WCSJ2019: scaling new heights in Switzerland (original) (raw)
Related papers
Science as a beat in journalism: Current status and implications for the future
Journal of Media and Communication (JMC), 2023
This paper's main objective is to review existing literature on science journalism, focusing on the current status of the discipline and the implications of the reviewed literature going forward. The paper is driven by the fact that there has been reported conflict regarding how journalists and scientists view scientific information. Journalists have always lamented the insufficient support and cooperation from the science community. On the other hand, scientists argue that journalists' work is to disseminate scientific information through mass communication media and channels to mass audiences. Because of this acrimony, reporting on science as a beat by the media has been affected, leading to the scanty available literature on science journalism as a discipline. Empirical existing literature was searched through the search strings SCI* and JOUR* in peer-reviewed journals and the literature reviewed to ascertain the current status of science journalism, the research gaps and...
Revitalizing Science Journalism for a Digital Age
When a dozen U.S. newspaper science journalists gathered in New York in 1934 to form a professional association, little did they know how their vocation would change in less than a century. Since that meeting, science journalism has evolved from the “gee whiz” of early reporting to focus on the interplay between science, society, and politics. Yet science journalism must continue to evolve, and must now look beyond the print model and its inherent limitations.
Science and journalism: friend or foe?
Proceedings of the International Astronomical …, 2009
A journalist's view on science and journalism. The presentation is based on personal experience gained over the past few years as editor of the minute of science broadcasted at Radio Europa FM, Bucharest, Romania, and as editor and writer for the Romanian electronic science newspaper Ziarul stiintelor. Is it possible to have science with or without journalism? Who is waiting for whom, science or journalism? Is astronomy more attractive to the public than other disciplines? Can it be used as a growing factor for the public understanding of science?
Literature review about the science-journalism relationship
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022
To ensure the quality and correctness of this deliverable, we arranged an internal review and validation process. The deliverable was drafted by the work package leader (University of Twente). All partners contributed and reviewed the overall draft. Finally, the final version was submitted to the project coordinator for a final review and validation. STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY AND DISCLAIMER This deliverable contains original, unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. It builds upon the experience of the team and related work published on this topic. Acknowledgement of previously published material and others' work has been made through appropriate citation, quotation, or both. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are the authors' sole responsibility and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission and the Research Executive Agency (REA), that are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information here contained.
A wider approach to science journalism
2013
In this Essay, based on proposals by other journalists, recommendations from the creators of the Actor-Network Theory and the observation of scientific practice, I am presenting a wider approach to science journalism, taking science as a collective, historical work, marked by uncertainty and a diversity of actors. Compared to the classical, predominant approach, which focuses on individual scientists and considers science a linear, deprived of internal conflicts and a predictable process, the Wider Approach may help journalists write about science in a less naive way, avoiding the most common mistakes while reporting scientific achievements, to diversify the source of the information and draw a more realistic picture of science.
Science communication and science journalism are important in today’s knowledge-based societies. However, little is known about science journalists, especially those in Switzerland. Therefore, this study investigates the professional situation and self-conception of Swiss science journalists. The results from a survey of 78 Swiss science journalists show that they resemble their international colleagues in regard to sociodemographic characteristics and professional self-conceptions. In comparison to their colleagues from other countries, Swiss science journalists work under privileged circumstances and, accordingly, are comparatively satisfied with their professional situation. Nevertheless, they also perceive changes indicative of an upcoming crisis of journalism.
The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices
Journalism, 2011
Science reporters today work within an evolving science media ecosystem that is pluralistic, participatory and social. It is a mostly online environment that has challenged the historically dominant and exceptional role of science reporters as privileged conveyers of specialist information to general audiences. We map this science media environment, drawing on interviews with journalists and writers from nationally prominent US and UK media organizations, describing the shifting roles and emerging practices of science journalists online. Compared to a decade ago, this occupational group, driven by economic imperatives and technological changes, is performing a wider plurality of roles, including those of curator, convener, public intellectual and civic educator, in addition to more traditional journalistic roles of reporter, conduit, watchdog and agenda-setter. Online science journalists have a more collaborative relationship with their audiences and sources and are generally adopting a more critical and interpretative stance towards the scientific community, industry, and policy-oriented organizations.
Journalism and Science: How to Erode the Idea of Knowledge
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2006
This paper discusses aspects of the relationship between the scientific community and the public at large. Inspired by the European public debate on genetically modified crops and food, ethical challenges to the scientific community are highlighted. This is done by a discussion of changes that are likely to occur to journalistic attitudes -mirroring changing attitudes in the wider society -towards science and scientific researchers. Two journalistic conventions -those of science transmission and of investigative journalism -are presented and discussed in relation to the present drive towards commercialization within the world of science: how are journalists from these different schools of thought likely to respond to the trend of commercialization? Likely journalistic reactions could, while maintaining the authority of the scientific method, be expected to undermine public trust in scientists. In the long term, this may lead to an erosion of the idea of knowledge as something that cannot simply be reduced to the outcome of negotiation between stakeholders. It is argued that science is likely to be depicted as a fallen angel. This may be countered, it is posited, by science turning human, by recognizing its membership of society, and by recognizing that such membership entails more than just commercial relations. To rethink its relationship with the public at large -and, in particular, to rethink the ideal of disinterested science -is an ethical challenge facing the scientific community.