Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis May Be an Effective and Safe Treatment Modality for Intermediate Risk/Submassive Pulmonary Embolism (original) (raw)
Related papers
Case Reports in Medicine, 2014
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be devastating. It is classified into three categories based on clinical scenario, elevated biomarkers, radiographic or echocardiographic features of right ventricular strain, and hemodynamic instability. Submassive PE is diagnosed when a patient has elevated biomarkers, CT-scan, or echocardiogram showing right ventricular strain and no signs of hemodynamic compromise. Thromboemboli in the acute setting increase pulmonary vascular resistance by obstruction and vasoconstriction, resulting in pulmonary hypertension. This, further, deteriorates symptoms and hemodynamic status. Studies have shown that elevated biomarkers and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction have been associated with increased risk of mortality. Therefore, aggressive treatment is necessary to “unload” right ventricle. The treatment of submassive PE with thrombolysis is controversial, though recent data have favored thrombolysis over conventional anticoagulants in acute setting. The mos...
Management of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
American Journal of Therapeutics, 2013
Purpose of review Although early pulmonary revascularization is the treatment of choice for patients with high-risk (massive) pulmonary embolism, it remains controversial in patients with intermediate-risk (submassive) pulmonary embolism until recently. Recent published data on the management of high-risk and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients will be the main focus of this review. Recent findings The PEITHO trial supports the rationale of risk stratification in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism. Patients with right ventricular dilation on echocardiography and positive cardiac troponin test have a high intermediate risk of complication and death. Thrombolysis prevents hemodynamic collapse in these patients but with an increased risk of major bleeding particularly in older patients (>75 years). Reduced dose of thrombolysis and catheter-based reperfusion with or without fibrinolysis have shown promising results. Summary Thrombolysis is the treatment of choice for patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. Surgical embolectomy is recommended in case of absolute contra-indication to thrombolysis. In patients with acute right ventricular dysfunction on cardiac imaging and myocardial injury, thrombolysis should be considered if they are 75 years or less of age and are at low risk of bleeding. Full-dose thrombolysis may be excessively risky in patients over 75 years. In patients with either RV dilation or elevated cardiac biomarker, thrombolysis is not recommended.
Assessment of coexisting deep vein thrombosis for risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism
Thrombosis research, 2018
In patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), studies have shown an association between coexisting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and short-term prognosis. It is not known whether complete compression ultrasound testing (CCUS) improves the risk stratification of their disease beyond the recommended prognostic models. We included patients with normotensive acute symptomatic PE and prognosticated them with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk model for PE. Subsequently, we determined the prognostic significance of coexisting DVT in patients with various ESC risk categories. The primary endpoint was a complicated course after the diagnosis of PE, defined as death from any cause, haemodynamic collapse, or adjudicated recurrent PE. According to the ESC model, 37% of patients were low-risk, 56% were intermediate-low risk, and 6.7% were intermediate-high risk. CCUS demonstrated coexisting DVT in 375 (44%) patients. Among the 313 patients with low-risk PE, coexisting DVT (46%) did no...
The Risk-based Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 2009
Risk evaluation and prognostic stratification based upon clinical and radiological findings and new cardiac biomarkers, such as natriuretic peptides (NP) and troponins, represent key points in modern management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Literature evidence shows that normotensive PE with right heart dysfunction (RHD), defined as submassive PE, has poorer prognosis when compared to normotensive PE without RHD, defined as non-massive PE; thus whether submassive PE should be managed more aggressively and with closer monitoring represents the crucial question about acute PE treatment. Although the answer is yet unclear, the most recent guidelines address to thrombolysis as treatment choice in selected high risk patients with submassive PE. Guidelines also clarify the indications for unfractioned and low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux. Therefore, in the present article, the authors focus on modern risk-based therapeutic guidelines of acute PE.
Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Part II: Risk Stratification, Treatment, and Prevention
Circulation, 2003
P ulmonary embolism (PE) presents with a wide clinical spectrum, from asymptomatic small PE to lifethreatening major PE that causes hypotension and cardiogenic shock . Traditionally, our risk assessment is done by gestalt. However, a more precise risk assessment can be obtained by using a formal clinical scoring system, such as the Geneva Prognostic Index. The Geneva Prognostic Index uses an 8-point scoring system and identifies 6 predictors of adverse outcome: 2 points each for cancer and hypotension and 1 point each for heart failure, prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT), arterial hypoxemia, and ultrasound-proven DVT. As points accumulate, prognosis worsens. Remarkably, hypoxemia accounts for only 1 of 8 points.
