A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit (original) (raw)
Related papers
Choosing a foveal goal recruits the saccadic system during smooth pursuit
Journal of Neurophysiology, 2018
Models of smooth pursuit eye movements stabilize an object’s retinal image, yet pursuit is peppered with small, destabilizing “catch-up” saccades. Catch-up saccades might help follow a small, spot stimulus used in most pursuit experiments, since fewer of them occur with large stimuli. However, they can return when a large stimulus has a small central feature. It may be that a central feature on a large object automatically recruits the saccadic system. Alternatively, a cognitive choice is made that the feature is the pursuit goal, and the saccadic system is then recruited to pursue it. Observers pursued a 5-dot stimulus composed of a central dot surrounded by four peripheral dots arranged as a diamond. An attention task specified the pursuit goal as either the central element, or the diamond gestalt. Fewer catch-up saccades occurred with the Gestalt goal than with the central goal, although the additional saccades with the central goal neither enhanced nor impeded pursuit. Furthermo...
Shared attention for smooth pursuit and saccades
Journal of Vision, 2013
Identification of brief luminance decrements on parafoveal stimuli presented during smooth pursuit improves when a spot pursuit target is surrounded by a larger random dot cinematogram (RDC) that moves with it (Heinen, Jin, & Watamaniuk, 2011). This was hypothesized to occur because the RDC provided an alternative, less attention-demanding pursuit drive, and therefore released attentional resources for visual perception tasks that are shared with those used to pursue the spot. Here, we used the RDC as a tool to probe whether spot pursuit also shares attentional resources with the saccadic system. To this end, we set out to determine if the RDC could release attention from pursuit of the spot to perform a saccade task. Observers made a saccade to one of four parafoveal targets that moved with the spot pursuit stimulus. The targets either moved alone or were surrounded by an RDC (100% coherence). Saccade latency decreased with the RDC, suggesting that the RDC released attention needed to pursue the spot, which was then used for the saccade task. Additional evidence that attention was released by the RDC was obtained in an experiment in which attention was anchored to the fovea by requiring observers to detect a brief color change applied 130 ms before the saccade target appeared. This manipulation eliminated the RDC advantage. The results imply that attentional resources used by the pursuit and saccadic eye movement control systems are shared.
Coordination of smooth pursuit and saccades
Vision Research, 2006
Smooth pursuit and saccades are two components of tracking eye movements. Their coordination has usually been studied by investigating latencies of pursuit onset in response to a moving target appearing simultaneously with the disappearance of the stationary fixation target. The general finding from such studies has been that latencies of saccades and pursuit are different and reflect independent processes. We discuss several limitations of the used targets. In this paper, we study latencies of saccades and smooth pursuit in response to a moving target that overlaps in time with a pursued moving target. We find that saccades and pursuit changes are synchronized. Furthermore, pursuit changes are made fast. Directional changes occur almost entirely within the accompanying saccade. To explain the results we hypothesize a two-stage mechanism for the coordinated generation of saccades and pursuit.
Accuracy of eye position for saccades and smooth pursuit
2016
In this study, we address the question of whether a target is foveated during smooth pursuit. Specifically, we examine whether smooth pursuit eye movements land near the center-of-mass of the target, as is the case for saccades. To that end, we instructed eight untrained, healthy participants to follow moving targets, presented monocularly in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Stimuli moved either in a modified step-ramp (smooth pursuit), or made a single step (saccade), stepping 6° from the center. Targets were ring-shaped and either 0.6° or 1.7° in diameter. In an additional set of experiments, two participants collected more extensive data on smooth pursuit and saccades for a larger range of target sizes (0.6°, 1.7°, or 4.3°). During pursuit, eyes were rarely placed at target center, even when participants' fixational stability was taken into account. Furthermore, there was a clear tendency for distance from target center to increase with target size. This outcome was in contrast to saccades, where there was no effect of target size across participants. The difference in foveal placement between the two types of eye movements is consistent with their different purposes: closer inspection of the target for saccades versus maintenance of the target in the visual field for smooth pursuit.
Two Distinct Visual Motion Mechanisms for Smooth Pursuit: Evidence from Individual Differences
Neuron, 2007
Smooth pursuit eye velocity to a moving target is more accurate after an initial catch-up saccade than before, an enhancement that is poorly understood. We present a novel individual differences based method for identifying mechanisms underlying a physiological response, and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre-and postsaccade. Correlating moment-to-moment measurements of pursuit over time with two psychophysical measures of speed estimation during fixation, we find two independent associations across individuals. Presaccadic pursuit acceleration is predicted by the precision of low level (motion energy based) speed estimation, and postsaccadic pursuit precision is predicted by the precision of high level (position tracking) speed estimation. These results suggest both that a low level motion signal may drive presaccadic acceleration, and that an independent high level motion signal may drive postsaccadic precision.
Smooth-pursuit eye velocity to a moving target is more accurate after an initial catch-up saccade than before, an enhancement that is poorly understood. We present an individualdifferences-based method for identifying mechanisms underlying a physiological response and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre-and postsaccade. Correlating moment-to-moment measurements of pursuit over time with two psychophysical measures of speed estimation during fixation, we find two independent associations across individuals. Presaccadic pursuit acceleration is predicted by the precision of low-level (motion-energy-based) speed estimation, and postsaccadic pursuit precision is predicted by the precision of high-level (position-tracking) speed estimation. These results provide evidence that a low-level motion signal influences presaccadic acceleration and an independent high-level motion signal influences postsaccadic precision, thus presenting a plausible mechanism for postsaccadic enhancement of pursuit.
Inhibition of saccade initiation by preceding smooth pursuit
Experimental brain research, 2003
In this study, we investigated the influence of smooth-pursuit eye movements on saccade initiation in response to a sudden jump of a continuously moving target. We replicated the finding by Tanaka et al. (1998) that saccadic eye movements in the direction opposite to preceding pursuit have longer latencies than those in the same direction. We confirmed that this asymmetry is indeed due to an inhibitory effect of smooth pursuit on saccade initiation in the opposite direction rather than facilitation of saccade initiation in the same direction. The inhibitory effect decreased strongly when subjects knew the jump direction in advance. This supports the notion that the prolonged latencies of backward saccades are not due to orbital mechanics or low-level motor processing. Furthermore, we found that the range of saccade directions inhibited by a pursuit movement is broad, covering all directions that did not have the same horizontal component as the pursuit direction. This is in contrast...
Evidence for synergy between saccades and smooth pursuit during transient target disappearance
Journal of neurophysiology, 2006
Visual tracking of moving objects requires prediction to compensate for visual delays and minimize mismatches between eye and target position and velocity. In everyday life, objects often disappear behind an occluder, and prediction is required to align eye and target at reappearance. Earlier studies investigating eye motion during target blanking showed that eye velocity first decayed after disappearance but was sustained or often recovered in a predictive way. Furthermore, saccades were directed toward the unseen ...