Sensemaking of Public Relations in Organisational Crisis Response Decision-Making (original) (raw)
Related papers
Crisis Management in the Public Sector
Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2014
The practice and study of public administration has long included questions of efficiency and effectiveness in crisis management. There are some misunderstandings of the problems faced, like the recent global economic crisis from the public management perspective. These misunderstandings in the public sector may cause different perceptions of the crisis, which lead people and organizations to some misunderstandings and ineffective reactions of crisis management, which bring slower and ineffective results. In light of this rapidly changing environment, "new public management" requires quick, flexible, and adaptive decision making systems and structures. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the usage of "systems thinking" in "new public management" to provide a dynamic approach to crisis management. In that respect, a structural analysis of the global and local crisis and systems thinking modeling is discussed in the scope of crisis in the first section. In the second section, the relationship between new public management and systems thinking within crisis management in the public sector is studied. In the conclusion, the necessity of usage of the new tools and decision support systems by public management in crisis management is emphasized in light of the developments brought by New Public Management.
May, 4 th -7 th Track 4: Responsibility in public management This article investigates a case of crisis management in a French public company. Combining stakeholder management and a knowledge-based perspective, we propose an analytical framework of organizational crisis management processes. We will first show how the crisis can be analyzed as a collapse of existing frames of collective action, and then present the crisis management processes in details. Our analytical framework leads us to distinguish two kinds of actors who played different roles in those processes. On the first side, the crisis cell (more specifically the crisis communication expert) defined the institutional positioning of the company. This positioning provided a new framework of action, on which organizational actors as well as external stakeholders could rely. On the other side, a critical factor of success of the crisis management relied on its capacity to mobilize various organizational 'anchorage points...
Crisis Decision Making and Management
2012
Crisis management studies is a research area that analyzes how public and private actors respond to events that threatens individuals and society. There are many organizational and societal processes that enter this empirical space and several social science disciplines have contributed to the development of this research area, such as sociology, political science, psychology, public administration, and international relations to name some of the most prominent. A core question when studying the management of crises will always be: what characterizes high stake decisions made under pressing circumstances? When starting to answer this question, we need an understanding of both psychological and institutional forces that surround the situation in order to see the individual decision-maker in context.
Crisis Management and the Public Sector: Key Trends and Perspectives
Public-sector Crisis Management [Working Title]
A crisis is a situation approaching a dangerous phase, which requires urgent intervention to avoid harmful effects on the body of an organization in order to return to normal situation. It is a decisive and critical time for the organization, where the wrong decision can even cost its viability. This situation can shape political, legal, economic, and governmental impact on its activities. From different definitions of crisis, we seek to underscore key elements of a crisis that may threat a public organization and, also, to highlight both the elements of management responsiveness resulting in the loss of control in the organization, regarding the short time demand for decision-making. The key purpose of this chapter is to illustrate the basis available in the international literature, upon which public risk mechanisms can be reviewed and chosen in public sector organizations under the scope of their applicability.
Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable
1986
The aim of this study is to identify important factors influencing organizational readiness to deal with the crisis in business organizations. The study designs a questionnaire in Likert scale and distributes it among some experts who work for Mapna company in Iran. The study uses the method developed by Mitroff (2005) [Mitroff, I. I. (2005). Why some companies emerge stronger and better from a crisis: 7 essential lessons for surviving disaster. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.], which investigates the effects of four factors including job satisfaction, increase in income, cost reduction and change in strategies on crisis management. Using Pearson correlation ratio, the study has confirmed a positive and meaningful relationship between crisis management and three factors including increase in income, cost reduction and change in strategies. However, the study did not find any evidence to support the relationship between job satisfaction and crisis management.
Crisis management to ensure effective and continuous performance
An organization’s effectiveness is directly affected by its crisis management process. The relevance for an organization to possess an efficient crisis management process cannot be over-emphasized, since it determines the continuous survival of the organization and prevents an immediate closure of its work process. Its importance lies on the identification of the likely causes of crisis whether from the internal or external environment and also the establishment of an effective crisis management process that would assist organization in the management of crisis. The article aims to share information on the various causes of crisis, techniques in crisis management, and the relationship between crisis management and organizational performance. Key Words: Management, crisis, crisis management, and organizational performance.
