Fragmentation of presidential elections and governability crises in Latin America: a curvilinear relationship? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Revista InterAção, 2023
The paper reviews explanations about presidential term interruptions in Latin America and applies them to the 2010s cases, which are: Fernando Lugo (Paraguay, 2012); Otto Pérez Molina (Guatemala, 2015); Dilma Rousseff (Brazil, 2016); Pedro Pablo Kuczynski (Peru, 2018); and Evo Morales (Bolivia, 2019). The study sample also includes Legislative decisions to discontinue processes against presidents of Guatemala (2017), Brazil (2017, twice), and Paraguay (2019). The QCA results give support for proposing an alternative to Pérez-Liñán’s (2014) two-level theory and adding a third level of contention related to military intervention, an old-fashioned variable that was decisive in the Evo Morales’ case. Besides having shields in the Legislative and on the streets, Latin American presidents need a shield provided by militarized security forces to protect them from term interruptions, since these corps have gained influence in the democratic politics of the region. Contrary to literature expectations, the presidential exits of the 2010s have not been enough to disperse political tension.
Party Institutionalization and the Removal of Presidential Term Limits in Latin America
An explanation of the recent wave of constitutional changes in favor of more permissive reelection rules in Latin America is presented based on a principal-agent model of intraparty relations within the presidential party. The theoretical model suggests causal mechanisms through which institutionalized presidential parties constrain the decision to scrap term limits. The theoretical implications are tested using both quantitative and qualitative evidence. Results from logistic regression suggest that the likelihood of removing term limits in Latin American countries (1990-2013) significantly declines with the level of presidential party institutionalization. Case study evidence illustrates the operation of the theoretically-derived causal mechanisms.
Estudios Políticos, 2019
The purpose of this article is to explore coalition formation in presidential systems using evidence from Latin America. It puts forward three hypotheses based on formateur power, electoral structures and party systems to explore when and why electoral and government coalition formation occurs. It uses evidence stemming from eighteen democratic presidential regimes in Latin America from 1980 to 2010. It looks at 100 elections and 407 aggregate years of democratic government. It analyses data organized in a cross-sectional time-series fashion through a logit function with random effects and robust standard errors. It finds that in democracies with weak presidents, restrictive electoral rules and highly fragmented party systems, the president will seek the support of multiple parties. While the effective number of parties is the most important determinant, rules related to legislative elections are more important predictors of electoral coalitions, and those related to presidential elections are more important predictors of government coalitions. The findings in this article are important insofar as yielding critical insight into partisan strategies in both the run-up to elections and the maintenance of governments, as well as contributing to a general theory of coalition formation.
Electoral Studies - ELECT STUD, 2001
The hypothesis that government turnover and attrition in the incumbent party share of the vote are more frequent and intense in non-industrialized countries (Latin America and the Caribbean area) than in industrialized countries, and the possible reasons for this difference, were explored through analysis of 328 post-war democratic elections. The data analyzed supported this hypothesis and therefore the conclusion that the structural economic situation of a country exerts a significant effect on voting behavior. This effect was found to be independent of occasional changes in the economy, electoral participation and of institutional factors such as re-election. However, the latter diminishes the frequency of turnover and the intensity of attrition in non-industrialized countries, and for this reason, its introduction could improve political continuity and policy stability.