The Muddles over Outsourcing (original) (raw)
2004, Journal of Economic Perspectives
Critics have muddled the public debate over offshore outsourcing by using the term interchangeably to refer to altogether different phenomena such as on-line purchase of services, direct foreign investment and, sometimes, all imports. We argue that clarity requires distinguishing among these various phenomena and define outsourcing explicitly as the services trade at arm's length that does not require geographical proximity of the buyer and the seller-the so-called Mode 1 services in the WTO terminologyconducted principally via the electronic mediums such as the telephone, fax and Internet. The definition is appropriate because this is the phenomenon that is relatively new and scary in public consciousness and has fueled the recent "outsourcing" debate. Under this definition, the total number of the U.S. jobs outsourced annually is minuscule and is expected to remain so over the next decade, even on a gross basis (i.e., without adjusting for the jobs in-sourced from the U.S.). The fears that offshore outsourcing will lead to high-value jobs being replaced by low-value jobs down the road are also argued here to be implausible in view of several qualitative arguments to the contrary. We also demonstrate that offshore outsourcing of Mode 1 services raises no new analytical issues, contrary to what many fear. Thus, it leads to gains from trade (with the standard caveats applicable to conventional trade in goods) and, in specific cases, to income-distribution effects.
Related papers
Much Ado About Nothing: American Jobs and the Rise of Service Outsourcing to China and India
Nber Working Papers, 2008
We examine the impact on U.S. labor markets of offshore outsourcing in services to China and India. We also consider the reverse flow or 'inshoring' which is the sale of services produced in the United States to unaffiliated buyers in China and India. Using March-to-March matched CPS data for 1996-2006 we examine the impacts on (1) occupation and industry switching, (2) weeks spent unemployed as a share of weeks in the labor force, and (3) earnings. We precisely estimate small positive effects of inshoring and smaller negative effects of offshore outsourcing. The net effect is positive.
International outsourcing as a challenge for the world trade system
International Economic Policy, 2007
From the strategic management point of view, the twenty-first century is being widely recognized as the century for outsourcing in the global economy. In the meantime international outsourcing is one of the most dynamic, innovation-driven and complicated processes in modern world. The present paper concentrates on the essence of international outsourcing (tracing its roots in the international division of labour and world economic relations theoretical approaches), reviews its explicit and implicit challenges and finally presents opportunities for regulating international outsourcing. Attention is focused on the following key questions: to what extent does international outsourcing represent a challenge for the world trade system? what contribution does international outsourcing make to economic «strength» in the modern world?
WP 2006-4 Dynamic Gains from US Services Offshoring: A Critical View
2007
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large. ... Paper provided by Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School in its series SCEPA Working Papers with number 2006-4. ... No references listed on IDEAS You can help add them by filling out this form. ... This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on ...
2005
JEL No. F2 Trade theory consists of a portfolio of models. What elements might be useful in modeling the offshoring of white-collar services, or do these issues call for an entirely fresh approach? I try to identifying some of the important aspects of this phenomenon and then argue that modeling could focus on (a) vertical fragmentation of production, (b) expansion of trade at the extensive margin, (c) fragments that differ in factor intensities and countries that differ in endowments, and (d) knowledge or capital stocks of countries or firms that are complementary to skilled labor, and create missing inputs for countries otherwise well suited to skill-intensive fragments. I argue that we can make good progress by selecting a number of "modules " from existing theory. I use these to formulate a series of simple "template " models which capture many of the characteristics of offshoring, and then use those models to identify the effects of technological or institut...
Dispelling Some Myths About Offshoring
Academy of Management Perspectives, 2006
Critics of globalization claim that firms are being driven to shift employment abroad by the prospects of cheaper labor. Yet the evidence for this, beyond anecdotes, is slim. In this article, we review evidence on whether firms that do business in foreign countries are substituting foreign for domestic labor. We review the results of previous studies and present new firm-level evidence showing that, in fact, increases in employment in low-income countries do hurt employment at home. The premise that foreign expansion of U.S. multinationals encourages employment at home is a myth, but the domestic employment costs of offshoring are probably fairly small in magnitude.
THE MYTH AND THE REALITY OF OUTSOURCING AND OFFSHORING
2020
Outsourcing and offshoring processes have existed for a long time and have always been closely related to international business. The advent of modern means of telecommunications and transportation, among other vital factors, has enabled the companies to reach levels of outsourcing and offshoring, which we have never witnessed before. On the other hand, this massive offshoring caused a phenomenon called de-industrialisation in the once heavily industrialised countries such as the USA, Australia, UK, Canada, and subsequently to some of the EU countries and Japan. Can the USA and these others, once amongst the most industrialised countries in the world, return the decades-old trend of offshoring misfortune in their interest so that they may experience a "Manufacturing Renaissance" is the primary notion behind this publication.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.