includes 50 cases of vault prolapsed who underwent hysterectomy previously, admitted in our institution and operated during January 2021–June 2022 for a period of 18 months with both open abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. We compared the basic characteristics, duration of surgery, post-operative stay, post-operative complications, and patient satisfaction between open and laparoscopic groups. Results: No significant difference was observed between the characteristics of the patients in the abdominal-approach gr...
The American journal of …, 2004
Transabdominal sacrocolpopexy is an excellent treatment option for patients with high-grade vaginal vault prolapse, with long-term success rates ranging from 93% to 99%. However, it is associated with increased morbidity compared with vaginal repairs. In this article, we describe a novel minimally invasive technique of vaginal vault prolapse repair and present our initial experience. The surgical technique involves placement of 4 laparoscopic ports, 3 for the surgical robot and 1 for the assistant. A prolene mesh is then attached to the sacral promontory and to the vaginal apex using nonabsorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. At the end of the case, the mesh material is covered by the peritoneum. A total of 20 patients underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at our institution in the past 18 months for severe symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse; 8 of the 20 (40%) underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure. Mean follow-up was 5.1 (range, 1-12) months and mean age was 66 (range, 47-82) years. The mean total operative time was 3.2 (range, 2.25-4.75) hours. Of these patients, 1 was converted to an open procedure secondary to unfavorable anatomy. All but 1 patient, who left on postoperative day 2, were discharged from the hospital after an overnight stay. Complications were limited to mild port-site infections in 2 patients, which resolved with oral antibiotic therapy. Recurrent grade 3 rectocele developed in 1 patient, but there was no evidence of cystocele or enterocele. Significant incontinence (Ͼ1 pad/day) was present in 2 patients. All 18 patients reported being satisfied with the outcome of their surgery and all 10 would recommend it to a friend. This novel technique for vaginal vault prolapse repair combines the advantages of open sacrocolpopexy with the decreased morbidity and improved cosmesis of laparoscopic surgery. It is associated with decreased hospital stay, low complication and conversion rates, and high rates of patient satisfaction. Although our early experience is encouraging, long-term data are needed to confirm these findings and establish longevity of the repair.
Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2023
Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures during lifetime. Almost 10 % of women who have had a hysterectomy because of prolapse symptoms, will visit a gynaecologist for a surgical correction of a vaginal vault prolapse thereafter. Vaginal vault prolapse can be corrected by many different surgical procedures. A Cochrane review comparing abdominal sacrocolpopexy to vaginal sacrospinous fixation considered the open abdominal procedure as the treatment of first choice for prolapse of the vaginal vault, although operation time and hospital stay is longer. Literature also shows that hospital stay and blood loss are less after a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared to the abdominal technique. To date, it is unclear which of these techniques leads to the best operative result and the highest patient satisfaction. Prospective trials comparing vaginal sacrospinous fixation and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy are lacking. The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the disease specific quality of life of the vaginal sacrospinous fixation and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Methods: We will perform a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. Women with a post-hysterectomy symptomatic, POP-Q stage ≥2, vaginal vault prolapse will be included. Participants will be randomized to the vaginal sacrospinous fixation group or the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy group. Primary outcome is disease specific quality of life at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcome will be the effect of the surgical treatment on prolapse related symptoms, sexual functioning, procedure related morbidity, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, anatomical results using the POP-Q classification after one and 5 years follow-up, type and number of re-interventions, costs and cost-effectiveness. Analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle and not as a per protocol analysis. With a power of 90% and a level of 0.05, the calculated sample size necessary is 96 patients. Taking into account 10% attrition, a number of 106 patients (53 in each arm) will be included. Discussion: The SALTO-2 trial is a randomized controlled multicentre trial to evaluate whether the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous fixation is the first-choice surgical treatment in patients with a stage ≥2 vault prolapse.
BMC Women's Health
Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures during lifetime. Almost 10 % of women who have had a hysterectomy because of prolapse symptoms, will visit a gynaecologist for a surgical correction of a vaginal vault prolapse thereafter. Vaginal vault prolapse can be corrected by many different surgical procedures. A Cochrane review comparing abdominal sacrocolpopexy to vaginal sacrospinous fixation considered the open abdominal procedure as the treatment of first choice for prolapse of the vaginal vault, although operation time and hospital stay is longer. Literature also shows that hospital stay and blood loss are less after a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared to the abdominal technique. To date, it is unclear which of these techniques leads to the best operative result and the highest patient satisfaction. Prospective trials comparing vaginal sacrospinous fixation and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy are lacking. The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the disease specific quality of life of the vaginal sacrospinous fixation and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Methods: We will perform a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. Women with a post-hysterectomy symptomatic, POP-Q stage ≥2, vaginal vault prolapse will be included. Participants will be randomized to the vaginal sacrospinous fixation group or the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy group. Primary outcome is disease specific quality of life at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcome will be the effect of the surgical treatment on prolapse related symptoms, sexual functioning, procedure related morbidity, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, anatomical results using the POP-Q classification after one and 5 years follow-up, type and number of re-interventions, costs and cost-effectiveness. Analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle and not as a per protocol analysis. With a power of 90% and a level of 0.05, the calculated sample size necessary is 96 patients. Taking into account 10% attrition, a number of 106 patients (53 in each arm) will be included. Discussion: The SALTO-2 trial is a randomized controlled multicentre trial to evaluate whether the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous fixation is the first-choice surgical treatment in patients with a stage ≥2 vault prolapse.