High-profile crisis management in Australian and New Zealand organisations
Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 2007
This thesis demonstrates that it is paramount to develop crisispreparedness strategies and practices based on empirical research, in order to improve an organisation's ability to manage effectively and, ultimately to survive, a high-profile crisis event. Although there are many high-profile crises that have been managed successfully by applying strategies to make organisations more resilient, there is still considerable confusion and uncertainty about the way these crises have been evaluated and the way their success can be measured in relation to other crises. There are no international crisis-preparedness standards in relation to a set of crisis outcomes indicators that could be applied. This lack of empirically proven relationships between crisis-preparedness strategies and their effect on crisis outcomes makes the identification of effective strategies very difficult. Case studies, anecdotal evidence and a limited number of empirical crisis management studies (i.e. effect on share price) suggest a great variability in the effectiveness of certain strategies and practices that have produced inconclusive results. This study analyses the strategies variability to advance knowledge in the field of crisis management. The purpose of this study is to address the gaps and contradictions in the literature. The study achieves this purpose by investigating the relationships between crisis preparedness: strategic preparedness, stakeholders' relationships, crisis histories and the outcomes of a crisis event, using qualitative and quantitative methods and innovative ways to operationalise these concepts. A high-profile crisis management model (HPCM) was developed from the literature to show the theoretical relationship between crisis-preparedness dimensions and crisis outcomes. Hypotheses were developed and tested based on the relationships we identified in the model. The relationships were tested using quantitative information from 50 organisations which experienced a highprofile crisis. The tested hypotheses were further explained by utilising four qualitative case studies of Australian and New Zealand organisations. Preface This research was funded by an ARC Linkage grant, with industry partner, Media Manoeuvres. This research had the full support of the Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) and the Public Relations Institute of New Zealand (PRINZ). Marnie Collins from the Statistical Consulting Centre of the University of Melbourne provided advice to carry out the quantitative statistical analysis in the thesis. The Centre for Global Innovation and Entrepreneurship was instrumental to gained access to crisis experts from the European Academy of Crisis Management and other sources of information. I was assisted in the editing of this thesis by Dr. Jo Stubbings from Ink Sling Writing, Editing, and Proof Reading Services; Erina Reddan and Clare Kermond. Acknowledging all the people who provided assistance to me in this academic adventure is, in itself, a very daunting task, as one always runs the risk of forgetting to put a key name in the thesis puzzle. Firstly, I would like to thank my Supervisor Associate Professor Mile Terziovski for his full support and dedication. Professor Terziovski was the academic guide that with enthusiasm, energy and professionalism helped me to walk to the end of this road. Professor Mile worked long hours in this project and he was always available for critical discussion. I'd also like to thank my associate Professor Danny Samson for his useful advice, particularly during the confirmation process. My academic and PhD colleagues were invaluable in testing and teasing at the various arguments in this thesis to strengthen and deepen it. And, of course, for the support through the ups and downs of undertaking such a demanding piece of research. I'd like to acknowledge the administrative staff of the Department of Management, the School of Graduates, the Melbourne Research and Innovation Office, for their unending patience and support. Particularly because they were brave enough to test the boundaries of the ARC linkage limitations to help me retain the financial assistance necessary for me to complete this thesis. My thanks and appreciation goes also to Sam Elam and her Media Manoeuvres team for supporting this research, as well as to Robert Masters, former president of the Public Relations Institute of Australia, who gave me feedback and facilitated access to research respondents in Australia and New Zealand. Thanks to my friends in the Sindicato who kept me more or less sane in our weekly meetings. And thanks, too to my wife's family, especially Kate, who supported this research by looking after my children when deadlines pressed closer. My own family in Mexico has been a profound source of support as well, for which I thank them. Finally to my wife, Erina, and my daughters, Maya and Alena, who have been endlessly patient and the unwavering force behind my motivation to complete this adventure. I dedicate this thesis to Erina for being my music and to Maya and Alena for being the instruments that played it.