Oral Mucosal Tolerance Versus Systemic Immune Response to Salmonella typhi Antigen (original) (raw)
Related papers
2000
Based on the concept of the common mucosal immune system, immunization at various inductive sites can induce an immune response at other, remote mucosal surfaces. The immune responses elicited through rectal and oral routes of antigen delivery were compared with respect to (i) measurement of antibody responses in serum and various external secretions of the vaccinees and (ii) characterization of the nature and homing potentials of circulating antibody-secreting cells (ASC). Specific ASC appeared in the circulation in 4 of 5 volunteers after oral and 9 of 11 volunteers after rectal immunization with Salmonella typhi Ty21a. The kinetics, magnitude, and immunoglobulin isotype distribution of the ASC responses were similar in the two groups. In both groups, almost all ASC (99 or 95% after oral or rectal immunization, respectively) expressed ␣47, the gut homing receptor (HR), whereas L-selectin, the peripheral lymph node HR, was expressed only on 22 or 38% of ASC, respectively. Oral immunization elicited a more pronounced immune response in saliva and vaginal secretion, while rectal immunization was more potent in inducing a response in nasal secretion, rectum, and tears. No major differences were found in the abilities of the two immunization routes to induce a response in serum or intestinal secretion. Thus, the rectal antigen delivery should be considered as an alternative to the oral immunization route. The different immune response profiles found in various secretions after oral versus rectal antigen administration provide evidence for a compartmentalization within the common mucosal immune system in humans.
Development and use of mucosal vaccines: Potential and limitations
2021
Mucosal surfaces represent a major gateway to microorganisms which may be harmful to health. The humoral immune response has an important action in the defense of these surfaces, as it is able to prevent the entry of pathogens in the body. Vaccines with local application have been evaluated in order to stimulate an efficient immune response in the mucous membranes, since conventional vaccines, for parenteral application, tend to stimulate a mostly systemic response. Vaccines that use the mucosa as an inoculation route are able to generate an immune response directly in the application mucosa and corresponding mucosa, since the mucosal system is integrated, which represents an important advantage in choosing the inoculation route. This paper aims to illustrate some concepts related to mucosal immunity in general, as well as to gather information about what has been studied in relation to mucosal routes of administration of vaccines, immunomodulators and antigen delivery systems.
The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development
Vaccine, 1992
shown that the mucosal immune system, which is characterized by secretory lgA ( S-IgA ) antibodies as the major humoral defence factor, contains specialized lymphoid tissues where antigens are encountered from the environment, are taken up and induce B-and T-cell responses. This event is followed by an exodus of specific lymphocytes, which home to various effector sites such as the lamina propria regions and glands. These responses are regulated by T cells and cytokines and lead to plasma cell differentiation and subsequent production of S-lgA antibodies in external secretions. This knowledge has led to practical approaches for vaccine construction and delivery into mucosal inductive sites in an effort to elicit host protection at mucosal surfaces where the infection actually OCCURS.
Vaccines and mucosal immunisation
Vaccine, 2001
The earliest attempts to protect humans against infectious diseases and toxins were by administering foreign substances to mucosal membranes, predominantly by the oral route. In the late 1880s, significant attention was given to the concept of 'local' immunisation, and the discipline of mucosal immunology was born in the early 1900s. However, despite the early enthusiasm, progress has been slow, with few mucosal vaccines being efficacious. The complexities of mucosal immune regulation and the lack of appropriate antigen delivery systems which can access mucosal inductive sites, have remained substantial obstacles. Recent studies demonstrating compartmentalisation of the common mucosal immune system create further challenges for the development of organ-specific vaccines. In the 21st century, our knowledge of mucosal immunoregulatory mechanisms, coupled with new technology for antigen delivery and immunomodulation will provide the necessary know-how to see the development and widespread use of mucosal vaccines for both preventative and therapeutic use.