The World Clinics Journal of Medical Sciences, 2017
he surgical repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) includes vaginal and abdominal approaches. 1 The vaginal approaches are lessmorbid than abdominal approaches.However, abdominal approaches provides lower recurrence rates and less dysparenuia than vaginal approaches. 2 Today, sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard procedure for apical POP repair. 1,2 The procedure that can be performed by abdominally (ASC), or minimally invasively (MISC), provides excellent anatomical and functional outcomes. 2 Since vaginal vault prolapses occured more rarely, the number of studies including MISCs are rare. 3 Herein we report our experience with abdominal and minimally invasive approaches of the sacrocolpopexy. In addition, we present the demographic, peri-and postoperative outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS SUBJECTS A total of 41 consecutive women who were diagnosed with POP and underwent a sacrocolpopexy operation (21 ASC, 20 MISC) were included in
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy - A Retrospective Study
BJSTR, 2017
Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapsed is a common complication following different types of hysterectomy which can lead to significant urinary, anorectal and sexual impairment in the patients. Pre existing pelvic floor defect is the most important predicting factor in the future development of vaginal vault prolapse. Preventive measures can be taken intraoperatively to reduce the incidence of later development of vault prolapse but the possibility cannot be eliminated completely. Both vaginal and abdominal approaches have been advocated for the correction of vault prolapse. With the abdominal approach, the results are better and recurrence is less. However, recovery time is more and the procedure requires a lot of bowel manipulation. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can circumvent the disadvantages of open abdominal approach while retaining its advantages of great patient satisfaction and less recurrence. Being a minimally invasive procedure, lap sacrocolpopexy allows for less blood loss and speedy recovery. Here, we present a retrospective analysis of 25 cases of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy over 2 years.
International Urogynecology Journal
Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to evaluate the functional outcome after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open sacrocolpopexy in women with vault prolapse. Methods A multicentre randomised controlled trial was carried out at four teaching and two university hospitals in the Netherlands in women with symptomatic vault prolapse requiring surgical treatment. Participants were randomised for laparoscopic or open sacrocolpopexy. Primary outcome was disease-specific quality of life measured using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI) questionnaire at 12 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes included anatomical outcome and perioperative data. We needed 74 participants to show a difference of 10 points on the prolapse domain of the UDI 12 months after surgery (power of 80%, α error 0.05). Results Between 2007 and 2012, a total of 74 women were randomised. Follow-up after 12 months showed no significant differences in domain scores of the UDI between the two groups. After 12 months, both groups reported a UDI score of 0.0 (IQR: 0-0) for the domain Bgenital prolapse^, which was the primary outcome. There were no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.93). The number of severe complications was 4 in the laparoscopic group versus 7 in the open abdominal group (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.50-2.27). There was less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay after laparoscopy; 2 (IQR 2-3) versus 4 (IQR 3-5) days, which was statistically different. There was no significant difference in anatomical outcome at 12 months. Conclusion Our trial provides evidence to support a laparoscopic approach when performing sacrocolpopexy, as there was less blood loss and hospital stay was shorter, whereas functional and anatomical outcome were not statistically different.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
BACKGROUND: There are many surgical procedures to treat posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Abdominal sacral colpopexy is one of these procedures. The aim of this study was to review the cases of 85 consecutive patients treated by this technique since 1978 by the same surgical team using the same procedure. Our surgical procedure will be explained. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-five patients were treated in our department between 1978 and 1998 for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. The mean age was 55.42 years. The mean weight was 63.37 kg. Their parity ranged from 0 to 5 (mean, 2.54). The interval of time between hysterectomy and vaginal vault prolapse repair ranged from 1 to 37 years (mean, 17.92 years). The main indication for hysterectomy was uterine leiomyomas. Of these patients, 67.05% had stress urinary incontinence, and mean urethral closure pressure was 48.7 cm H 2 O. All patients had abdominal sacral colpopexy associated with a Burch procedure and a posterior perineal repair. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had postoperative fever. Twenty-two had urinary tract infections. Two patients had to undergo blood transfusion. Three patients had postoperative urinary retention. The median longterm followup was 10.5 years; 27.05% of patients had relapsing stress urinary incontinence. Two patients had a relapse of the vaginal vault prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: The abdominal sacral colpopexy is a safe operation with low morbidity and long-standing good results. It can be recommended for sexually active women. Nevertheless, the Burch procedure performed with this operation failed to prevent recurrence of urinary incontinence.