Middle Ages à la carte: meanings, tensions and challenges of medievalism (original) (raw)
Related papers
Modern Views of Marginality in Pre-Industrial Europe
Collection Management, 1992
For those of us whose working lives are ruled by bureaucratic hierarchies and organization charts, it may seem strange to think about research based on the importance of the marginal. It may seem even stranger to accept a theory that the coherence of a society.can be fully understood only by studying its fringes as well as its center. Yet this theory is at the very heart of an enormous body of historical research and publishing that continues to flourish. The focus of this research is on society's marginsindividuals or groups outside the norms of convention or law. They include not just the poor and criminals, but also any person or group considered to be deviant, including the mentally ill and those whose sexual practices were thought to be unlawful or sinful. Since the 1960s, there has been growing fascination with segments of European society outside the bounds of power, convention, and law. To indicate the time period under consideration, I use the term "pre-industrial," though the focus of this essay will be mainly on the earlymodern period (roughly the 16th through 18th centuries). Certainly poverty and crime of that time, both separately and in their very close relationship, have always been subjects of historical research. They have also been prominent in popular histories and literary works depicting not just the .victim of social injustice, but also the picaresque hero or romanticized vagabond. During the past quarter century, however, a predictable amount of academic publishing became a phenomenon: publications in
Living in-between: The Uses of Marginality in Sociological Theory
it may seem that the concept of marginality has already been thoroughly studied and some- times even considered as a useless and obsolete theoretical notion. however, in this article i develop the notion in a novel way with regard to recent theoretical debates on the social im- plications of shifting borderlines in the contemporary world. The notion of “marginal man” introduced by Robert Park is central for my approach since it embodies the “spatial—social” interaction. i construct and use the nexus of space, time and movement to account for the an- alytical capacities of this concept. The article covers mainly the spatial aspects of marginality and its connotations. i outline two main approaches to the ideal type of the “marginal man” in the paper: 1) the spatial-functional approach (traced back to simmel’s notion of stranger), which focuses on the essential functions of stranger for a group border, and 2) “formal”— making approach to multiple borders (and particularly shifting ones) that shape “marginal’s” identification as placed in-between borders and challenge the orderliness of bordered space. The central task of the marginality research is not to classify different “strangers” and “mar- ginals”, or to describe their conditions, self-identities, and psychological controversies, but to depict social processes responsible for “marginalization”, exclusion, and enabling liminal positions. in this article i argue that the analytical vista of the “marginality” concept can be extended beyond the individual/personal framework and include social institutions (in the example of citizenship). Keywords: space, border, frontier, marginality, marginal man, stranger, movement, citizenship
Marginality in the socio-philosophical and juridical dimensions: the experience of an interdisciplinary approach, 2019
This article is devoted to the problem of social marginality, considered in the research key of social philosophy and the general theory of law. In recent decades, the socio-cultural reality has been significantly transformed: in the life of modern society penetrated the latest information technologies that have arisen due to the rapid development of electronics, in addition, there was the formation and spread of a new type of attitude and worldview, which was conceptualized in the philosophical, cultural, religious and other practices of globalizing space today. The epistemic field that exists between the two disciplinary practices (theory of law and social philosophy) allows us to see marginalization as an epiphenomenon of transformations of modern society. The authors begin their theoretical and applied study of marginality with a comprehensive study of its generic property, i.e. with a study of marginality as such. In this paper, we analyze the semantic and etymological meanings of marginality, consider a wide range of philosophical, sociological and historiographic issues, legal aspects that explain the generic properties of marginality, which allows, in the authors' opinion, to identify the essential and cognitive aspects of this phenomenon, to establish a causal complex of mutual influence marginality on the state of social order as well as offense, and vice versa
Models of Marginality in the Historical-Theoretical and Political-Legal Contexts
Models of Marginality in the Historical-Theoretical and Political-Legal Contexts, 2020
The research analyzes different models of marginality in historical-legal and political-legal contexts. The relevance of the study is due to the significant risks of spreading marginality in modern society, as a prerequisite for legal anomia. Understanding marginality, as one of the destructive forms of legal awareness and legally significant limiting behavior, allows marginality to be modeled historically and theoretically in relation to sociocultural phenomena such as state and law. At the methodological level, documentary design was used close to historical research and epistemological reflection typical of interdisciplinary dialogue. It is concluded that the use of legal means and techniques to combat marginality is based on the hypothesis of legal consciousness, according to which anyone initially focuses on consciousness, socially active and useful, and therefore on lawful behavior established by law. This approach can be formed, strengthened, or restored through the implementation of educational, ideological, and other functions of law, political science, or history.
This Academic Meetings seek to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the discussion of all aspects of medieval studies. Each Congress has one particular special thematic strand on an area of interdisciplinary study in a wider context. Next Autumn the city of Nájera (La Rioja, Spain) will once again host the International Meetings of the Middle Ages, organized by the Medieval Research Group of the University of Cantabria, supported by the Town council of Nájera, Dirección General de Cultura de la Consejería de Desarrollo Económico e Innovación de La Rioja, Escuela de Patrimonio Histórico de Nájera, Instituto de Estudios Riojanos, University of Cantabria, Sociedad Española de Estudios Medievales, Instituto de Estudos Medievais de la Universidade Nova de Lisboa and the Government of Spain. The international conference will take place in Nájera (Spain), from 8th to 10th November, 2017
The Marginalists’ Foundations of Modern Sociology
Edulight, 2018
Two names of social scientists are mentionable for the popularity of ‘Marginal’ concept in sociology. Both of them belong to America. The first one is Robert Ezra Park and the other is Everett V. Stonequist. Park is noted for his thought on ‘Urban Sociology’ and ‘Human Ecology’. In his concept ‘marginal position’ is the result of ‘social control’ and helps to establish social order. This idea has been differently extended by his student Stonequist. He saw the negative effects of cultural marginality in personality construction. ‘Alien’ identity clutches a marginal man, who ‘poised in psychological uncertainty between two or more social worlds’. Chicago School identified marginal personality as a condition of cultural composition. This positional aspect denotes a ‘time and space’ relationship, which is a crucial element of methodological foundation of modern sociology. This essay is an endeavour to trace the sociological link with marginalist foundations in a way of development of its modern forms, where marginal is overcast with relative weakness.