Evaluating plan implementation: the national statutory planning system in Israel (original) (raw)
Related papers
"Evaluating plan implementation: The national planning system in Israel"
Progress in planning monograph series , 1983
Appendix A. Questionnaire for Chief Planning Official (usually Chief Engineer) 170 AcknoVyledgements i This study iwas supported by a grant from the Ford Foundation received through the Israel Fouhdation Trustees (Ford Grant No.9); we gratefully acknowledge this assistance.!We also wish to thank the planning officials of the local governments sampled for this study, who were the respondents in our interviews, for sharing with us their exper;ience, knowledge, and insights into the planning process and its results. Our thanks are jalso due to Yael Borovsky, who assisted in the acquisition and processing of the empirical data, and to Professor Duncan MacRae Jr. for his helpful reading of our draft. Fin~lly, the assistance of the Department of Urban Planning of the Univer;ity of Wisconsin~Milwaukee, in the production of the manuscript, and in particular the devoted hdlp of its secretarial staff, Paula Hepburn and Roe Campo are recognized with i thanks. i I 101 CHAPTER 1 Progress in Planning The National Statutory Planning System in Israel 105
Social indicators for social planning: The case of Israel
Social Indicators Research, 1974
Social planning (SP) is viewed as an organizing framework for guiding government intervention in social life. Social indicators (SI) can provide the informational basis for formulating policies, preparing social plans and evaluating the impact of government activities. Both SP and SI are only two links in a desired sequence of organized social action. But given the present state of the art, the urgency of social problems and the opportunity cost of waiting for further theoretical development -initial efforts should be directed at developing SI for SP.
Planning Capacities within the Palestinian Municipalities
2009
Municipalities in Palestine are responsible for the planning and organization of cities and public services based on the Local Council Law No. (1) for the year 1997. The capacities within the municipalities vary tremendously throughout their different types, depending on availability of resources in addition to other factors. The study that was conducted on 17 municipalities representing the different types and sizes of municipalities in West Bank and Gaza Strip, in which a questionnaire was developed and focused on the following dimensions: The legal framework: 1) The institutional framework. 2) Awareness (institutional and public) of the importance of planning and community participation. In addition, the study has drafted out the good and bad planning practices within municipalities; these findings will draw the framework of what is needed to enhance and develop the planning process within municipalities. Also, it will enable develop the needed policies and procedures, manual and...
Planning theory in practice: the case of planning Highway 6 in Israel
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1998
Comprehensive rationality and disjointed incrementalism are among the decisionmaking models discussed in planning theory. But the practical relevance of this discussion has been questioned and concrete evidence of links between theory and practice is rare. The case of the planning of Highway 6 in Israel demonstrates this link. Litigation preceding implementation of the project provides documentary evidence, which includes a debate about the respective merits of comprehensive-rational planning and disjointed incrementalism as the way to plan this highway. It is shown that such strategic projects are not and cannot be planned incrementally. Analysis of this case suggests some conclusions concerning the timing and practical consequences of the choice between planning models, and the potential of a contingent framework to link theory to practice.
An International Comparison of City and Regional Policy-Making, 2001
Compared with most other Western countries, Israel has maintained a very high dosage of national-level planning institutions and powers. This is not surprising. Given Israel's unique constraints and national goals, it should be a 'natural' for national-level planning. Yet, as our story will show, these institutions have not always functioned to the same degree or held the same status. The exposition of national-level planning in Israel begins with an introduction to Israel's 'vital statistics' and built-up form. Next comes a section that introduces the key national urban and regional policies in order to give the reader a feel for the context. We then move to the general constitutional and institutional setting for policy-making by national and local government. Then, we focus on the major national-level agencies charged with a comprehensive view and with setting overall policy. This leads to an analysis of the relatively large degree of state involvement in sectoral planning and implementation, and is followed by a detailed presentation of the statutory land-use planning system and of national statutory plans. A separate section recounts how leading planners cleverly utilised the national crisis brought about by mass immigration from the former USSR in the early 1990s, to raise national-level planning to a new plateau through initiatives like the 'Israel 2020' project. To conclude, I sketch my view of the future role for national-level planning in Israel, shaped as it is by the conflicting forces of centralisation on the one hand, and decentralisation and privatisation on the other. Some background geographic and demographic statistics Israel has a population of six million people, 80 per cent of whom are Jewish and 20 per cent Arab. (Here and throughout this chapter, unless stated otherwise, I am referring to Israel in its international borders, without the still occupied parts of the West Bank and the Gaza strip. 1) Israel's population is 92 per cent urban-among the Figure 1 Map of Israel showing neighbouring countries and occupied areas
Lessons for the Study of Policy Implementation: Project Renewal in Israel
Governance, 1995
This article attempts to clarify some of the issues in the debate over the study of policy implementation, in particular the disagreements between proponents of the top-down versus bottom-up approaches. It proposes use of a modified top-down perspective which bridges the assumed dichotomy between policy formulation, enactment, and an implementation process and addresses many of the concerns of the bottom-up research strategy. This new perspective portrays implementation as part of a single ongoing process in which policy is formulated, enacted and continually readjusted and adapted before and after implementation at the local level. The article is based on an analysis of the findings of a case study of the implementation of Israel's Project Renewal, a comprehensive community renewal and development programa hybrid resembling the American Urban Renewal, Model Cities and the War on Poverty programs. Rather than evaluate the success of this Israeli program, the intent here is to ask what the research findings teach about the study of policy implementation.
National-level planning in Israel: Walking the tightrope between centralization and privatization
National-Level Planning in Democratic Countries: An International Comparison of City and Regional Policy-Making,, 2001
Compared with most other Western countries, Israel has maintained a very high dosage of national-level planning institutions and powers. This is not surprising. Given Israel's unique constraints and national goals, it should be a 'natural' for national-level planning. Yet, as our story will show, these institutions have not always functioned to the same degree or held the same status. The exposition of national-level planning in Israel begins with an introduction to Israel's 'vital statistics' and built-up form. Next comes a section that introduces the key national urban and regional policies in order to give the reader a feel for the context. We then move to the general constitutional and institutional setting for policy-making by national and local government. Then, we focus on the major national-level agencies charged with a comprehensive view and with setting overall policy. This leads to an analysis of the relatively large degree of state involvement in sectoral planning and implementation, and is followed by a detailed presentation of the statutory land-use planning system and of national statutory plans. A separate section recounts how leading planners cleverly utilised the national crisis brought about by mass immigration from the former USSR in the early 1990s, to raise national-level planning to a new plateau through initiatives like the 'Israel 2020' project. To conclude, I sketch my view of the future role for national-level planning in Israel, shaped as it is by the conflicting forces of centralisation on the one hand, and decentralisation and privatisation on the other.
After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans
Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1996
In light of the continuing and ever-stronger attacks on the legitimacy of the planning profession, planning scholars have recently been calling for quantitative studies that support the notion that planning matters. What is needed are methodologies that can be used by ...