Bibliography of Legal History Articles Appearing in Law Library Journal, Volumes 1-94 (1908-2002 (original) (raw)

The Twenty-First Century Law Library

2009

On November 6, 2008, the J. Michael Goodson Law Library at the Duke University School of Law held a number of events in celebration of its newly renovated and expanded space. This is an edited version of the program, "The 2 1st Century Law Library: A Conversation," that was held as part of that celebration.

Disciplinary Evolution and Scholarly Expansion: Legal History in the United States

The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2006

The study and teaching of legal history has flourished in the last few decades in the United States. This progression has been augmented by several key factors. First, digital sources have made legal and historical documents widely accessible. A chief difficulty scholars once faced while teaching legal history was a limited access to important documents; printed scholarly journals are expensive to produce, buy, and store. However, the advent of digital technology has provided greater ease of access to once difficult to obtain sources. For example, scholars at Yale Law School’s Avalon Project placed essential documents on the Internet, where they can be viewed easily and for free. Reprints of classic texts allow for inexpensive and easy access to old and rare documents. A second contributing factor to the growth of legal history scholarship is the increasing acceptance of dual-degree legal historians in both law schools and history faculties. Older and more mature dual-degree holders have blazed a path for a younger generation of legal historians. By training and finding employment for their younger counterparts, these older legal historians have a powerful effect on the discipline. A third factor contributing to this growth is the increased interest in several subjects within the field of legal history, such as: the history of legal writing; law and war; courts and judicial review; civil rights; medieval and English law; Islamic law; legal institutions; as well as historically significant individuals in the field of law. These advances in access to historical legal documents coupled with an expansion of subjects covered will alter how legal history is viewed and developed. One goal of legal history scholars is for lawyers to perceive issues of U.S. law as questions of legal history.

Symposium Introduction - The Law Librarian's Role in the Scholarly Enterprise

The Journal of Law of Education, 2010

The law library is an essential component of legal education for many reasons relating both to the physical and human resources in the law library. Librarians perform an important function as intermediaries between information and its users, both students and faculty, and they are experts in establishing the authority of legal information. The legal academic world is becoming more and more interdisciplinary and empirical, and legal scholarship thrives on complex and sophisticated research. Aside from the librarian's role as guardians of knowledge, librarians also need to provide more sophisticated services to faculty members related to their research. Becoming an integral part of the research team with faculty allows librarians to add value to the scholarly enterprise in anticipation of scholarly needs, not merely in response to individual research requests received out of context. The papers in this issue of the Journal of Law and Education and the others presented at a confere...

The Cambridge History of Law in America

2008

This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutoty ex~eption and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements. no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 106:1 [2014-5] It’s All Enumerative: Reconsidering Library of

2014

Ms. Hallows investigates the widespread use of the Library of Congress Classification system in U.S. law libraries and the difficulties it can present in some circumstances. To address these problems, she proposes that smaller law libraries that do not par-ticipate in a bibliographic utility may benefit from an in-house classification scheme.

Foreword: The Books of Justices

Michigan Law Review

For this Michigan Law Review issue devoted to recently published books about law, I thought it would be interesting to see what books made an appearance in the past year’s work of the Supreme Court. I catalogued every citation to every book in those forty opinions in order to see what patterns emerged: what books the justices cited, which justices cited which books, and what use they made of the citations. To begin with, I should define what I mean by “books". For the purposes of this Foreword, I excluded some types of reading matter that may have a book-like appearance or that others might view as a book: government reports and statistical compilations, including the Federal Sentencing Guidelines; the Model Penal Code; the Congressional Record; the Federal Register; and other current compilations of statutes or regulatory codes. (I include some older compilations as primary source material, e.g., a volume of the Vermont State Papers 1779– 1786, published in 1823 and cited by C...

Roger K. Newman, editor, The Yale Biographical Dictionary of American Law, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2009. Pp. xiii + 622. $65.00 (ISBN 978-0-300-11300-6)

Law and History Review, 2010

There is an interesting section on the transition to the job-the heavy learning curve, the problems of getting an office running, and the remarkable variety of cases federal judges confront. The chapter on the nature of the job holds few surprises. Most judges like the job with its broad range of subjects and conflicts, although there are complaints about the isolation. It is, though, disturbing to see such distinguished judges and ex-judges as Abner Mikva, Robert Bork, and James Buckley agreeing, at least on their notable Court of Appeals (D.C. Cir.), that after the conference on a case, the judge will go back and likely never speak again in person with his colleagues about it. When coupled with the "revelation" in another chapter that the law clerks are chiefly responsible for opinions (183), one cannot help wondering what creative, thoughtful, and analytical work federal judges are actually doing. A chapter partially named "Getting Along with Others" encompasses Alfred Goodwin's (9th Cir.) discussion of political trials. There is an interesting, though troubling, discussion of past tensions on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and two pages allotted to Andrew Hauk's (C.D. Cal.) oral history demonstrating his "outrageous rudeness." Finally, Joyce Hens Green sums up what makes a good judge: "A judge has to have courage and express the way it is in her opinions, whether oral or written, not just to ride with the waves of the time, economically, politically, emotionally" (212). Both specialists and nonspecialists will learn from Domnarski's book. Nonspecialists will receive a painless introduction to the lives of federal judges and the conditions under which they work. The scholar will pick up a variety of interesting tidbits with a reminder of what a valuable resource for research on the courts oral histories can be.

Legal and Constitutional History

A decade ago I contributed to the Annual Survey of American Law my first review of the literature in the field of American legal history.' This year I would like to look back over the past ten with the hope of identifying at least some of the continuities and changes in the literature during that period. Continuities in the Literature.-Many legal historians continue to concentrate on discussions of factual data in their writings about the American legal past. Some legal historians, such as Robert Mennel in Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1825-1940,2 have enlarged our factual knowledge on a variety of narrow topics. 3 Others are still writing books and articles which do little other than cover familiar factual ground. 4 Such works include Alan Reitman's