O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protects against nitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis (original) (raw)
Related papers
BMC Cancer, 2011
Background: The DNA repair protein O 6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) confers resistance to alkylating agents. Several methods have been applied to its analysis, with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) the most commonly used for promoter methylation study, while immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become the most frequently used for the detection of MGMT protein expression. Agreement on the best and most reliable technique for evaluating MGMT status remains unsettled. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the correlation between IHC and MSP. Methods: A computer-aided search of MEDLINE (1950-October 2009), EBSCO (1966-October 2009) and EMBASE (1974-October 2009) was performed for relevant publications. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were those comparing MGMT protein expression by IHC with MGMT promoter methylation by MSP in the same cohort of patients. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS and STARD instruments. Previously published guidelines were followed for meta-analysis performance. Results: Of 254 studies identified as eligible for full-text review, 52 (20.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The review showed that results of MGMT protein expression by IHC are not in close agreement with those obtained with MSP. Moreover, type of tumour (primary brain tumour vs others) was an independent covariate of accuracy estimates in the meta-regression analysis beyond the cutoff value. Conclusions: Protein expression assessed by IHC alone fails to reflect the promoter methylation status of MGMT. Thus, in attempts at clinical diagnosis the two methods seem to select different groups of patients and should not be used interchangeably.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, 2011
O 6 -Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a suicide enzyme that repairs the pre-mutagenic, precarcinogenic and pre-toxic DNA damage O 6 -methylguanine. It also repairs larger adducts on the O 6 -position of guanine, such as O(6)-[4-oxo-4-(3-pyridyl)butyl]guanine and O 6 -chloroethylguanine. These adducts are formed in response to alkylating environmental pollutants, tobacco-specific carcinogens and methylating (procarbazine, dacarbazine, streptozotocine, and temozolomide) as well as chloroethylating (lomustine, nimustine, carmustine, and fotemustine) anticancer drugs. MGMT is therefore a key node in the defense against commonly found carcinogens, and a marker of resistance of normal and cancer cells exposed to alkylating therapeutics. MGMT also likely protects against therapy-related tumor formation caused by these highly mutagenic drugs. Since the amount of MGMT determines the level of repair of toxic DNA alkylation adducts, the MGMT expression level provides important information as to cancer susceptibility and the success of therapy. In this article, we describe the methods employed for detecting MGMT and review the literature with special focus on MGMT activity in normal and neoplastic tissues. The available data show that the expression of MGMT varies greatly in normal tissues and in some cases this has been related to cancer predisposition. MGMT silencing in tumors is mainly regulated epigenetically and in brain tumors this correlates with a better therapeutic response. Conversely, up-regulation of MGMT during cancer treatment limits the therapeutic response. In malignant melanoma, MGMT is not related to the therapeutic response, which is due to other mechanisms of inherent drug resistance. For most cancers, studies that relate MGMT activity to therapeutic outcome following O 6 -alkylating drugs are still lacking.
PLOS One, 2011
O 6 -methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been identified as a potential prognostic marker for glioblastoma patients. The relationship between the exact site of promoter methylation and its effect on gene silencing, and the patient's subsequent response to therapy, is still being defined. The aim of this study was to comprehensively characterize cytosine-guanine (CpG) dinucleotide methylation across the entire MGMT promoter and to correlate individual CpG site methylation patterns to mRNA expression, protein expression, and progression-free survival. To best identify the specific MGMT promoter region most predictive of gene silencing and response to therapy, we determined the methylation status of all 97 CpG sites in the MGMT promoter in tumor samples from 70 GBM patients using quantitative bisulfite sequencing. We next identified the CpG site specific and regional methylation patterns most predictive of gene silencing and improved progression-free survival. Using this data, we propose a new classification scheme utilizing methylation data from across the entire promoter and show that an analysis based on this approach, which we call 3R classification, is predictive of progression-free survival (HR = 5.23, 95% CI [2.089-13.097], p,0.0001). To adapt this approach to the clinical setting, we used a methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) test based on the 3R classification and show that this test is both feasible in the clinical setting and predictive of progression free survival (HR = 3.076, 95% CI [1.301-7.27], p = 0.007). We discuss the potential advantages of a test based on this promoterwide analysis and compare it to the commonly used methylation-specific PCR test. Further prospective validation of these two methods in a large independent patient cohort will be needed to confirm the added value of promoter wide analysis of MGMT methylation in the clinical setting.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012
Triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by the triple-negative (ER/PgR/Her2 negative) phenotype, are frequently associated with BRCA gene mutation, and are not candidate to currently available endocrine and HER2-targeted treatments. MGMT is involved in direct DNA repair exerted by cleavage of mutagenic alkyl adducts within DNA, and its epigenetic silencing confers susceptibility to DNA-damaging alkylating agents in glioblastomas and melanomas. MGMT methylation status has not been extensively investigated in breast cancer patients. The goal of our study was to evaluate the MGMT methylation status in TNBC patients, for most of which BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational status was known. We evaluated MGMT methylation status by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 92 TNBC patients. By using the GelDoc system (Biorad) software, the cases were further classified as follows: 0 (absence of methylated signal), 1 (prevalence of unmethylated signal, U/M ratio>1), 2 (prevalence of methylated signal, U/M ratio<1), and 3 (absence of unmethylated signal). MSP products were obtained in 89 (96.7%) of the cases. Overall, 15 (16.9%) cases were classified as 0, 33 (37.1%) cases as 1, 39 (43.8%) cases as 2, and 2 (2.2%) cases as 3. The 48 cases classified as 0 and 1 were considered as MGMT unmethylated, and the 41 cases classified as 2 and 3 as MGMT methylated. The prevalence of MGMT methylation in patients with BRCA1 mutated, wild-type, and unknown was 30.2% (13/43), 63.6% (14/22), and 58.3% (14/24), respectively. MGMT methylation was unrelated to the main clinical pathological characteristics, with the exception of a weak association with advanced age. In conclusion, our data suggest that in TNBC with wild-type BRCA1, the direct DNA repair system may be frequently (63.6%) silenced by MGMT methylation. The evaluation of the MGMT status could offer a new adjunct in predicting tumor response to alkylating drugs in TNBC patients.
