Eustratios of Nicaea: a Hithertho Unknown 'Master of Rhetors' in Late Eleventh-Century (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Reception of Greek Ethics in Late Antiquity and Byzantium, 2021
The eleventh to twelfth-century theologian and philosopher Eustratios of Nicaea authored commentaries on books 1 and 6 of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. In this paper I show the extent to which Eustratios is indebted to the ancient commentary tradition as well as how he departed from the earlier model of commentary in order to answer contemporary questions of meaning. In order to do so I discuss Eustratios' hermeneutics and textual approach, its dependence upon the ancient model and its novelties in detail. I argue that Eustratios provided a fundamental contribution to the formation of a specifically Byzantine commentary tradition. Finally, this paper also investigates the historical circumstances of Eustratios' career as a commentator and highlights how Eustratios' literary and philosophical output reflects on his patron, the princess and historian Anna komnena.
Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum – Journal of Ancient Christianity 16 (2012) 181-225
The present article offers the edition, accompanied by an English translation, of a Coptic homily on the Cross and the Good Thief (CPG 2622; clavis coptica 0395) attributed to Theophilus of Alexandria. The edition is based on the Pierpont Morgan codex M595, ff. 141ro-148ro, a 9th century parchment codex, which belonged to the Monastery of the Archangel Michael, situated near Hamuli in the Fayyum oasis. The critical apparatus records the variant readings of the three other surviving manuscripts of Ps.-Theophilus’ sermon. The introduction contains the description of the manuscripts, as well as a commentary which links the sermon on the Cross and the Good Thief by Ps.-Theophilus to the Patristic exegetical tradition. Literary connections between the long hymn to the Cross, which appears in the text edited here, and similar material in the pseudo-Chrysostomic work In venerabilem crucem sermo (CPG 4525) are also pointed out.
reference-global.com (Millennium, vol.6), 2009
This article explores in detail the downfalls of the patriarchs of Constantinople Euphemius (in 496) and Macedonius (in 511). It argues that the Emperor Anastasius (491-518) was obliged to outmanoeuvre both patriarchs in order to re-establish control in a predominantly pro-Chalcedonian city. In a detailed investigation of the events surrounding Macedonius’ downfall in July 511 it brings to bear hitherto neglected Coptic translations of letters by Severus to bishop Soterichus of Caesarea, offering a new edition of one and a new translation of both. It concludes with some observations about the relationship between the emperor and the patriarch in the imperial capital in late antiquity generally, stressing the steadily rising influence of the latter.