Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis (original) (raw)

Objectives Previous meta-analyses on CT-colonography included both average and high risk individuals, which may overestimate the diagnostic value in screening. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain the value of CTcolonography for screening. Methods A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. Article selection and critical appraisal was done by two reviewers. Inclusion criteria: prospective, randomized trials or cohort studies comparing CTcolonography with colonoscopy (≥50 participants), ≥95% average risk participants ≥50 years. Study characteristics and 2×2 contingency Tables were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated per patient and per polyp (≥6 mm, ≥10 mm), using univariate and bivariate analyses. Results Five of 1,021 studies identified were included, including 4,086 participants (<1% high risk). I 2-values showed substantial heterogeneity, especially for 6-9 mm polyps and adenomas: 68.1% vs. 78.6% (sensitivity per patient). Estimated sensitivities for patients with polyps or adenomas ≥6 mm were 75.9% and 82.9%, corresponding specificities 94.6% and 91.4%. Estimated sensitivities for patients with polyps or adenomas ≥10 mm were 83.3% and 87.9%, corresponding specificities 98.7% and 97.6%. Estimated sensitivities per polyp for advanced adenomas ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm were 83.9% and 83.8%. Conclusion Compared to colonoscopy, CT-colonography has a high sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm. For (advanced) adenomas ≥6 mm sensitivity is somewhat lower.