Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists (original) (raw)
Related papers
Gendered Science: Trends and analysis of contributions of Indian Women Scientists
All the major world organizations have recognized the vital role that a woman plays in educating the entire family & also in maintaining its health in a developing country. Indian women have excelled in almost all fields they are storming Information and Technology field , the number of women in computing and internet industries has registered a sharp rise. While presenting the hardcore figures about the women's enrollment in higher education system in different faculties; relative presence of women as scientific and technical staff in various institutions; recognition by various reputed national agencies; motivation and constraints to opt for science are also focused in this study. As an output Indicator, Publication analysis of Women scientist has also been presented.
Women Academic Scientists in India
Social Studies of Science, 2002
Gender inequality in science is common to most nations. To a large extent, this inequality is a product of the socio-cultural environment in which science is conducted. The professional environment and the socio-cultural context are inextricably linked together in the practice of science. This Note analyses the perceptions of women academic scientists in India regarding the work and social environment, and the nature of problems faced by them. A triangulation of questionnaire and interview methods was employed to develop a holistic picture. The findings show that women academic scientists are influenced by the prevailing sociocultural system. Thus, 'patrifocal' ideology prevails at the workplace and in the family. Women face gender-related difficulties at work, and also shoulder a dual burden resulting in stress. These problems have significant consequences for the career of women academic scientists.
Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?
Journal of Informetrics
Women's access to academic careers has been historically limited by discrimination and cultural constraints. Comprehensive information about gender inequality within disciplines is needed to understand the problem and target remedial action. India is the fifth largest research producer but has a low international index of gender inequality and so is an important case. This study assesses gender inequalities in Indian journal article publishing in 2017 for 186 research fields. It also seeks overall gender differences in interests across academia by comparing the terms used in 27,710 articles with an Indian male or female first author. The data show that there are at least 1.5 male first authors per female first author in each of 26 broad fields and 2.8 male first authors per female first author overall. Compared to the USA, India has a much lower share of female first authors but smaller variations in gender differences between broad fields. Dentistry, Economics and Maths are all more female in India, but Veterinary is much less female than in the USA. There is a tendency for males to research thing-oriented topics and for females to research helping people and some life science topics. More initiatives to promote gender equality in science are needed to address the overall imbalance, but care should be taken to avoid creating the larger between-field gender differences found in the USA.
Review of Women and Science in India - a Reader. Editor: Neelam Kumar
International Journal of Gender Science and Technology, 2009
When imagining 'a scientist' many people think of a 'mad' man with curly hair, surrounded by bubbling test tubes, wearing a white laboratory coat. This image is seldom replaced by the likes of Marie Curie. But to name or think of an Indian woman scientist would be difficult even for most of science graduates. Breaking the jinx of the stereotypical image of an 'Indian woman', and to visualize her as a scientist is still a cherished idea. This, of course, is an issue which is informed by the patriarchal mindset of a society, but science with its 'universality, objectivity and rationality' has also perpetuated an idea of being a 'masculine' discipline. The book under review, edited by Neelam Kumar, challenges these notions.
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
The present scientometric study assesses the publication output of the scientists of Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS) during 2008 to 2017 as reflected in the Web of Science database to figure out the research performance, scholarly communication behaviour and its citation impact. The scientists of IACS contribute total 4,304 research articles including 22.58 percent international collaborated articles. Further, the publications have been evaluated in terms of year, types of collaboration, authorship pattern, source journals, impact factor, collaborating institutions, collaborating countries and citations. It is found that majority of the published articles are produced by three authored and the international collaborated articles which receive wider citation impact. The developed countries like USA, Japan, Germany and England are found as the most favoured countries by the scientists of IACS for research collaboration and the Journal of Physical Chemistry C s...
Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis
Scientometrics, 2015
The main objective of this paper is to study the development and growth of scientific literature on women in science and higher education. A total of 1415 articles and reviews published between 1991 and 2012 were extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. Standard bibliometric indicators and laws (e.g. Price's, Lotka's, and Bradford's laws) were applied to these data. In addition, the Gender Inequality Index (GII) was obtained for each country in order to rank them. The results suggest an upward trend not only in the number of papers but also in the number of authors per paper. However, this increase in the number of authors was not accompanied by greater international collaboration. The interest in gender differences in science extends too many authors (n = 3064), countries (n = 67), and research areas (n = 86). Data showed a high dispersion of the literature and a small set of core journals focused on the topic. Regarding the research areas, the area with the highest frequency of papers was Education and Educational Research. Finally, our results showed that countries with higher levels of inequality (higher GII values) tend to present higher relative values of scientific productivity in the field.
A Scientometric Study of Indian Scientists based on Web of Science Data for 2013-2022
ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, 2023
The aim of the study is to assess the scientific productivity of Indian Scientists over a period of ten years from 2013 to 2022 by examining their publications covered in the Web of Science (WoS) database. A total of 15,746 contributions were identified and their scientometric parameters were collected and analysed. The analysis include the annual number of contributions during the period, total number of citations received and the annual mean citations per contribution. The top ranking 25 scientists were identified and their contributions were further analysed based on the number of contributions in their names, the number of citations received, and the scientometric measures like h-index, g-index and m-index.