The Nicaragua Canal: The New-Port Arms Race (original) (raw)
Related papers
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 2014
It was a dispute over some islands and cays in Caribbean whose importance was that they were determining division of continental shelf. The islands are much closer to the coast of Nicaragua than the cost of Columbia, but this fact did not have decisive importance in attribution of sovereignty over the islands. The border on the sea, inherited from Spanish colonial time, was not easy to be determined. The both sides referred to certain legal acts of colonial authorities which might serve as colonial titles, but these acts were not precise enough. On the other hand, Columbia and Nicaragua settled some territorial issue by the 1928 Treaty and the 1930 Protocol thereto. Nicaragua challenged validity of the Treaty, but without success. The International Court of Justice found that Columbia has performed certain acts of sovereign power over the disputed clays in post-colonial time and resolved the dispute in favor of Columbia applying post-colonial ffectivités.
Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), 2001
Latin America and the International Court of Justice (Routledge), 2017
Delimitation of the extended continental shelf, ICJ, Latin America, Delineation of the extended continental shelf, preliminary information, customary international law, tension Article 76 and 77 UNCLOS
Does Colombia participate in the law of the sea?
Ejil Eafit Journal of International Law, 2010
From many years ago, the sea and the oceans had served the human beings for different uses such as communication and commerce between cities, discovery and knowledge, the increase of the military potency of the cities, the coast defense and territory, fishing, and after some years, the use of other economic resources.
PEACE & SECURITY-PAIX ET SÉCURITÉ INTERNATIONALES (EuroMediterranean Journal of International Law and International Relations), 2019
Costa Rica and Nicaragua, that rarely reach direct agreements, had not delimited the maritime areas in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean, nor the land boundary in the northern part of Isla Portillos. Thus, Costa Rica first initiated an action in the International Court of Justice in 2014 regarding the maritime issue, and later, in 2017, requested the definition of the land boundary of that area in Isla Portillos and that it be noted that Nicaragua had set up a new military camp on its beach.This text – in view of the parties’ proposals - will analyze the recent judgment of the Court in the joined procedures, studying the proceedings followed, the relevant geography and history, the theses of the Parties and the reasoning of the Court. L’ARRÊT DE LA COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE DANS LES AFFAIRES DE DÉLIMITATION MARITIME ET TERRESTRE (COSTA RICA C. NICARAGUA), À LA LUMIÈRE DE LEURS PROPOSITIONS RESPECTIVES (2 FÉVRIER 2018) Le Costa Rica et le Nicaragua, qui difficilement arrivent à des accords directs, n’ont pas délimité les espaces maritimes de la mer des Caraïbes et de l’océan Pacifique, ni la frontière terrestre dans la partie nord d’Isla Portillos. Ainsi, le Costa Rica a d’abord engagé une procédure en matière maritime devant la Cour internationale de justice en 2014, puis en 2017, a demandé la définition de la frontière terrestre de cette zone d’Isla Portillos et qu’il soit établi que le Nicaragua avait établi un nouveau Camp militaire sur sa plage.Ce document - à la lumière des approches des parties - analysera le récent arrêt de la Cour qui a résolu les deux procédures ensemble, étudiera la procédure suivie, la géographie et l’histoire perti-nentes, les thèses des parties et le raisonnement de la Cour. LA RECIENTE DELIMITACIÓN TERRESTRE Y MARÍTIMA DE LA CORTE DE LA HAYA (2 DE FEBRERO DE 2018) EN LOS ASUNTOS DE COSTA RICA CONTRA NICA-RAGUA A LA LUZ DE SUS PLANTEAMIENTOS Costa Rica y Nicaragua, que difícilmente llegan a arreglos directos, no habían delimitado los espacios marítimos en el mar Caribe y en el océano Pacífico, como tampoco el límite de tierra en la parte norte de Isla Portillos. Así, Costa Rica inició primero un procedimiento ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia en 2014 por el asunto marítimo, y más tarde, en 2017, solicitó la definición del límite terrestre de esa área de Isla Portillos y que se constate que Nicaragua había establecido un nuevo campamento militar en su playa. Este escrito –a la luz de los planteamientos de las Partes– analizará la reciente sentencia de la Corte que resolvió unidos los dos procedimientos, estudiando el trámite seguido, la geografía e historia relevantes, las tesis de las Partes y el razonamiento de la Corte.
Reexamining the UNCLOS: a Lack of Compliance and Enforceability
Lex Portus, 2022
The article examines the effeteness of UNCLOS and espouses on why it is not a De Jure legally binding agreement but a De facto non-binding agreement. The uncertainty in the law of the sea would inevitably grow and increasingly State practice, across geographies, may well continue to diverge from the traditional views of the law. Given that states are increasingly under the influence of domestic politics and racial tensions, divergence per se is inevitable, and the dire need of the hour is for the comity of nations to get their act together, vis a vis, re-examining the UNCLOS agreement and to thereafter usher in an agreement that would work. The need to rewrite would require much effort and the cooperation of all the states and indubitably, it would call for egalitarian approaches. The keywords: law of the seas, Constitution of the Seas, maritime jurisprudence, the one ocean concept, the binding nature, interpretations of UNCLOS, International Law, USA, China. ISSN 2524-101X eISSN 26...
AN EVALUATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF COASTAL STATES UNDER UNCLOS 1982
African Journal of Law and Criminology, 2018
Maritime zones are areas of the sea for which international law prescribes spatial limits. While customary international law recognises only the territorial sea and high seas as maritime zones, modern international law recognises other maritime zones which reflect the modern uses of the sea. The various maritime zones recognised under modern international law are clearly delineated under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 which regulates the rights and duties of Coastal States in the zones. This research appraises the rights and duties of Coastal States under UNCLOS 1982. It is argued that the ocean regime established under UNCLOS is regulated to the extent that the sovereign rights and obligations of Coastal States in the different maritime zones and the limits of those rights are clearly defined so as to ensure international peace and order. This research which adopts analytical research methodology posits that the effectiveness of UNCLOS as the constitution of the sea will depend to a large extent on the degree of compliance by States-Parties to the convention. Given that UNCLOS was adopted in 1982, there are new challenges confronting Coastal States including ocean noise, oceans and climate change, piracy and armed robbery at sea which were not contemplated by UNCLOS. It is recommended that the international community must rise to the occasion by setting machinery in motion for the adoption of additional treaties to supplement the inadequacies of UNCLOS so as to tackle these current challenges.
Will Nicaragua’s Interoceanic Canal Result in an Environmental Catastrophe for Central America?
Environmental Science & Technology, 2013
Nicaragua's plan to build an interoceanic canal could be considered a major development project that would bring some economic benefit to this impoverished nation. It could also result, however, in an environmental disaster of unprecedented scope. The proposed canalarguably the most ambitious infrastructure undertaking in Latin American historywould slice the country in half from east to west, traversing Lake Nicaragua (Cocibolca). The granting of such a concession without appropriate a priori environmental studies could pose a significant threat to the largest rain forest and principal fresh water reservoir in Central America. An urgent call is being made herein to the international research and public policy communities to help identify unintended consequences of great significance to environmental health, and to guide policy and approaches to avert a regional environmental disaster.