Living in the Shadows: Plight of the Undocumented (original) (raw)

Patchwork of promises: A critical analysis of immigration policies for unaccompanied undocumented children in the United States

Child & Family Social Work, 2018

In 2014, the United States saw a greater than 50% increase in the number of unaccompanied children from Mexico and Central America arriving at the U.S./Mexico border, and unaccompanied children continue to migrate to the United States in consistent numbers. The dramatic increase of 2014 exposed gaps in policies aimed at supporting unaccompanied children as they await legal adjudication. This paper begins with a historic review of immigration policies in the United States aimed at supporting unaccompanied migrant children. An analytic review is provided of existing immigration policies in the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Refugee Resettlement, highlighting the competing paradigms created by missions of security‐focused policy versus child‐centred policy. A close examination of the values that influenced policy development in this area is included, along with a discussion of how social work practice can infuse elements of social justice into immigration policy refo...

"We are not criminals": social work advocacy and unauthorized migrants

An estimated 9.3 million unauthorized migrants now work in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. (Passel, Capps, & Fix, 2004), taking unskilled jobs at low wages and prompting some lawmakers to call for tougher law enforcement or for measures to restrict access to health care and humanitarian assistance (Hancock, 2007). In what follows, I present empirical evidence of efforts by unauthorized Mexican migrants in one suburban town to contest the characterization of their presence as "illegal" or "criminal," negative labels that they believe are hindering their ability to support themselves and their families. This study will inform social work's advocacy on behalf of this population at national, state, and local levels. This examination is crucial for social work in settings in which practitioners will encounter migrants. The terms "illegal immigrant illegal immigrant n. an alien (non-citizen) who has entered the United States without government permission or stayed beyond the termination date of a visa. (See: alien) " and "illegal alien" clearly connote con·note tr.v. con·not·ed, con·not·ing, con·notes 1. To suggest or imply in addition to literal meaning: "The term 'liberal arts' connotes a certain elevation above utilitarian concerns" criminal status and thus, without scrutiny, could dissuade social workers from understanding the circumstances faced by individuals who enter the United States without authorization (Furman, Langer, Sanchez, & Negi, 2007; Hancock, 2007). Workers who see unauthorized migrants as criminals could feel less empathy for and be disinclined to engage with this population (Furman et al., 2007). Understanding how members of disadvantaged groups perceive themselves, rather than accepting characterizations from popular discourse, is a critical element of culturally competent practice (Lum n. 1. A chimney. 2. A ventilating chimney over the shaft of a mine. 3. A woody valley; also, a deep pool. , 2007).

Voice, Agency and Vulnerability: the Immigration of Children through Systems of Protection and Enforcement

International Migration

As the organizer of a 2009 summer workshop held at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University on unaccompanied, undocumented children in the United States, I am delighted to introduce the first in a series of publications that will contribute to a growing nationwide debate on the challenges facing this vulnerable population. First, a word of explanation about the workshop participants before describing matters of substance. I designed the workshop to bring together academics and practitioners who speak different professional languages, use different methodologies in their research and practice, disseminate their findings in different venues, and rarely have the opportunity, or perhaps even the inclination, to sit down together to share knowledge, to ask unexpected questions, and to debate the consequences of public policy decisions. The participants included three immigration attorneys, two law professors, two immigration judges, a specialist on child refugees within the Lutheran Immigrant and Refugee Service, a child psychiatrist, a developmental economist, a sociologist, and five anthropologists. In addition to their expertise in children, migration, and the law, participants were chosen for the ways their experience or training blurs the divide of the academic and practitioner and spans the private and public sectors. For example, some participants are employed by NGOs under contract to the government while others moved from government work to private research positions or currently combine teaching with legal practice. In this group, practitioners regularly publish and academics often consult. Five of the sixteen migrated to the United States, four speak English as a second language, fourteen have extensive international experience, and all have professional expertise in the legal and social issues raised by the migration of people across borders. Participants included Jacqueline Bhabha,

Charting Directions for Research on Immigrant Children Affected by Undocumented Status

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2017

Three groups of children from Mexico and Central America are vulnerable to effects of U.S. immigration policies: (1) foreign-born children who entered the United States with undocumented immigrant parents; (2) unaccompanied children who entered the United States alone; and (3) U.S.-born citizen-children of undocumented immigrant parents. Despite the recent demographic growth of these youth, scholarship on their strengths and challenges is under-theorized and isolated within specific disciplines. Hence, service providers, researchers, and policymakers have insufficient research to inform their efforts to support the children’s well-being. A group of scholars and service providers with expertise in immigrant children convened to establish consensus areas and identify gaps in knowledge of undocumented, unaccompanied, and citizen-children of undocumented immigrant parents. The primary goal was to establish a research agenda that increases interdisciplinary collaborations, informs clinic...

Mental Health Problems of Children of Undocumented Parents in the United States: A Hidden Crises

The ripple effects of immigration enforcement on the lives of citizen and undocumented children in the United States (U.S.) remain hidden. Amidst unpredictable and traumatic immigration enforcement policies and practices in the U.S., children of undocumented parents are exposed to stressors that severely threaten their mental well-being. A community-based participatory study revealed that many of these children suffer from considerable mental health problems. If immigration policies and practices in the U.S. do not change, millions of children will continue to suffer from their unmet mental health needs. Furthermore, these unmet mental health problems are likely to affect them into adulthood and engender a heavy human and economic cost for them and all of society.

Mental health of unaccompanied children: effects of U.S. immigration policies

BJPsych Open

Background There is an unprecedented surge of forcibly displaced people globally, with a crisis of unaccompanied minors seeking haven across the US border. Aims This paper aims to provide an understanding of the intersection between mental health and immigration policies. Method Examples of contemporary policies that focus on the deterrence, detention and deportation of unaccompanied minors in the USA, will be discussed, as well as the mental health effects of such ‘iron triangle’ immigration policies. Results In the ideal circumstances, systems and policies for migrant children would uphold international humanitarian law, hasten the shift from enforcement to protection, adhere to a ‘do no (further) harm’ model that uses a trauma-informed, culturally responsive approach to engaging with migrant children, engage the community as stakeholders to end detention and advocate to share the burden of responsibility. Conclusions Building a humanitarian response that protects both country and...

MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN OF UNDOCUMENTED PARENTS IN THE UNITED STATES: A HIDDEN CRISIS

The ripple effects of immigration enforcement on the lives of citizen and undocumented children in the United States (U.S.) remain hidden. Amidst unpredictable and traumatic immigration enforcement policies and practices in the U.S., children of undocumented parents are exposed to stressors that severely threaten their mental well-being. A community-based participatory study revealed that many of these children suffer from considerable mental health problems. If immigration policies and practices in the U.S. do not change, millions of children will continue to suffer from their unmet mental health needs. Furthermore, these unmet mental health problems are likely to affect them into adulthood and engender a heavy human and economic cost for them and all of society.

For the Least of These Brothers and Sisters of Mine: Providing Mental Health Care to Undocumented Immigrant Children

2016

This article first examines the recent “surge” of unaccompanied children migrating to the United States, exploring its causes, children’s experiences on the journey, and what happens once they arrive in the United States. Because many aspects of these experiences are traumatic, they create a need for mental health care. The article then addresses this need and the fiscal and human costs of failing to address it before advocating a simple solution: expanding eligibility for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program to include low-income undocumented youth. After briefly examining the history and structure of these programs, the remainder of the article presents constitutional and policy arguments for removing the ban on providing these government services to children who are in the country without authorization.