Claudio's fractured views and superficial "critique" of Pantayong Pananaw (original) (raw)
Related papers
Given that years and generations have passed since the famous Dr. Jose Rizal's death, yet his name, background, and contribution remain controversial. We are made aware that he also has a full name of Jose Protacio Mercado Rizal Y Alonzo Realonda due to execution of the Claveria decree during the Spanish era which enforced the Filipinos to change their surnames for a better and organized tax collection. Just like us, students, he also made a way and maximized his academic opportunities to get ahold of knowledge and information. At the same time, those learnings that he instilled along the way in his journey in his studies with literature and medicine are applied by him producing mesmerizing poems and literary pieces. Not to mention, also, by attending to patients deeply in need of consultation from an ophthalmologist in which he is licensed. Although if we come to think of it, no matter how far it is in the past, it still comes into question if Rizal deserved to be our national hero? Is he really a hero or a traitor? Of course, each individual has different opinions. However, let's try to dive in deeper discussions of the factors that will greatly affect the answer to that very critical question. Based on the given article, it is usual for national heroes to be declared after a national revolution has taken place. Particularly, during that significant event, the "hero" is known to be fighting for an eager demand for freedom of its homeland. Now, if we try to rethink the events, did Rizal ever do it? Did he ever maximize his limitations in pursuit of the Filipinos' freedom? Upon reading the provided learning material, a lot of sensible points have been made. I could truly say that it is an eye opener and it did not sugar coat details, instead, provided factual informationat least, based on the teachings and available articles in today's accessible resources.
Edel Garcellano, the Filipino Critic in a Time of War
Entrada, 2021
Edel Garcellano's coruscating wit, trenchant analyses, and principled critical stance and interventions on literary, cultural, social, and political issues have made him one of the most influential, though underappreciated, critics of our time. This article combines personal reminiscences with an attempt to provide a preliminary overview of Garcellano's key ideas about the inter-disciplinal task of imagination and criticism, the role of "the Filipino critic in a time of war" (to use Garcellano's term) and the necessity of engaging in "contrapuntal readings" that interrogate the politics of reading, writing and the text, while remaining vigilant about the location and locution of the critic herself/himself.
Postcolonial Studies and Pantayong Pananaw in Philippine Historiography: A Critical Engagement
2016
This paper offers a platform for a mutually critical imaginary dialogue between two different anti-Eurocentric analytic approaches, Postcolonialism (PC) and Pantayong Pananaw (From-Us, For-Us Perspective, PP). The dialogue foregrounds key areas of engagement between these approaches and allows in the process to revisit a number of vexing issues that interrogate them as well as the nature of an engaged, pro-marginalized scholarship. It suggests that while each approach can profitability learn from the other, it seems that a truly progressive aspiration may be better served by going beyond the current orientations or foci of the two approaches.
A Critical Paper on Renato Constantino's "The Philippines: A Past Revisited" by Guillienne Perez
A Critical Paper on Renato Constantino's "The Philippines: A Past Revisited" by Guillienne Perez , 2022
The Philippines has always had this image of vibrant, dynamic, and uplifting energy radiating from the culture and traditions our ancestors imparted to us, but behind these were the tragic events they experienced during the colonial period. All these tragic events are rooted in the abuses of the intruders who took away everything from those who were before them, a significant manifestation of their hunger for power and gold as well as their thirst for violence to achieve something that will personally benefit them. However, these exploitations were the factors that ignited the burning desire of the Filipinos to obtain liberation and justice from the colonizers. These events made us realize that our fellow Filipinos experienced various changes and struggles from the exploiters. These struggles became the foundation of the history of our country as they involved the collective consciousness of the masses that desired national liberation through standing against the oppressors.