Immunology of gut mucosal vaccines
Immunological Reviews, 2011
Understanding the mechanisms underlying the induction of immunity in the gastrointestinal mucosa following oral immunization and the cross-talk between mucosal and systemic immunity should expedite the development of vaccines to diminish the global burden caused by enteric pathogens. Identifying an immunological correlate of protection in the course of field trials of efficacy, animal models (when available), or human challenge studies is also invaluable. In industrialized country populations, live attenuated vaccines (e.g. polio, typhoid, and rotavirus) mimic natural infection and generate robust protective immune responses. In contrast, a major challenge is to understand and overcome the barriers responsible for the diminished immunogenicity and efficacy of the same enteric vaccines in underprivileged populations in developing countries. Success in developing vaccines against some enteric pathogens has heretofore been elusive (e.g. Shigella). Different types of oral vaccines can selectively or inclusively elicit mucosal secretory immunoglobulin A and serum immunoglobulin G antibodies and a variety of cell-mediated immune responses. Areas of research that require acceleration include interaction between the gut innate immune system and the stimulation of adaptive immunity, development of safe yet effective mucosal adjuvants, better understanding of homing to the mucosa of immunologically relevant cells, and elicitation of mucosal immunologic memory. This review dissects the immune responses elicited in humans by enteric vaccines.
Vaccine, 2002
In order to compare the ability of transcutaneous and oral immunization strategies to induce mucosal and systemic immune responses, we inoculated mice transcutaneously with cholera toxin (CT) or the non-toxic B subunit of cholera toxin (CtxB), or orally with Peru2(pETR1), an attenuated vaccine strain of Vibrio cholerae expressing CtxB. In addition, we also evaluated dual immunization regimens (oral inoculation with transcutaneous boosting, and transcutaneous immunization with oral boosting) in an attempt to optimize induction of both mucosal and systemic immune responses. We found that transcutaneous immunization with purified CtxB or CT induces much more prominent systemic IgG anti-CtxB responses than does oral inoculation with a vaccine vector strain of V. cholerae expressing CtxB. In comparison, anti-CtxB IgA in serum, stool and bile were comparable in mice either transcutaneously or orally immunized. Overall, the most prominent systemic and mucosal anti-CtxB responses occurred in mice that were orally primed with Peru2(pETR1) and transcutaneously boosted with CT. Our results suggest that combination oral and transcutaneous immunization strategies may most prominently induce both mucosal and systemic humoral responses.
Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity
Expert Review of Vaccines, 2012
To develop protective immune responses against mucosal pathogens, the delivery route and adjuvants for vaccination are important. The host, however, strives to maintain mucosal homeostasis by responding to mucosal antigens with tolerance, instead of immune activation. Thus, induction of mucosal immunity through vaccination is a rather difficult task, and potent mucosal adjuvants, vectors or other special delivery systems are often used, especially in the elderly. By taking advantage of the common mucosal immune system, the targeting of mucosal dendritic cells and microfold epithelial cells may facilitate the induction of effective mucosal immunity. Thus, novel routes of immunization and antigen delivery systems also show great potential for the development of effective and safe mucosal vaccines against various pathogens. The purpose of this review is to introduce several recent approaches to induce mucosal immunity to vaccines, with an emphasis on mucosal tissue targeting, new immunization routes and delivery systems. Defining the mechanisms of mucosal vaccines is as important as their efficacy and safety, and in this article, examples of recent approaches, which will likely accelerate progress in mucosal vaccine development, are discussed.
Infection and immunity, 1995
Immunization of mice with an attenuated Salmonella typhimurium strain (Phopc) carrying a plasmid encoding a hybrid form of the hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBc) induced specific antibody responses against the bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and HBc. Different mucosal routes of immunization, i.e., oral, nasal, rectal, and vaginal, were compared for their ability to induce a systemic as well as a mucosal response at sites proximal or distant to the site of immunization. Anti-LPS and anti-HBc immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies were measured in saliva, in feces, and in genital, bronchial, and intestinal secretions. Specific antibodies in serum and secretions were observed after immunization via all routes; however, the response to LPS was independent of that against HBc. In serum, saliva, and genital and bronchial secretions, high amounts of anti-HBc IgA were obtained by the nasal route of immunization. Vaginal immunization resulted in two different responses in mice: high and low....