Infrequent promoter methylation of the MGMT gene in liver metastases from uveal melanoma
International Journal of Cancer, 2008
Uveal melanoma is associated with a high mortality rate once metastases occur, with over >90% of metastatic patients dying within less than 1 year from metastases to the liver. The intraarterial hepatic (iah) administration of the alkylating agent fotemustine holds some promise with response rates of 36% and median survival of 15 months. Here, we investigated whether the DNArepair-protein MGMT may be involved in the variability of response to fotemustine and temozolomide in uveal melanoma. Epigenetic inactivation of MGMT has been demonstrated to be a predictive marker for benefit from alkylating agent therapy in glioblastoma. We found a methylated MGMT promoter in 6% of liver metastases from 34 uveal melanoma patients. The mean MGMT activity measured in liver metastases with negligible liver tissue content was significantly lower than in liver tissue (146 versus 523 fmol/mg protein, p 5 0.002). Expression of the MGMT protein was detectable in 50% of 88 metastases by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray. Expression was heterogeneous, and in accordance with MGMT activity data, usually lower than in the surrounding liver. Differential MGMT activity/ expression between metastasis and liver tissue and more efficient depletion of MGMT with higher doses of alkylating agent therapy using iah delivery may provide the pharmacologic window for the higher response rate. However, these results do not support MGMT methylation status or protein expression as predictive markers for treatment outcome to iah chemotherapy with alkylating agents.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2008
Methylation of the promoter region of the O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is known to be predictive of response to temozolomide treatment in patients with glioblastoma. Contrastingly, little is known about variation in the methylation status of the MGMT promoter after treatment or across different regions of the same tumor. About 22 samples from 10 patients who had undergone multiple resections of a glioblastoma were examined with promoter sequencing. Of these, 20 were also analyzed using Methylation Specific PCR (MSP). The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was altered in the specimens obtained pre and post treatment in 2 of 9 samples as assessed by MSP and 7 out of 10 patients as assessed by promoter sequencing. In four patients, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated at primary surgery, but displayed some methylation (32, 44, 12, and 4%) on posttreatment sampling. Alteration in MSP status from unmethylated to methylated was also observed in 2 of these 4 patients. In another patient, methylation increased from 40% on initial sampling to 68% on the second sample. The remaining two patients initially demonstrated some degree of methylation (72% and 12%); subsequent sampling showed no methylation of the MGMT promoter. To ensure variable methylation status was not due to intra-tumoral variability, three to four specimens were sampled from different regions of large glioblastomas (n = 7). Promoter sequencing revealed minimal variation in methylation in all but two sites examined. Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated minimal change in MGMT expression across the tumors. This suggests that variation in MGMT promoter methylation can occur within the same tumor after treatment, necessitating caution in clinical decision-making based on this analysis.
