The effects of a large discrete maize price increase on the distribution of household welfare and poverty in rural Kenya 1 (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study estimates the effects of a large discrete maize price increase on the welfare of a sample of rural Kenyan households. The usual first-order welfare approximation formula is extended to a second-order formula that allows for supply and demand responses to the price change. Results show that many rural households are not affected greatly by the price change, and there are about as many gainers as losers. However, these full sample results mask important differences across regions. Welfare gains generally take place in major production areas while losses are in areas where most households are net buyers of maize. Semiparametric methods are used to investigate the relationship between income and the size of the welfare effect, and poverty dominance techniques are applied to study the impacts of the maize price increase on rural poverty.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (38)

  1. Atkinson, A., 1987. On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55, 749- 764.
  2. Barrett, C., Carter, M., 1997. Microeconomically coherent agricultural policy reform in Africa. In: Paulson, J. (Ed.), The Role of the State in Key Markets. Macmillan, London.
  3. Barrett, C.B., Dorosh, P.A., 1996. Farmers welfare and changing food prices: Nonparametric evidence from rice in Madagascar. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78, 656-669.
  4. Binswanger, H.P., 1978. Attitudes towards risk: Implications and psychological theories of an experiment in rural India. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 62, 395-401.
  5. Budd, J.W., 1993. Changing food prices and rural welfare: A nonparametric examination of the Cote d'Ivoire. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 41, 587-603.
  6. Chibber, A., 1989. The aggregate supply response: A survey. In: Commander, S. (Ed.) Structural Adjustment and Agriculture: Theory and Practice in Africa and Latin America. ODI, London.
  7. Deaton, A., 1989. Rice prices and income distribution in Thailand: A non- parametric analysis. Econ. J. 99, 1-37.
  8. Duclos, J.-Y., Makdissi, P., Wodon, Q.T., 2005. Poverty-dominant transfer pro- grams: The role of targeting and allocation rules. J. Dev. Econ. 77, 53-73.
  9. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W., Rice, J., Weiss, A., 1986. Semiparametric estimates of the relation between weather and electricity sales. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81, 310-320.
  10. Foster, J.E., Shorrocks A.F., 1988a. Poverty orderings. Econometrica 56, 173- 177.
  11. Foster, J.E., Shorrocks, A.F., 1988b. Poverty orderings and welfare dominance. Soc. Choice Welfare 5, 179-198.
  12. Foster, J.E., Greer J., Thorbecke, E., 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52, 761-766.
  13. Government of Kenya, 2007. Basic Report on Well-Being in Kenya Based on Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey-2005/06. Kenya Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning and National Development, Nairobi, Kenya.
  14. Green, P., Silverman, B.W., 1994. Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach. Monographs on Stat. and App. Prob. 58. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  15. Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K., 1988. The definition and measurement of poverty. J. Human Res. 23, 211-221.
  16. Hardle, W., 1990. Applied Nonparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  17. Hardle, W., Marron, J.S., 1985. Optimal bandwidth selection in non-parametric regression function estimation. Ann. Stat. 13, 1465-1481.
  18. Heckman, N.E., 1986. Spline smoothing in partly linear models. J. Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B 48, 244-248.
  19. Ivanic, M., Martin, W., 2008. Implications of higher global food prices for poverty in low-income countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4594. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  20. Jayne, T.S., Myers, R.J., Nyoro, J., 2008. The effects of NCPB marketing policies on maize market prices in Kenya. Agric. Econ. 38, 313-325.
  21. Karanja, D.K., 2003. The Impact of Maize Technologies on Income Distribu- tion in Marginal and High Potential Regions of Kenya. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  22. Kherallah, M., Delgado, C., Gabre-Madhin, E., Minot, N., Johnson, M., 2002. Reforming Agricultural Markets in Africa. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  23. Makdissi, P., Wodon, Q.T., 2002. Consumption dominance curves: Testing for the impact of indirect tax reforms on poverty. Econ. Lett. 75, 227-235.
  24. Myers, R.J., 2006. On the costs of food price fluctuations in low-income coun- tries. Food Pol. 31, 288-301.
  25. Nadaraya, E.A., 1964. On estimating regression. Theory Prob. Appl. 10, 186- 190.
  26. Newbery, D.M.G., Stiglitz, J.E., 1981. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabi- lization: A Study in the Economics of Risk. Oxford University Press, New York.
  27. Rao, M.R., 1988. Agricultural supply response: A survey. Ag. Econ. 3, 1- 22. Ravallion, M., 1990. Welfare changes of food price changes under induced wage responses: Theory and evidence for Bangladesh. Oxford Econ. Papers 42, 574-85.
  28. Ravallion, M., Bidani, B., 1994. How robust is a poverty profile? World Bank Econ. Rev. 8, 75-102.
  29. Ravallion, M., Van Der Walle, D., 1991. The impact on poverty of food pricing reforms: A welfare analysis for Indonesia. J. Pol. Model. 13, 281-299.
  30. Reutlinger, S., Selowsky, M., 1976. Malnutrition and Poverty: Magnitude and Policy Options. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  31. Rice, J., 1986. Convergence rates for partially splined models. Stat. Prob. Lett. 4, 203-208.
  32. Robinson, P.M., 1988. Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression. Econo- metrica 56, 931-954.
  33. Sahn, D.E., Stifel, D.C., 2000. Poverty comparisons over time and across coun- tries in Africa. World Dev. 28, 2123-2155.
  34. Schimek, M., 1997. Non-and semi-parametric alternatives to generalized linear models. Computat. Stat. 12, 173-191.
  35. Schluter, M.G., Mount, T.D., 1976. Some management objectives of risk aver- sion in the choice of cropping patterns, Surat District, India. J. Dev. Stud. 12, 246-261.
  36. Speckman, P., 1988. Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 50, 413-436.
  37. Subramanian, S., Deaton, A., 1996. The demand for food and calories. J. Pol. Econ. 104, 133-162.
  38. Watson, G.S., Smooth regression analysis. Shankya, Series A 26, 359- 372. World Bank, 1994. Adjustment in Africa: Reforms, Results and the Road Ahead. Oxford University Press, New York.