Factors influencing the reduction of plastic bag consumption in Cambodian supermarkets (original) (raw)

Abstract

In 2017, the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) introduced Sub-Decree 168 on the Management of Plastic Bags. It legislated that a 0.10 USD fee would be paid by consumers for each plastic bag they were provided at a supermarket. However, the reduction in plastic bag consumption by supermarkets has been quite limited. This paper analyses the factors that influence the reduction of plastic bag use by supermarket customers in Phnom Penh. It considers socioeconomic characteristics, access to information, existing knowledge, attitudes, and practices, as well as the willingness to pay a fee to use a plastic bag. A survey of 403 customers in five supermarkets was conducted to assess these factors. The study reveals that lack of available information, and poor knowledge, attitudes, and practices presented challenges for the goal of reducing plastic consumption in supermarkets. The inconvenience of a reduction in plastic bag use was found to result in negative attitudes towards the fee. Plastic bag consumption remained high at 1 to 7 bags per visit to a supermarket. Willingness-to-pay the scheduled fee was shown to have minimal influence on the number of plastic bags they used. Thus, this study recommends an increase in the fee to 0.125 USD per bag. A binary logistic regression was used to show that greater access to information, as well as changes in knowledge, attitudes, information, would have a significant influence on the reduction of plastic bag use in supermarkets.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (10)

  1. Adane, L., & Muleta, D. (2011). Survey on the usage of plastic bags, their disposal and adverse impacts on the environment: A case study in Jimma City, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 3(8), 234-248.
  2. Afroz, R., Rahman, A., Masud, M. M., & Akhtar, R. (2017). The knowledge, awareness, attitude and motivational analysis of plastic waste and Research, 24(3), 2304-2315. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-016-7942-0.
  3. Berkowitz, L., & Lutterman, K. G. (1968). The traditional socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(2), 169-185.
  4. Boadi, K. O., & Kuitunen, M. (2003). Municipal solid waste management in the Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Environmentalist, 23(3), 211-218.
  5. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
  6. Chow, C. F., So, W. M. W., Cheung, T. Y., & Yeung, S. K. D. (2017). Plastic waste problem and education for plastic waste management. In Emerging practices in scholarship of learning and teaching in a digital era (pp. 125-140). Springer, Singapore.
  7. Coddington, W. (1990). It's no fad: Environmentalism is now a fact of corporate life. Marketing News, 15(7), 7.
  8. Convery, F., McDonnell, S., & Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), 1-11.
  9. Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  10. Dilkes-Hoffman, L. S., Pratt, S., Laycock, B., Ashworth, P., & Lant, P. A. (2019). Public attitudes towards plastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 147, 227-235. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec. 2019. 05.005.