A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE FOR RAJYA SABHA ELECTION 2020 IN KARNATAKA: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 'VIJAYA VANI' AND 'THE TIMES OF INDIA' (original) (raw)
Related papers
India 2014: Press trend as a predictor of election outcome
2015
As India entered the election season in 2014, the researchers set out to measure political orientations of Indian newspapers. A content analytic study was conducted on the top four English broadsheet dailies and political news that they published on the top contesting national parties were investigated to find out which paper endorsed which party and to what extent. News items published in The Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and The Telegraph were studied. Comparative analyses found the reportage to be highly in favour of the BJP. Besides, the study checked for shift in the endorsement trend over time. Time-series analysis using linear and quadratic regression models was used to show how political orientation shifted from January 21 to May 12, the study period. Both behaviourist and humanist traditions were employed to identify the prevailing political climate and estimate the effect of latent newspaper content.
Abstract On May 11, 2013 elections held in Pakistan where media specially, print media played a vital role in setting different agendas for changing the behaviours of voters. During election campaigns, political parties try to get more coverage in their news and advertisements for influencing on the behaviour of voters. This study examines the relationship of advertisements and news coverage of main stream political parties during the 10th general election campaign in Pakistan from March 15, 2013 to May 10, 2013. The study attempts to provide a comparative analysis of two national language newspapers Daily Jang and Daily Express that how both dailies cover the news and advertisements of different main stream political parties with number of news and advertisements frequency, space, placement and slant on front and back pages of both national newspapers. The main aim of this study is to examine that which political party got more space, placement, frequency and slant in both newspapers and is there any relationship of news stories and advertisements which were published during election campaign? The study involves the theoretical framework of agenda setting, Framing and Propaganda model by using content analysis research technique. The findings of the study revealed that both newspapers had same policy for different political parties. Both newspapers gave more space, frequency, placement and more favorable slant to a particular political party. However, both dailies published more advertisements to a particular political party for their economical interests and published more news stories with frequency, space, placement and slant of a particular party which was in power in this scenario. The research concluded that both newspapers had their same policy for publishing news stories and advertisements. Key words: Comparison, Content Analysis, Agenda Setting, Framing, Election Coverage, Propaganda, Newspapers
Mass media is an active participant of democratic society. Recent popular and theoretical literature emphasizes the every political news have any kind of Bias and agenda. The potential of media to color, distort and perhaps even degrade on entire worldview. Hence, treatment of Indian political news provides us the fact of great importance. This content analysis is based on mainly news portals, although it includes podcasting, webcasting and feedback from readers too. The result of this study is helpful to understand the treatment of Indian political news globally and measurement of bias.
IAEME PUBLICATION, 2020
Purpose of the study: Elections are symbolic affirmations of a country‟s functioning democracy. Yet, in a very real sense, they also reflect assertions of asymmetrical power that contribute to legitimising the decision-making authority of those who stand for office and win. The media, which once functioned as merely channels of communication within the election process, have now emerged as independent power centres operating „autonomously, according to its own economic and symbolic logics‟. The capacity of the media to set political agendas, which has been defined as the „assignment of special relevance to one particular issue or set of information by the source of the message‟ with the expectation that the audience will respond with heightened attention to the content and format of the message has also been noted. Methodology: The narrative literature review method proposed by Green, Johnson, and Adams (2006) was employed as the method for this article. Relevant peer-reviewed papers published during the period 2011-20 were considered for the narrative review. Appropriate papers were selected by a Google Scholar search using the keywords „Mediatization‟, „Political Communication‟, „Credibility of Press‟ and ‟India‟. and „political communication. Main Findings: The broad aim of the present paper was to explore the current academic literature in the field of Mediatization of Politics and Crisis of Press credibility in India. The narrative literature review undertaken indicates scant work with limited focus on the broader issues. Traditional media especially electronic media mainly TV has its own influence on voting behaviour and political engagement was the well-explored domain, but the determinants and uniqueness of such communication have not been explored. Applications of this study: The indications from the review showcase that the magnitude and essence of political communication have changed through the years. The spectrum of political communication through social media has a great role in political and civic engagement. This study will be useful to the researchers in the field of mass communication, journalism, and political science
Media, Mindset and Mandate Framing Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Delhi Assembly Election 2015
During Delhi Assembly Election 2015, beyond agenda setting, the journalists framed stories in such a way that they could influence the understanding of audience on crucial issues. But the mandate given by electors of Delhi not only surprised the political pundits but also the media specialists, who had a belief that framing stories in favour of a political party can easily influence the mind-set of electorates. This study presents the result of thematic and episodic analysis of media coverage of Delhi Assembly elections in two major dailies using a constructed sample of articles and news stories published during last four weeks of election campaign. The major findings of the study include: 1) Most news stories/ articles focused on episodic framing2) Stories which were over represented had inclination towards a particular political party or a candidate 3) The articles hardly used thematic framing which could have a positive impact on mind-set of electors 4) Despite all agenda setting and framing strategies the newspapers failed to manage mandate in favour of a particular political party 5) It’s not possible to change the mind-set of electors overnight. This study will guide media professionals to understand the limitations of agenda setting and framing and to improve the content of stories by incorporating more thematic stories which can improve the public understanding of issues that get converted into mandate.
The discourse in public space on media at the time of the 2014 Parliamentary elections to 543 seats in 28 states and 7 union territories with 814.5 million voters was characterized by two seemingly disparate but interconnected issues: first, that mainstream media was partisan and wavering in its loyalties to political parties; and secondly, an intense focus on the social media as the most effective means to reach the 23 million first-time voters in a nation with 16 per cent Internet penetration. This article explores the role of the mainstream media in the elections in the context of the shift in India's economic policy which has led to the prioritization of commercial interests by media while relegating other considerations to the background. As a result of the overriding commercial agenda of mainstream media, it has pushed political actors, activists and voters alike onto the new media space. The employment of new media space during the 2014 Indian elections is, thus, to be read in the context of mainstream media's role rather than in the context of new technologies' potential to impact upon democratic politics. It must be noted that media's disregard of other considerations, including ideology, however, cannot be construed as an argument that media were neutral.
Thesis; Election 2013 and print media coverage of PPP, PMLN and PTI.
This research present the content analysis of editorials published in leading daily Urdu newspapers, the daily Jang, the daily Express and the daily Dunya about Pakistan people’s Party(PPP), Pakistan Muslim Legue Nawaz (PMLN )and Pakistan Tehrik Insaf (PTI) during general election campaign 2013. The editorials of these three papers were selected for 48 days from 25th march 2013 to 11th may 2014. The study considered agenda setting theory to measure two variables “frequency and slant”. The researcher conducted a content analysis of editorials published on opinion pages on daily basis. The results depicts that all three newspapers treated each political party differently. Results show that out of 132 editorials, all newspapers gave huge coverage to PPP with 80 editorials while 32 editorials discussed PMLN sand 20 editorials discussed PTI. The daily Jang published 57 editorials followed by daily Dunya with 43 editorials and daily Express with 32 editorials. The results show that daily Jang favored PTI, daily Express favored PPP and daily Dunya favored PMLN. Key words: Election, Agenda Setting Theory, PPP, PTI, PMLN, Editorial, Jang, Express, Content analysis