Determinants of in-hospital clinical outcome in patients with sub-massive pulmonary embolism
Indian Heart Journal, 2018
Introduction: There is limited data regarding in hospital determinants of clinical deterioration and outcome in sub massive pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to evaluate these determinants by comparing biomarkers, CT pulmonary angiogram echocardiography, electrocardiography variables. Methods: 57 patients of sub massive PE diagnosed on CT pulmonary angiogram were included. All patients received UFH on admission and were divided into two groups based on their clinical course. Group 1 comprised of patients who remained stable, group 2 of patients who showed signs of clinical deterioration. Results: There were 34(59.6%) patients in group 1 and 23(40.4%) patients in group 2. No significant difference in age, gender, BMI. 59.37% had sub massive PE, 5.26% had mortality and 40.4% had clinical deterioration. Intravenous UFH infusion given to 59.6%, systemic thrombolysis 22.8%, catheter directed mechanical breakdown 14%, surgical embolectomy in 3.5% patients. S1Q3T3, new onset RBBB, T wave inversion > 1.63 mm, Basal RV size > 40 mm, RV: LV ratio > 1.2, Global RV longitudinal strain <À10.75% and RVSP > 39 mmHg profiled high risk group. Serum BNP and CT pulmonary angiogram derived scores didn't differ significantly although CT findings helped to exclude low risk patients (specificity 88%, sensitivity 95%). Conclusions: Physicians should be aware that patients who have ECG and Echocardiography changes suggestive of right ventricular strain and dysfunction above the cut off values and have documented thrombus in Proximal branches (RPA/LPA) or in distal portion of main pulmonary artery may require aggressive management with systemic/catheter based thrombolysis besides routine anticoagulation with heparin to prevent clinical deterioration.
Catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism
Thrombosis Research, 2011
Background: Systemic thrombolysis rapidly improves right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) but is associated with major bleeding complications in up to 20%. The efficacy of low-dose, catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) on the reversal of RV dysfunction is unknown. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 24 PE patients (60 ± 16 years) at intermediate (n = 19) or high risk (n = 5) from the East Jefferson General Hospital who were treated with USAT (mean rt-PA dose 33.5 ± 15.5 mg over 19.7 hours) and received multiplanar contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) scans at baseline and after USAT at 38 ± 14 hours. All CT measurements were performed by an independent core laboratory. Results: The right-to-left ventricular dimension ratio (RV/LV ratio) from reconstructed CT four-chamber views at baseline of 1.33 ± 0.24 was significantly reduced to 1.00 ± 0.13 at follow-up by repeated-measures analysis of variance (p b 0.001). The CT-angiographic pulmonary clot burden as assessed by the modified Miller score was significantly reduced from 17.8 ± 5.3 to 8.7 ± 5.1 (p b 0.001). All patients were discharged alive, and there were no systemic bleeding complications but four major access site bleeding complications requiring transfusion and one suspected recurrent massive PE event. Conclusions: In patients with intermediate and high risk PE, low-dose USAT rapidly reverses right ventricular dilatation and pulmonary clot burden.
Optional therapeutic management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients
The Moldovan Medical Journal, 2023
Background: Few studies have evaluated the thrombolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism, making this study more valuable. Material and methods: It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-center study. Eligible patients at the age of 18 or older with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography with onset until 14 day and signs of right ventricular (RV) overload on echocardiography took part in the study. Pulmonary Arterial CT Obstruction Index Rate (PACTOIR) was used to define the localization and the expansion zone of thromboembolism. This study included 18 patients with intermediate risk and acute submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. In thrombolysis (TT) group (n=9) were used 50 mg of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) administered in infusion as 0.4 mg/h for 2 hours. In the standard anticoagulation group, unfractioned heparin (UFH) was administered as a bolus of 70 units/kg or a maximum of 5000 units, followed by continuous infusion at an initial rate of 16 units/kg or a maximum of 1000 units/h. Results: The mean age for TT group was 69 vs 63 for the UFH group. PACTOIR was 100% in 3 patients in the half-dose rt-PA group and in 2 patients in the UFH group. RV/LV diameter ratio decreased from baseline to 48 h post-procedure (1.55 vs. 1.13; mean difference,-0.42; p < 0.0001). Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 55 mm Hg in both groups (p < 0.05), with 53 [43-60] in TT group vs. 41.5 [37-45] mmHg in UFH group, P<0.05. Also, RV/ LV ratio and systolic PAP decreased significantly in both groups. Severe bleeding with a need in red blood cell transfusion was seen in 0.11% (1 patient) in the TT group vs 0 in UFH group. The hospitalization length of stay was significantly shorter in the TT group (3.8±1.8, p < 0.05). The rate of secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the UFH group with a high rate of pulmonary hypertension (0 vs. 19%, p=0.003). Conclusions: Half-dose thrombolytic therapy in patients diagnosed with submassive pulmonary embolism significantly reduced death and hemodynamic decompensation in the first 7 days compared to anticoagulant therapy only. With all that being said, it can be concluded that patients with high-intermediate risk PE could benefit from reduced-dose TT.