Succession 1792-1804 - Addressing the Dresser: Louis-Hercule Timoleon, Duke Of Cossé-Brissac To Bernard Raymond Fabré-Palaprat (original) (raw)
Related papers
Succession 1307-1804 Re-Examining the Larmenius Charter
Templar Succession: Establishing Continuity 1307-Present, 2021
The Larmenius Charter is easily the most controversial artifact of the modern Templar movement. As the only purported line of documented continuation from the historical Order of the Knights Templar, it was supposedly written or commissioned by Jean Marc Larmenius in 1324 as a transfer of his Grandmastership due to age. Interest in its origins and potential authenticity has never been lacking. This paper challenges the accepted narratives of the Charter.
Verifying the Continuation of the French Ordre du Temple and the OSMTJ
Templar Succession: Establishing Continuity 1307-Present, 2021
One of the most signifcant gaps in the chronologies regarding the continuation of the Ordre du Temple and the modern Templar movement lies in dim period that exists from the waning days of the late 1800s until 1932. From there we see the emergence of the Sovereign and Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem under Theodore Covias. In most retellings, the time of the Grandmastership of Josephin Peladan in 1892 until the registration of name of OSMTJ are left with little comment, and yet, this period of time is crucial to establish a legitimate continuance. Even the historicity of the Grandmastership of Peladan is a matter of question. Peladan, famous for his voluminous wrtings, paintings, and his fervent Catholic mysticism, has scholars devoted to his study, and yet even they cannot verify a connection beyond doubt. Nevertheless, in this treatise the subject of the continuation from Peladan to the 1932 registration will be attempted with every source available to the author, and will be dealt with honestly.
Notes on Templar personnel and government at the turn of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries
Journal of Medieval History, 2009
The Hospital of St John is thought to have been in various respects in a rather more healthy condition than the order of the Temple in the late thirteenth century, and comparisons and contrasts between the two orders have recently been made, often to the detriment of the Templars. This view is examined with reference to recruiting, the role of sergeants, ignorance among brothers, provincial administration, central government, and roles after the collapse of the crusader states. The argument is advanced that the Temple was not in a noticeably worse state than the Hospital and that on many issues the similarities between the two orders are more marked than the differences.
Origins of Masonic Templarism in the French Ordre du Temple
Templar Succession: Establishing Continuity 1307-Present
For the past century and a half, Masonic Templarism has been nearly synonymous with the name Knights Templar. If one has a notion of a modern Templar, it is probable that it is a Masonic one. The official stance of the Masonic Templars today is that there is no historical connection between the medieval Order and modern Freemasonry, 1 but was created by "Thomas Dunckerley, [who] wanted to promote a concept of chivalry and Christianity within a masonic framework." 2 Nevertheless, there is a strong undercurrent of rumor, legend, and pseudo-history that has existed for centuries that asserts a real, historical connection to the original Order. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the historical origins of Masonic Templarism based on verifiable datapoints, limited speculation, and from a perspective uncolored by Masonic favor.
This article provides an outline for a new interpretation of the trial of the Templars, with special attention to the texts written by the instigators of the case, namely, Philip the Fair and his ministers. The trial had everything to do with the growth of the French monarchy. With the “discovery” and repression of the “Templars' heresy,” the Capetian monarchy claimed for itself the mystic foundations of the papal theocracy. The Temple case was the last step of a process of appropriating these foundations, which had begun with the Franco-papal rift at the time of Boniface VIII. Being the ultimate defender of the Catholic faith, the Capetian king was now fully invested with a Christlike function that put him above the pope. What was at stake in the Templars' trial was the establishment of a royal theocracy.
The Templars in France: Between History, Heritage, and Memory
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2015
Resumé: Les Templiers en France n'ont jamais fait l'objet d'une étude scientifique de synthèse. Leur ordre, pourtant, a été dès l'origine étroitement lié à l'espace actuel du pays: une majorité de frères en était issue, et l'oïl, très vite, s'est imposé comme la langue officielle de l'institution. Pendant deux siècles, cette dernière a utilisé le royaume capétien comme sa principale base-arrière pour opérer en Orient et alimenter cette vocation si singulière fondant dans une même démarche religieuse prière et combat. À l'issue du procès ouvert en 1307, né de la volonté de Philippe le Bel, le Temple, bien que dissous, n'a pas totalement disparu du paysage français: un bâti a subsisté et, plus encore, un mythe a pris forme, duquel, peu à peu, une historiographie s'est déprise. Celle-ci, qui s'est considérablement renforcée au tournant des XX e et XXI e siècles, permet désormais de considérer la présence templière en France avec un regard neuf, capable d'aller contre bien des idées reçues afin de mieux saisir une réalité médiévale qui, si elle continue à fasciner, demeure parfois étrangement abordée.