The Dynamics of Technical Progress in Some Developing and Developed Countries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Endogenous technological progress in a multi-sector growth model
Economic Modelling, 2010
This paper presents an endogenous growth model driven by human capital, where human capital can be allocated across three sectors: the production of the final consumption good, the educational sector and the production of technological capital (in the form of knowledge or ideas). In our model, which also includes public expenditure and population growth, labor augmenting technical progress is endogenous and this enriches the transitional dynamics of the economy. With respect to ideas-based growth models, we assume knowledge is produced according to a neoclassical technology, combining ideas and human capital. Such an assumption is motivated by empirical works showing the existence of significant decreasing returns in the creation of ideas at the aggregate level (as and of weak relationship between some inputs of the knowledge production process (as the number of researchers) and the total factor productivity growth rate (as Jones, 2002). Under some general conditions, this economy exhibits the existence of a steady state equilibrium and an unstable multidimensional manifold. Numerical examples are provided to show the existence of stable arms. We are grateful to the anonymous referees for useful comments. This paper has benefitted from conversation on this subject with several colleagues. In particular, we thank Prof. H.Kunze for useful comments and suggestions.
Economic growth and technological change
International Journal of Systems Science, 1990
The purpose olthis study is to develop an economic growth model with endogenous technological change. The model is especially appropriate lor the present Chinese economy in which the role 01 knowledge in economic growth is becoming more important. We are mainly concerned ...
Technological Change and Economic Growth
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015
In a globalizing world economy, the reason for differences in economic growth and inter-country income inequality is explained on the grounds of technological differences. The goal of science and technology is to enable enterprises and individuals to use technologies more efficiently, as this results in reduced costs and enhanced productivity gains. The use of new technologies paves the way for production of new cheaper goods and for capital accumulation and, for that matter, for an enhanced international competitiveness of individual countries, as well as to an enhanced quality for scientific research institutions, while, on the other hand, contributing to cultural and political development of societies. The quality of growth rates is as much important as their size. One may ask the following questions in order to get a better understanding of whether growth has its reflections on people's life or not: Are people involved and included in growth process? Does everybody enjoy the opportunities driven by growth? Do new technologies or trade volumes increase the choices facing people? Is welfare level of the future generations planned? Or, else, who is cared about is today's generations only? Are markets accessible and open to everybody?
Technology Life-Cycles and Endogenous Growth
SSRN Electronic Journal
I develop a growth model in which R&D resources can be directed either to the discovery of new technologies (inventions) or to the improvement of the quality of machines without altering their underlying technology (innovations). Learning-by-doing is an important determinant of the relative share of resources allocated to inventive versus innovative activity. The dynamics generate endogenous economic growth driven by cycles of technological change where the pattern and timing of technological improvements are consistent with historical evidence. That is, (a) inventions and innovations play complementary roles in expanding the technology frontier; (b) when inventions occur they tend to arrive in clusters; and (c) a life cycle of technologies during the early stages of which a discovery is followed by a period of rapid economic growth and innovation, and the late stages of which dwindling innovations and slower growth set the stage for new discoveries.
A Non-linear Development Dynamics of Capital Accumulation, Distribution and Technological Innovation
It is elaborated a development dynamic model of accumulation, growth and distribution in which endogenous technological innovation plays a significant role. Firms' rate of labour-saving technological innovation is made to depend non-linearly on the distributive (wage and profit) shares, with the latter determining both the incentives to innovate and the availability of funding to carry it out. As it turns out, the direction and the intensity of the effect of a change in distribution on the rates of accumulation and growth depend on the prevailing distribution, with a similar dependence applying -alongside the relative bargaining power of capitalists and workers -to the dynamic stability properties of the system. Hence, the model does not rely on full capacity utilisation being reached for a change in the accumulation and growth regime to take place.
Phases of Economic Development in an Endogenous Growth Model with Innovation and Education
Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 2021
This paper analyzes the transitional dynamics of an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital and R&D in which both human capital and innovation drives long run growth. The model suggests that the developing economy follows different stages of development. The first phase is characterized by physical capital accumulation. At the second stage, human capital accumulation represents the main engine of long run growth. The third phase is identified by an increasing variety of intermediate good originating from innovation. However, innovation is not assured for poor economies. In this case, permanent support for innovation can lead a sustainable exit from poverty trap.
ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
This article deals with the relationship between innovation and economic growth in the context of developed world. Innovation is often seen as carried out by highly educated labour in R&D intensive companies with strong ties to leading centers of excellence in the scientific world. Another way to look at innovation that goes significantly beyond this high-tech picture. In this, broader, perspective, innovation – the attempt to try out new or improved products, processes or ways to do things – is an aspect of most if not all economic activities. In this sense, it is argued innovation may be as relevant in the developing part of the world as elsewhere.
Endogenous Growth with Technological Change: A Model Based on R&D Expenditure
2000
The aim of this paper is to empirically analyze the role that aggregate R&D-expenditures play in economic growth. We introduce a technology of innovation based on R&D-expenditures instead of labor to see how this consideration generates sustainable growth determined endogenously, even if population growth does not exist. Therefore, it also seems relevant to analyze the effects of some fiscal policies. For the empirical analysis we make use of an econometric model obtained from the decentralized equilibrium. More precisely, the specification is obtained using the free-entry condition that the competitive equilibrium states for the R&D-activity and the policy function defining the dynamic evolution of patentees' price.
Economic Themes, 2016
The aim of the research in this paper is to analyse the issue of the treatment of the category of technological changes within the main aspects of economic growth theory. The analysis of the key positions of neoclassical theory (Solow), endogenous approach (Romer), and evolutionary growth theory (Freeman) advocates has pointed to the conclusion that these approaches agree on the fact that the category of technological changes is a key generator of economic growth. Neoclassicists were the first to explicitly analyse the category of technological changes in growth theory. They exerted a strong influence on a large number of governments to allocate significant funds for scientific and research development, to stimulate the creation and diffusion of innovation. Supporters of endogenous theory also see the category of technological changes as a key driver of economic growth. Unlike neoclassicists, they emphasise the importance of externalities, in the form of technological spillover and ...
R&D Models of Economic Growth and the Long-Term Evolution of Productivity and Innovation
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Beginning with Romer (1990), a first generation of endogenous R&D growth models with expanding variety or growing quality of intermediate inputs had a scale effect of R&D employment on productivity growth. C. Jones (1995) criticises this class of models on the ground that their prediction is widely at variance with the facts of R&D employment and productivity growth in the advanced countries over the last fifty years. He suggests a model which shares important features with Arrow's (1962) seminal paper on learning by doing. Growth is not endogenous, but, if population is growing, per capita output may persistently increase as a result of purposeful research effort, due to increasing returns to scale in the output sector. More recently, a second generation of endogenous R&D growth models has appeared, in which the scale effect is eliminated and the simultaneous expansion of intermediate goods variety and quality occurs under conditions that make steady-state productivity growth depend on the ratio between intensive R&D employment and total employment (Young (1998), Peretto (1998), Howitt (1999)). A unifying formal classification of the different types of R&D growth models is used in this paper to discuss how they face with the fact that not only R&D employment, but also the R&D employment share has risen dramatically in the advanced countries over the last fifty years. Depending on the model at hand, reconciling this fact with the facts of productivity growth requires different changes in the parameters that describe the 'production function of knowledge'. We try to characterise such changes and discuss their plausibility in the light of the literature on patents and productivity.