Policies for Equality Under Low or No Growth: A Model Inspired by Piketty (original) (raw)
Related papers
Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations
Ecological Economics, 2016
This paper explores the hypothesis (most notably made by French economist Thomas Piketty) that slow growth rates lead to rising inequality. If true, this hypothesis would pose serious challenges to achieving 'prosperity without growth' or meeting the ambitions of those who call for an intentional slowing down of growth on ecological grounds. It would also create problems of social justice in the context of a 'secular stagnation'. The paper describes a closed, demand-driven, stock-flow consistent model of Savings, Inequality and Growth in a Macroeconomic framework (SIGMA) with exogenous growth and savings rates. SIGMA is used to examine the evolution of inequality in the context of declining economic growth. Contrary to the general hypothesis, we find that inequality does not necessarily increase as growth slows down. In fact, there are certain conditions under which inequality can be reduced significantly, or even eliminated entirely, as growth declines. The paper discusses the implications of this finding for questions of employment, government fiscal policy and the politics of de-growth.
Income Inequality and Economic Growth
2008
Despite the extensive existing literature on income inequality and economic growth, there remains considerable disagreement on the effect of inequality on economic growth. Existing literatures find either a positive or a negative relationship. In this paper, we attempt to theoretically examine that relationship with a stochastic optimal growth model. We make the disagreement clear within a single model. We conclude (i) that both are possible-that is, higher inequality can retard growth in the early stage of economic development, and can encourage growth in a near steady state, (ii) that income redistribution by high income tax does not always reduce income inequality. Income inequality can be reduced by higher income tax in a near steady state, but it cannot be reduced in the early stage of economic development, and (iii) that two government polices-rapid economic growth and low income inequality-can be achieved by low income tax in the early stage of economic development, but both cannot be achieved simultaneously in a near steady state.
Inequality Is Bad for Growth of the Poor (But Not for That of the Rich)
The paper assesses the impact of overall inequality, as well as inequality among the poor and among the rich, on the growth rates along various percentiles of the income distribution. The analysis uses micro-census data from U.S. states covering the period from 1960 to 2010. The paper finds evidence that high levels of inequality reduce the income growth of the poor and, if anything, help the growth of the rich. When inequality is deconstructed into bottom and top inequality, the analysis finds that it is mostly top inequality that is holding back growth at the bottom.
The tradeoff between inequality and growth
2003
Is there a trade-off between inequality and economic growth? The theory and the evidence are so far inconclusive. So far the theory and the evidence are inconclusive. We want to construct a political economy model of growth to demonstrate that excessive inequality can disrupt the economy by inviting political interference through rent-seeking behavior and appropriation, but that policies supporting some modest inequality to take advantage of productivity differences can lead to the best growth rates. Thus we show that the relation between inequality and growth may be mildly hump-shaped: growth may rise modestly at first, as we move away from complete equality, and then drop again as inequality increases further.
Inequality may retard growth but sometimes progressive redistribution makes it worse
We provide an empirically plausible endogenous growth model to prove analyti- cally that sometimes a progressive redistribution from rich to poor lowers the growth rate of consumption per capita in all subsequent periods. The model accommodates the growth retarding effect of income inequality by combining the assumptions of no credit market and a production technology with diminishing returns to the com- bined inputs of physical and human capital. Also, to make the model's assumptions consistent with the evidence reported by leading labor economists, we assume that the parental human capital sufciently improves the effectiveness of expenditure on a child's education, in order to induce increasing returns to scale in the education technology. A reduction in the progressivity of redistribution, under such educa- tion technology, enhances the average human capital of all future cohorts of parents, which in turn boosts the growth rate of average human capital. The immediate re...
2011
This thesis assesses the social-welfare implications of modifications to the post transfer distribution of income, in the context of welfare maximising policy design. Both the inequality-distributional efficiency and inequality-growth relationship are assessed. An Atkinson social welfare function is employed in a novel fashion to model the inequality distributional efficiency relationship, including direct effects that result from the concavity of the personal utility function, and external losses operating via positional income effects. This analysis produces estimates of the social welfare losses from inequality across a data set of 137 countries, where the unweighted average of total losses is found to be equivalent to be 47% of GNI. The equality-growth relationship is analysed from the standpoint of both endogenous growth theory and post-Keynesian theories of demand and investment. The relationships between the functional and personal distribution of income and key macroeconomic variables including the rate of savings, and physical and human capital accumulation are assessed. Crucially, these relationships are found to be highly modifiable by economic policy and structural reform, and in theory, no growth–equality trade off need exist. On the contrary, equality may be growth promoting at moderate to high inequality levels. Combined with the large static welfare losses from inequality uncovered in this analysis, the welfare optimum level of inequality is likely to be close to the level associated with distributional efficiency maximisation. This is likely to be a very low level of inequality in comparison to existing levels in most countries and regions, and large welfare losses result from levels of inequality significantly above this level.
Income Inequality and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries
European Journal of Business and Management, 2016
Recent researches [Atkinson, Piketty and Saez, 2010, 2013] have shaken the foundations of income inequality that, for three decades, monopolized economics. In this paper, we will try to summarize this work, to study the role of the tax system in reducing income inequality and analyze the impact of the latter on economic growth in the OECD countries. Keywords: Income inequality, Taxation, redistribution of income, economic growth JEL classification: D23, P1, H23, O17, Q49.
Policy Options for Reducing Inequality
While poverty has declined in many developing countries in the last two decades, inequality has not. As a result, the rich in those economies are now growing richer much faster than the poor. It also delays poverty reduction, if the benefits of growth are not equitably distributed. Finally it may create social tensions and political instability. Despite the obvious need to address inequality, it has declined only in a few countries. The primary focus of this paper is to discuss the policy instruments that have been used by those governments for reducing inequality of incomes and consumption between individuals (vertical inequality) and groups (horizontal inequality) within the country in the last two decades.