Transfer of the teres minor motor branch for triceps reinnervation in tetraplegia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Microsurgery, 2011
In spinal cord injuries at the C6 level, elbow extension is lost and needs reconstruction. Traditionally, elbow extension has been reconstructed by muscle transfers, which improve function only moderately. We have hypothesized that outcomes could be ameliorated by nerve transfers rather than muscle transfers. We anatomically investigated nerve branches to the teres minor and posterior deltoid as donors for transfer to triceps motor branches. In eight formalin-fixed cadavers, the axillary nerve, the teres minor branch, the posterior deltoid branch, the triceps long and upper medial head motor branches, and the thoracodorsal nerve were dissected bilaterally, their diameters measured and their myelinated fibers counted. To simulate surgery, using an axillary approach in two fresh cadavers, we transferred the teres minor or the posterior deltoid branch to the triceps long head and to the thoracodorsal nerve. The posterior division of the axillary nerve gave off the teres minor motor branch and then the branch to the posterior deltoid, terminating as the superior lateral brachial cutaneous nerve. The diameters of the teres minor motor branch, posterior deltoid, triceps long and upper medial head branches, and the thoracodorsal nerve all were 2 mm, with minimal variation. The nerves varied little in their numbers of myelinated fibers, being consistently about 1,000. Via an axillary approach, either the teres minor or the posterior deltoid branch could be transferred directly to the thoracodorsal nerve or to triceps branches without any tension.
The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2012
We undertook a brachialis to triceps nerve transfer to restore elbow extension in a 53-yearold man 5 months after he sustained a spine injury that resulted in a central cord syndrome. Within 3 months of surgery, the patient had recovered active elbow extension and had M3 level strength, which increased to M4 and 5 kg of strength by 12 months postoperatively. Despite transferring an antagonist nerve for triceps reinnervation, the patient had no problems controlling active elbow flexion-extension. Harvesting the brachialis nerve caused no permanent decrease in elbow flexion strength
Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 2020
Introduction In individuals with tetraplegia, elbow extension is critical for overhead activities, weight shifting, independent transfers, and to perform self-care tasks such as eating. At present, restoration of elbow extension in tetraplegic patients can be performed using either tendon or nerve transfers. Each procedure presents several advantages and limitations that must be discussed with the potential surgical candidate, based on remaining muscular functions and functional goals. Case presentation We propose a novel combined technique of both tendon and nerve transfer to restore active elbow extension by transferring the posterior deltoid tendon to the triceps tendon and the branch of teres minor nerve to the long head of the triceps nerve. Techniques were performed from the same shoulder posterior surgical approach. Discussion This surgical technique can add the benefits of each tendon and nerve transfer, leading to a reduction of failure rates, with more predictable outcomes.
Nerve transfers in tetraplegia I: Background and technique
Surgical Neurology International, 2011
Background: The recovery of hand function is consistently rated as the highest priority for persons with tetraplegia. Recovering even partial arm and hand function can have an enormous impact on independence and quality of life of an individual. Currently, tendon transfers are the accepted modality for improving hand function. In this procedure, the distal end of a functional muscle is cut and reattached at the insertion site of a nonfunctional muscle. The tendon transfer sacrifices the function at a lesser location to provide function at a more important location. Nerve transfers are conceptually similar to tendon transfers and involve cutting and connecting a healthy but less critical nerve to a more important but paralyzed nerve to restore its function. Methods: We present a case of a 28-year-old patient with a C5-level ASIA B (international classification level 1) injury who underwent nerve transfers to restore arm and hand function. Intact peripheral innervation was confirmed in the paralyzed muscle groups corresponding to finger flexors and extensors, wrist flexors and extensors, and triceps bilaterally. Volitional control and good strength were present in the biceps and brachialis muscles, the deltoid, and the trapezius. The patient underwent nerve transfers to restore finger flexion and extension, wrist flexion and extension, and elbow extension. Intraoperative motor-evoked potentials and direct nerve stimulation were used to identify donor and recipient nerve branches. Results: The patient tolerated the procedure well, with a preserved function in both elbow flexion and shoulder abduction. Conclusions: Nerve transfers are a technically feasible means of restoring the upper extremity function in tetraplegia in cases that may not be amenable to tendon transfers.
Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2016
In tetraplegia patients, activities of daily living are highly dependent on the remaining upper limb functions. In other countries, upper limb reconstruction surgery to improve function has been applied to diverse cases, but few cases have been reported in Korea. The current authors experienced a case of posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfer and rehabilitation in a complete spinal cord injury with a C6 neurologic level, and we introduce the case-a 36-year-old man-with a literature review. The patient's muscle strength in C5 C6 muscles were normal, but C7 muscles were trace, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) score was 24. The tendon of the posterior deltoid was transferred to the triceps brachii muscle, and then the patient received comprehensive rehabilitative treatment. His C7 muscle strength in the right upper extremity was enhanced from trace to fair, and his SCIM III score improved to 29.
The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2016
Purpose With spinal cord injuries, muscles below the level of the lesion remain innervated despite the absence of volitional control. This persistent innervation protects against denervation atrophy and may allow for nerve transfers to treat long-standing lesions within the spinal cord. We tested the hypothesis that in chronic spinal cord lesions, muscles remained viable for reinnervation. Methods To test this hypothesis, we operated on 7 patients with tetraplegia to reconstruct thumb and finger extension after a mean interval of 5 years since injury. During surgery, if electrical stimulation of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) produced muscle contraction, the nerve to the supinator (NS) was transferred to the PIN. If no contractions were demonstrated, the muscles of the extensor compartment of the forearm were replaced via a free gracilis transfer with innervation supplied by the NS. Results After an average of 26 months, M3 recovery of thumb and finger extension was observed in the 3 upper limbs from the 2 youngest patients who underwent a nerve transfer. None of the free gracilis-treated patients achieved scores above M2. Conclusions In our youngest patients aged 27 and 34 years, who were operated on 6 years after spinal cord injury, transfer of the NS to the PIN partially restored hand span.