Association between early surgical intervention vs watchful waiting and outcomes for mitral regurgitation due to flail mitral valve leaflets (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Heart Journal, 2005
Aims To examine the impact of pre-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) on the outcome of mitral valve repair (MVR) for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods and results Among 392 patients with moderate to severe MR who underwent MVR between 1991 and 2002, 283 patients with isolated degenerative MR were followed for 4.7 + 3.3 years. Of 27 deaths, nine were due to cardioembolic events and four were due to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. When compared with patients with pre-operative AF, those with sinus rhythm (SR) had better survival (96 + 2.1 vs. 87 + 3.2% at 5 years, P ¼ 0.002) and higher cardiac event-free rates (96 + 2.0 vs. 75 + 4.4% at 5 years, P , 0.001). In patients with pre-operative SR, observed and expected survival were similar (P ¼ 0.811). Cox multivariable regression analysis confirmed AF [P ¼ 0.027, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 2.9] and age as independently predictive of survival, and AF (P ¼ 0.002, AHR 3.1), New York Heart Association Class, and LV fractional shortening as independently predictive of cardiac event.
Impact of mitral valve treatment choice on mortality according to aetiology
EuroIntervention
Aims: Treatment strategies of high-risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) differ between disease based on functional and disease based on degenerative origin. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of surgical, percutaneous, or conservative treatment of MR according to MV mechanism, for high-risk patients. Methods and results: Survival outcomes of MitraClip, surgical, or conservative strategies were compared for 688 high-risk patients with functional MR and 275 with degenerative MR. Cox regression and propensity analyses were used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. For functional MR, conservative treatment proved to have a higher mortality hazard when compared to MitraClip treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34 to 2.39, p<0.001), while there was no significant difference in mortality hazard between MitraClip and surgery (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.38, p=0.541). For degenerative MR, no clear significant benefit was found when comparing MitraClip to conservative and surgical treatment. Conclusions: High-risk patients with symptomatic functional MR have reduced mortality when undergoing MitraClip intervention, compared to those receiving conservative treatment.
Benefits of Early Surgery on Clinical Outcomes after Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair
The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2018
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical trends of mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation and the benefit of early surgical intervention on repair durability in a high-volume center. . From January 2003 to December 2015, 1903 consecutive patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation underwent mitral valve repair at our institution. The timing of surgical intervention was evaluated by guideline-related indications including symptoms, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for recurrent mitral regurgitation were analyzed. Over 13 years from 2003 to 2015, trends of preoperative characteristics demonstrated that the proportion of asymptomatic patients substantially increased. The 8-year overall survival, freedom from reoperation for mitral valve and freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation were 96%, 96% and 85%, respectively. Ejection fraction<60%, left ventricular end-diastolic ...
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2011
The treatment of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and concomitant mitral regurgitation can be challenging and is associated with reduced long-term survival. It is unclear how mitral valve repair versus replacement affects subsequent outcome. Therefore, we conducted this study to understand the predictors of mortality and to delineate the role of mitral valve repair versus replacement in this high-risk population. From 1993 to 2007, 431 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%) and significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;2) were identified. Patients (44) with concomitant mitral stenosis were excluded from the analysis. A homogeneous group of 387 patients underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery, mitral valve repair in 302 (78%) and mitral valve replacement in 85 (22%). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed on the entire cohort, and the predictors of mortality were identified in 2 distinct risk phases. Furthermore, we specifically examined the impact of mitral valve repair versus replacement by comparing 2 propensity-matched subgroups. Follow-up was 100% complete (median, 3.6 years; range, 0-15 years). Overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 82.7%, 55.2%, and 24.3%, respectively, for the entire group. The risk factors for an increased mortality within the first year of surgery included previous coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio = 3.39; P &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; .001), emergency/urgent status (hazard ratio = 2.08; P = .007), age (hazard ratio = 1.5; P = .03), and low left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio = 1.31; P = .026). Thereafter, only age (hazard ratio = 1.58; P &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; .001), diabetes (hazard ratio = 2.5; P = .001), and preoperative renal insufficiency (hazard ratio = 1.72; P = .025) were predictive. The status of mitral valve repair versus replacement did not influence survival, and this was confirmed by comparable survival in propensity-matched analyses. Survival after combined coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%) and mitral regurgitation is compromised and mostly influenced by factors related to the patient&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;s condition at the time of surgery. The specifics of mitral valve repair versus replacement did not seem to affect survival.
Left Atrial Size Is a Potent Predictor of Mortality in Mitral Regurgitation Due to Flail Leaflets
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2011
Background— Left atrium (LA) enlargement is common in organic mitral regurgitation (MR) and is an emerging prognostic indicator. However, outcome implications of LA enlargement have not been analyzed in the context of routine clinical practice and in a multicenter study. Methods and Results— The Mitral Regurgitation International DAtabase (MIDA) registry enrolls patients with organic MR due to flail leaflets, diagnosed in routine clinical practice, in 5 US and European centers. We investigated the relation between LA diameter and mortality under medical treatment and after mitral surgery in 788 patients in sinus rhythm (64±12 years; median LA, 48 [43 to 52] mm). LA diameter was independently associated with survival after diagnosis (hazard ratio, 1.08 [1.04 to 1.12] per 1 mm increment). Compared with patients with LA <55 mm, those with LA ≥55 mm had lower 8-year overall survival ( P <0.001). LA ≥55 mm independently predicted overall mortality (hazard ratio, 3.67 [1.95 to 6.88]...
