A framework for the development of community health agency partnerships (original) (raw)

Partnerships in Public Health : Lessons from Knowledge Translation 1 Partnerships in Public Health : Lessons from Knowledge Translation and Program Planning Running head : Partnerships in Public Health : Lessons from Knowledge Translation

2017

The purpose of this study was to better understand how partnerships are initiated, maintained and sustained in public health practice. Design A qualitative design was employed through individual interviews and focus groups. Sample Participants included practitioners from six purposefully selected Ontario public health units who developed partnerships in program planning. Findings Partnerships play an essential role in program planning, but minimal information is available regarding the partnership process. Most partnerships are formed on an ad hoc basis, with little formalization. Public health professionals rely on their experiential knowledge when seeking out and working with partners. Implications Findings from our research can inform future public health planning processes and strengthen the formation and maintenance of partnerships in public health, and other sectors. Understanding how partnerships are initiated, maintained and sustained is an important first step for supporting the use of research to advance collaborative public health efforts.

Partnerships as knowledge encounters: A psychosocial theory of partnerships for health and community development

2014

In this article, we present a psychosocial theory of partnership, illustrated with case studies from Cambodia and Brazil. Partnerships are conceptualised as encounters with the knowledge of self and others, entailing processes of representation and communication between all stakeholders involved, and shaped by institutional and sociocultural contexts. We argue that partnership is an evolving practice that requires critical reflection and the creation of enabling institutional contexts. As such, it must be understood not as a tool for intervention, but as part of the intervention and definition of success.

Initiating, developing and sustaining social partnerships through partnership work

2005

Social partnerships are increasingly seen as a means by which both government and nongovernment agencies can identify and respond to localised need. This paper reports the findings of the first phase of the project that aims to inform how best social partnerships can be formed and developed to support vocational education and training at the local level. This phase sought to identify key principles and practices that will underpin this aim, using the experiences of 10 existing social partnerships. A key finding was the importance of partnership work. This is detailed through five dimensions of partnership work, and principles and practices that were identified and verified as most likely assisting the development and transformation of social partnerships over time. The dimensions of 'partnership work' comprise (i) cultural scoping work; (ii) connection building work; (iii) capacity building work; (iv) collective work, and (v) trust building work. The principles manifest with subtle differences at the initial and later stages of partnership work, include developing and maintaining: (i) shared goals; (ii) relations with partners; (iii) capacity for partnership work; (iv) governance and leadership, and (v) trust and trustworthiness. The specific implications for VET will be explored in the next phase of this project. Social partnerships In Australia, and worldwide, governments, civic organizations and global agencies, including those associated with vocational education and training (VET), are increasingly valuing social partnerships as means to understand and address local and regional concerns and for building social capital. 'Social partnerships' are localised networks that connect some combination of local community groups, education and training providers, industry and government to work on local issues and community-building activities (Seddon & Billett 2004). Social partnerships hold the prospect of engaging communities with government and non-government organizations in solving problems, making decisions, and negotiating desirable outcomes cooperatively. They are seen as a way to assist collaborative decision-making and build local capacity in ways that support economic, social and civic development attuned to local needs and circumstances. By its very nature, a partnership requires partners to collaborate in achieving common goals. However, the process of working together is complex and challenging, and at times contested. It requires partners and participants to understand that effective social partnerships work in specific ways directed towards shared goals or more likely, a common focus. This paper reports on a NVTRE funded research project to investigate the formation, development and continuity of in social partnerships in order to understand how best they might be initiated and developed. The project reviewed the workings and

Sustainability of Collaborative Capacity in Community Health Partnerships

Medical Care Research and Review, 2003

Sustainability is a key requirement for partnership success and a major challenge for such organizations. Despite the critical importance of sustainability to the success of community health partnerships and the many threats to sustainability, there is little evidence that would provide partnerships with clear guidance on long-term viability. This article attempts to (1) develop a conceptual model of sustainability in community health partnerships and (2) identify potential determinants of sustainability using comparative qualitative data from four partnerships from the Community Care Network (CCN) Demonstration Program. Based on a grounded theory examination of qualitative data from 130S the CCN evaluation, the authors hypothesize that there are five primary attributes/activities of partnerships leading to consequential value and eventually to sustainability of collaborative capacity. They include outcomes-based advocacy, vision-focus balance, systems orientation, infrastructure development, and community linkages. The context in which the partnership operates provides the conditions for determining the appropriateness and relative impact of each of the factors related to creating consequential value in the partnership.

Partnerships in public health: lessons from knowledge translation and program planning

The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmières, 2012

The purpose of this study was to better understand how partnerships are initiated, maintained, and sustained in public health practice. A qualitative design was employed to conduct individual interviews and focus groups. The participants included practitioners from 6 purposively selected public health units in the Canadian province of Ontario that developed partnerships in program planning. It was found that partnerships play an essential role in program planning but that minimal information is available regarding the partnership process. Most partnerships are formed on an ad hoc basis, with little formalization. Public health professionals rely on their experiential knowledge when seeking out and working with partners.These findings can serve to inform future public health planning and strengthen the formation and maintenance of partnerships in public health and other sectors. Understanding how partnerships are initiated, maintained, and sustained is an important first step in supp...

A vision for progress in community health partnerships

Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2007

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an increasingly used approach for conducting research to improve community health. Using Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory as a framework, it follows that future adoption of CBPR will occur if academic and community partners perceive CBPR to have greater relative advantage, compatibility, trialability, and observability, and less complexity than other research approaches. We propose that articles published in our new peer-reviewed journal--Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action (PCHP)--can influence academic and community partners' perceptions of CBPR that promote its adoption. Eight areas of scholarly activity are described that can promote health partnership research, education, and action: (1) original research, (2) work-in-progress and lessons learned, (3) policy and practice, (4) theory and methods, (5) education and training, (6) practical tools, (7) systematic reviews, and (8) c...

A Successful Community-Based Partnership: Formation and Achievements

2000

The formation and achievements of an academic,community partnership between the Department of Nursing, College of Allied Health Professions, Temple University, and two Philadelphia public housing developments are the focus of this article. One community,developed, community,based public health minitiative, Lead Awareness: North Philly Style, demonstrates the positive effect of the relationship.