States Face Fiscal Crunch after 1990s Spending Surge (original) (raw)
Across the nation, large budget gaps are forcing state governments to make tough policy choices. While some states are trying to control spending, others are turning to tax increases to balance their budgets. Some state officials are trying to pass the buck for their poor fiscal management by pleading for a bailout from Washington. But a bailout would encourage states to continue overspending, which is the source of the current fiscal mess. The states' mistake was to allow rapid tax revenue growth during the 1990s to fuel an unsustainable expansion in spending. Between fiscal years 1990 and 2001, state tax revenue grew 86 percent-more than the 55 percent of inflation plus population growth. If states had limited spending growth to that benchmark, budgets would have been $93 billion smaller by FY01representing savings roughly twice the size of today's state budget gaps. If revenue growth higher than the benchmark had been given back to taxpayers in permanent tax cuts and annual rebates, rebates could have been temporarily suspended during FY02 and FY03 to provide a cushion with which to balance state budgets. Current budget gaps provide policymakers an opportunity to weed out the budget excesses built up during the past decade. Yet overall state spending continues to grow. After soaring 8.0 percent in FY01, state general fund spending has not been cut in FY02 or FY03 even as large budget gaps have appeared. States should impose tax and spending growth caps to prevent budgets from growing too quickly during the next boom. Revenue growth above a benchmark would be given back in tax cuts and tax rebates. That would prevent spending from increasing too quickly and provide the option of suspending rebates during slowdowns to close budget gaps without the damage caused by tax rate increases.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Tax and Spending Limits: Theory, Analysis, and Policy
2004
This study surveys the literature on tax and spending limits (TELs). The recent literature includes more rigorous econometric analysis, and more thorough case studies of TELs in individual states. These studies provide important insights into the design and implementation of TELs. Recent empirical studies support the 'public choice' view that budget institutions significantly affect fiscal policy. TELs, as well as other budget rules, can significantly reduce state and local spending. However, decision makers must pay attention to the design of TELs if they are to have a significant impact in constraining government spending. The most effective TELs are ones that: a. are constitutional rather than statutory b. limit the growth of government spending to inflation and population growth rather than other aggregate measures of economic activity c. provide for immediate refunds of surplus revenue above the TEL limit d. are linked to other budget rules, most importantly to balanced budget requirements.
2021
Research suggests that a solution to Illinois' current fiscal crisis will require a "grand plan" with multiple revenue increases, multiple spending cuts, and multiple years of adjustment. Extraordinary budgeting mechanisms may be required to achieve political consensus on and implement such a plan. This article provides an overview of some public budget enforcement mechanisms designed to facilitate long-term fiscal stability in the U.S and around the world.<br>Our review finds that a large number of budget enforcement mechanisms designed to encourage fiscal discipline and long-term budget sustainability have been used by governments world-wide. Mechanisms include: procedural rules designed to make budget imbalances transparent; numerical triggers designed to make automatic adjustments in spending and revenue should budget gaps appear; and explicit constraints on revenues or spending designed to shrink the size of government. Rigorous investigations of the mechani...
U.S. States' fiscal constraints and effects on budget policies
The article looks at fiscal constraints adopted by the U.S. States. It questions the ability of those rules to determine sound budgetary policies. To assess this point it analyses, in the general part, the major kind of constraints so far adopted. Of each major category the focus is upon institutional weaknesses that create the room for the adoption of circumventing practices. The following section focuses instead on three case studies, to show examples of the way in which the constraints influenced policy-making without mining the ability of government to adopt unbalanced budgetary policies. The weaknesses are combined with the adoption of a deferential approach by the Courts that generally legitimized the accounting devices adopted by the States. The outcome is a system in which budget policies are influenced by several factors that go beyond the institutional framework. On the other side, legal boundaries create distortions and unwanted effects in policies implemented by the States.
Revenue trade-offs: Implications for state Government finance
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1983
Modifications in state level fiscal structures to address inequitable tax burdens or the issue of public sector growth have been accomplished by substituting one tax for another or by adjusting rates of existing taxes. This paper presents this fiscal adjustment process on the state level in terms of a policy in which complementary or competitive taxes are jointly determined as a tax mix in a process of revenue trade-offs.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.