Kardiologia Polska, 2014
BACKGROUND Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most frequent indication for valve surgery. There are few studies addressing mitral valve (MV) surgery in the context of etiology of MR. AIMS We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes in the context of the etiological mechanism of MR in patients after MV surgery. METHODS The study group included 337 consecutive patients with severe MR. Preoperative comorbidities, postoperative clinical course, and predictors of in-hospital mortality were assessed. RESULTS Primary etiology of MR was observed in 72% of patients, and of secondary, in 28% (P <0.001). Among the primary MR group, the most common etiological factor was fibroelastic deficiency (79%), followed by Barlow disease (16%) and rheumatic disease (5%) (P <0.001). Secondary MR was seen in ischemic heart disease (67%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (33%) (P <0.001). The incidence of death and complications following surgery did not differ between the groups. Univariate analysis revealed that higher risk of death was associated with older age, severe heart failure symptoms, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, previous percutaneous coronary interventions, cardiopulmonary bypass time, low cardiac output syndrome, and wound infections (P = 0.004, P <0.001, P = 0.005, P = 0.009, P = 0.002, P = 0.006, and P = 0.03, respectively). Also MV replacement with concomitant other valve surgery increased the risk of mortality (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality in patients with severe MR correlate with the type of procedure and concomitant perioperative comorbidities rather than the etiological mechanism of MR itself.
Predictors of hospital mortality after surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation
BACKGROUND: The benefit of mitral valve repair over replacement in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation is still controversial. We report our early postoperative outcomes of repair versus replacement. METHODS: Data were collected for patients undergoing first-time mitral valve surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation between 1990 and 2009 (n = 393). Patients who underwent combined procedures for papillary muscle rupture, post-infarction ventricular septal defect, endocarditis, or any previous cardiac surgery were excluded. Preoperative demographics, operative variables, and hospital outcomes were analyzed, and multivariable regression analysis was employed to identify independent predictors of hospital mortality. RESULTS: Valve repair was performed in 42% (n=164) of patients and replacement in 58% (n=229). Patients who underwent replacement were older and had a higher prevalence of unstable angina, New York Heart Association class IV symptoms, preoperative cardiogenic shock, preoperative myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, and urgent or emergency surgery (all p < 0.05). Unadjusted hospital mortality was higher in patients undergoing valve replacement (13% versus 5%, p = 0.01). Valve repair was associated with a lower prevalence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Multivariable analysis revealed that age, urgency of operation, and preoperative left ventricular function were independent predictors of hospital mortality. Importantly, mitral valve repair versus replacement was not an independent predictor of hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Our data did not suggest an early survival benefit to mitral valve repair over replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. However, age, left ventricular dysfunction, and the need for urgent surgery were independently associated with hospital mortality.
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014
Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is the one of the most frequent valvular heart conditions in the Western world and is increasingly recognized as an important preventable cause of chronic heart failure. This condition also represents the most common indication for mitral surgery and is of particular interest because the mitral valve can be repaired in most patients with very low surgical risk. Historical single-center studies have supported the performance of "early mitral valve repair" in asymptomatic patients with severe degenerative MR to normalize survival and improve late outcomes. Emerging recent evidence further indicates for the first time that the prompt surgical correction of severe MR due to flail mitral leaflets within 3 months following diagnosis in asymptomatic patients without classical Class I indications (symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction) conveys a 40% decrease in the risk of late death and a 60% diminution in heart failure incidence. A 10-point rationale based on the weight of rapidly accumulating clinical data, supports the performance of early mitral valve repair even in the absence of symptoms, left ventricular dysfunction, or guideline-based triggers; when effective operations can be provided using conventional or minimally invasive techniques at very low surgical risk. Semin Thoracic Surg 26:95-101 I
Patient survival characteristics after routine mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005
Background: Ischemic mitral regurgitation has been associated with diminished survival compared with nonischemic mitral regurgitation. Conversion from mitral valve replacement to valve repair has improved prognosis, but it is unclear whether ischemic mitral regurgitation remains an independent predictor of outcome after mitral valve repair. Methods: Five hundred thirty-five patients undergoing mitral valve repair (primarily rigid ring annuloplasty) with or without coronary bypass from 1993 through 2002 were reviewed retrospectively (ischemic mitral regurgitation, n ϭ 141; nonischemic mitral regurgitation, n ϭ 394). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated survival as a function of 9 simultaneous covariates: ischemic versus nonischemic mitral regurgitation, age, sex, number of medical comorbidities, ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, coronary disease, reoperation, and year of operation. Results: According to univariable analysis, patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation had greater age, higher comorbidity, lower ejection fraction, higher New York Heart Association, and higher reoperation rate (all P Ͻ .001) compared with those having nonischemic mitral regurgitation. Univariable 30-day mortality was as follows: 4.3% for patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation versus 1.3% for patients with nonischemic mitral regurgitation (P ϭ .01). Unadjusted 5-year mortality was as follows: 44% Ϯ 5% for patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation versus 16% Ϯ 3% for patients with nonischemic mitral regurgitation (P Ͻ .001). In the multivariable model, however, only the number of preoperative comorbidities and advanced age were independent predictors of survival (P Ͻ .0001), whereas ischemic mitral regurgitation, sex, ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, coronary disease, reoperation, and year of operation did not achieve significance (all P Ͼ .19). After being adjusted for differences in all preoperative risk factors, survival was not statistically different between ischemic mitral regurgitation and nonischemic mitral regurgitation (P ϭ .33). Conclusions: With routine application of rigid ring annuloplasty, long-term patient survival is more influenced by baseline patient characteristics and comorbidity than by ischemic cause of mitral regurgitation per se. Future risk assessment and decision making should be based on patient condition and should not be biased by ischemic cause of mitral regurgitation.