MGMT promoter methylation in plasma of glioma patients receiving temozolomide
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2014
Promoter methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene plays 2 a role in cellular response to alkylating agents. In the present study aimed to: i) evaluate the 3 concordance between MGMT promoter methylation status in tumor tissue and plasma; ii) 4 monitor MGMT promoter methylation status in plasma taken before and during 5 temozolomide treatment; iii) explore the value of MGMT promoter methylation status in 6 plasma as a prognostic/predictive biomarker in glioma patients. 7 We enrolled 58 patients with histologically confirmed glioma at different grades of 8 malignancy. All patients underwent surgical resection and temozolomide treatment. Paraffin-9 embedded tumor tissue was available for 48 patients. Blood samples were collected from all 10 patients before temozolomide treatment (baseline) and at each MRI examination for a 12-11 month period. MGMT promoter methylation status was assessed in both sample types by real 12 time PCR with a specific probe. 13 The frequency of MGMT promoter methylation was 60.4% in tumor tissue and 41.38% in 14 plasma. MGMT promoter methylation status was concordant in the two sample types 15 (Kappa=0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.93; p-value <0.001). Overall and 16 progression-free survival were longer in patients with methylated MGMT promoter. 17 Mortality was higher in patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter, whether in tumor 18 tissue (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.21; 95% CI 0.99-4.95) or plasma (HR: 2.19; 95% CI 1.02-4.68). 19 Progression-free survival was shorter in patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter, 20 whether in tissue (HR: 2.30; 95% CI 1.19-4.45) or plasma (HR: 1.77; 95% CI 0.95-3.30). 21 The cumulative incidence of unmethylated MGMT promoter in plasma at baseline was 58%, 22 and reached virtually 100% at 12 months. In conclusion MGMT promoter methylation status 23 in tumor tissue and plasma was highly concordant, and both were associated with longer treatment response. However we suggest caution in using plasma as a surrogate of tumor 1 tissue due to possible false-negative results.
The International Journal of Biological Markers, 2015
It is already well known that hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is a predictive biomarker of response to temozolomide treatment and of favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Nevertheless, MGMT methylation status has not currently been introduced into routine clinical practice, as the choice of the ideal technique and tissue sample specimen is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare 2 analytical methods, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), and their use on 2 different tissue type samples, snap-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), obtained from a single-center and uniformly treated cohort of 46 GBM patients. We obtained methylation data from all frozen tissues, while no results were obtained for 5 FFPE samples. The highest concordance for methylation was found on frozen tissues (8...
BMC Cancer, 2010
Background: Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene by promoter methylation is associated with loss of MGMT expression, diminished DNA-repair activity and longer overall survival in patients with glioblastoma who, in addition to radiotherapy, received alkylating chemotherapy with carmustine or temozolomide. We describe and validate a rapid methylation sensitive quantitative PCR assay (MS-qLNAPCR) using Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) modified primers and an imprinted gene as a reference. Methods: An analysis was made of a database of 159 GBM patients followed between April 2004 and October 2008. After bisulfite treatment, methylated and unmethylated CpGs were recognized by LNA primers and molecular beacon probes. The SNURF promoter of an imprinted gene mapped on 15q12, was used as a reference. This approach was used because imprinted genes have a balanced copy number of methylated and unmethylated alleles, and this feature allows an easy and a precise normalization. Results: Concordance between already described nested MS-PCR and MS-qLNAPCR was found in 158 of 159 samples (99.4%). The MS-qLNAPCR assay showed a PCR efficiency of 102% and a sensitivity of 0.01% for LNA modified primers, while unmodified primers revealed lower efficiency (69%) and lower sensitivity (0.1%). MGMT promoter was found to be methylated using MS-qLNAPCR in 70 patients (44.02%), and completely unmethylated in 89 samples (55.97%). Median overall survival was of 24 months, being 20 months and 36 months, in patients with MGMT unmethylated and methylated, respectively. Considering MGMT methylation data provided by MS-qLNAPCR as a binary variable, overall survival was different between patients with GBM samples harboring MGMT promoter unmethylated and other patients with any percentage of MGMT methylation (p = 0.003). This difference was retained using other cut off values for MGMT methylation rate (i.e. 10% and 20% of methylated allele), while the difference was lost when 50% of MGMT methylated allele was used as cut-off.
Annals of Oncology, 2014
The use of molecular markers in the diagnostics of gliomas aids histopathological diagnosis and allows their further classification into clinically significant subgroups. The aim of this study was to characterize the methylation pattern of the O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter, gene copy number aberrations, and isocitrate dehydrogenase I (IDH1) mutation in gliomas. We studied 51 gliomas (15 oligodendrogliomas, 18 oligoastrocytomas, 3 astrocytomas, and 15 glioblastomas) by pyrosequencing, array comparative genome hybridization (CGH), and immunohistochemistry. MGMT hypermethylation was observed in 100% of oligoastrocytomas, 93% of oligodendrogliomas, and 47% of glioblastomas. The most frequently altered chromosomal regions were deletions of 1p31.1/21.1-22.2 and 19q13.3qter in oligodendroglial tumors, and losses of 9p21.3, 10q25.3qter, and 10q26.13-26.2 in glioblastomas. Deletions on 9p and 10q, and gain of 7p were associated with the unmethylated MGMT phenotype, whereas deletion of 19q and oligodendroglial morphology was associated with MGMT hypermethylation. IDH1 mutation showed positive correlation with MGMT hypermethylation and loss of 1p/19q. Our results suggest that MGMT promoter methylation, analyzed by pyrosequencing, is a frequent event in oligodendroglial tumors, and it correlates with IDH1 mutation and 19q loss in gliomas. Pyrosequencing proved a good method for assessing the degree of MGMT methylation in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioma samples. However, further studies are needed to confirm a clinically relevant cutoff point for MGMT methylation in gliomas. V