Comparison of the immunogenicity of different therapeutic preparations of human factor VIII in the murine model of hemophilia A (original) (raw)
Related papers
Alloantibodies to therapeutic factor VIII in hemophilia A the role of
The rising incidence of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against therapeutic factor VIII prompted the conduct of studies to answer the question as to whether this rise is related to the introduction of recombinant factor VIII products. The present article summarizes current opinions and results of non-clinical and clinical studies on the immunogenic potential of recombinant compared to plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates. Numerous studies provided circumstantial evidence that von Willebrand factor, the natural chaperone protein present in plasma-derived factor VIII products, plays an important role in protecting exogenous factor VIII from uptake by antigen presenting cells and from recognition by immune effectors. However, the definite contribution of von Willebrand factor in reducing the inhibitor risk and in the achievement of immune tolerance is still under debate.
Haemophilia, 2007
In patients with haemophilia A, factor VIII (FVIII) therapy leads to the development of anti-FVIII alloantibodies that inhibit FVIII pro-coagulant activity, in up to 25% of the cases. At a time when efficient viral screening procedures are at place, development of inhibitors poses the greatest threat to haemophilia A patients. Various risk factors, both patient and product-related, are responsible for the development of inhibitory antibodies. The role of FVIII-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes in the initiation of the humoral immune response to exogenous FVIII has been well. In view of their capacity to stimulate naïve T cells, dendritic cells (DCs) play a central role in the initiation of the primary immune response. Thus, in the context of a primary alloimmunization against FVIII, i.e. when FVIII-specific B lymphocytes are not there to take up FVIII from the circulation and to serve as antigen presenting cells (APCs), DCs are the only cell type that internalize FVIII, leading to activation of FVIII-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes. von Willebrand factor (VWF) present in plasmaderived FVIII therapeutic concentrates, is known to act as a chaperone molecule for procoagulant FVIII. In addition to its role in reducing the ÔantigenicityÕ of FVIII, the role of VWF in the reduction of the ÔimmunogenicityÕ of therapeutic FVIII in patients with haemophilia A has also been suggested. We have recently demonstrated that VWF protects FVIII from being endocytosed by human DCs and subsequently being presented to FVIII-specific T cells. We propose that VWF may reduce the immunogenicity of FVIII by preventing, upstream from the activation of immune effectors, the entry of FVIII in professional antigen presenting cells.
American Journal of Hematology, 2007
A relevant aspect in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A (HA) presenting inhibitor against factor VIII (FVIII) is the different antigenicity of FVIII used for replacement therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of different products, with variable von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentration, in preventing the binding of inhibitor to FVIII. The reactivity of inhibitors from plasma of 18 patients with HA versus three commercial concentrates containing different amounts of vWF was compared. The results show that increasing amounts of vWF might have a protective effect on the transfused FVIII inactivation. Am.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009
Factor VIII is a multi-domain glycoprotein and is an essential cofactor in the blood coagulation cascade. Its deficiency or dysfunction causes Hemophilia A, a bleeding disorder. Replacement using exogenous recombinant Factor VIII (FVIII) is the first line of therapy for Hemophilia A. Immunogenicity, the development of binding (total) and neutralizing (inhibitory) antibody against administered protein is a clinical complication of the therapy. There are several product related factors such as presence of aggregates, route and frequency of administration and glycosylation have been shown to contribute to immunogenicity. The effect of route of administration of Factor VIII on antibody development in Hemophilia A is not completely understood. Here we investigated the effect of route of administration (sc or iv) on immunogenicity in Hemophilia A mice. The total and inhibitory titers were determined using ELISA and modified Bethesda Assay respectively. The results indicated that sc is more immunogenic compared to iv route in terms of total antibody titer development (binding antibodies) but no significant differences in inhibitory titer levels could be established.