Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Two cases and review of the technique (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Modified Technique for Laparoscopic Spleen Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy
Case reports in surgery, 2018
Spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is considered as first choice operation for symptomatic benign or small malignant lesions located at the body or tail of the pancreas. The two main surgical techniques that have been proposed and widely adopted for spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are the Warshaw and Kimura techniques. A novel modified approach for laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy is presented. The technique was initially performed in a 57-year-old female patient with mucinous cystadenoma. Following the surgical planes created by the fascia fusion and the organ rotation during embryogenesis (fascia of Toldt and renal fascia) with the patient in a right lateral decibutus position, the tumor was accessed retroperitoneally, without dividing the gastrocolic ligament and entering the lesser sac. The tail of the pancreas was mobilized anteriorly and medially, the lesion was visually identified and resected, and short gastric and l...
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2004
The precise role of laparoscopy in the resection of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CyNP) remains unknown. In addition, the question of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is controversial. This report evaluates the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LapSPDP) in 19 patients (17 women and 2 men) with CyNP. A prospective comparison was made between 11 consecutive patients (group I) with splenic vessel preservation (SVP) and 8 patients (group II) without SVP (Warshaw technique). This study used color-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) as a tool to identify patients at high risk for postoperative splenic complications. The mean tumor size was, in both groups, 5 cm. In group I, with an intent-to-treat basis of SVP, only in 54.5 % of patients the spleen was preserved with an intact splenic artery and vein; in the remainder, conversion to the Warshaw technique was required for intraoperative bleeding. Evaluation of intraoperative factors showed that the mean operative time was significantly shorter (165 vs. 222 minutes) and the mean blood loss significantly lower (225 vs. 495 mL) in the group of LapSPDP with the Warshaw technique. No patients required blood transfusion in both groups. The overall conversion rate was 0%. The overall rate of pancreatic fistula was 15% and it was classified as biochemical leak (no clinical symptomatology). Overall splenic complications were observed in 16.6 % of patients but occurred only in three patients undergoing LapSPDP with the Warshaw technique; CDUS showed in 2 patients a focal splenic infarct; the third patient had an initial hospital stay of 5 days, was readmitted 2 days later for a massive splenic necrosis, and splenectomy was performed. The overall hospital stay was 5.7 days. At mean follow up of 22 months (range 6–42), there have been no local recurrences.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Distal pancreatectomy is the standard curative treatment for symptomatic benign, premalignant, and malignant disease of the pancreatic body and tail. The most obvious benefits of a laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy include earlier recovery and shorter hospital stay. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy should be attempted in case of benign disease. Spleen preservation can be achieved preferably by preserving the splenic vessels (Kimura technique), but also by resecting the splenic vessels and maintaining vascularity through the short gastric vessels and left gastroepiploic artery (Warshaw technique). Several studies have suggested a higher rate of spleen preservation with laparoscopy. The radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy has become mainstay for treating pancreatic cancer and can be performed laparoscopically as well. Evidence on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer is scarce. Despite the obvious advantages of lapar...
Single-Port Laparoscopic Spleen Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy
Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2012
Single-port laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly popular, with widened indication to more types of surgery. This report will present our initial experience with spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy technique through a small transumbilical incision using the single-port approach for a cystic tumor of pancreatic body. The surgery was done using specialized single-port instruments and normal laparoscopic instruments. The total operative time for this surgery is 233 minutes, and it was completed without drains. Patient was discharged from the hospital on the third day postoperatively in good condition.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences, 2013
Distal pancreatectomy has been a standard technique for pancreatic body and tail lesions for years ago. Recently, it is being performed laparoscopically in a perfect manner. There are two common methods for this procedure. One is distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and the other is distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation. In patients with splenic vessels involvement, it is not recommended to save the spleen, because of existing chance of splenic ischemia. On the other hand, after splenectomy there is great chance of immune system problems and fatal infections. This report, presents a patient who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy due to cystic tumor of pancreatic body with splenic vessels involvement and ligation of them was necessary and the spleen was saved successfully with no following complications.
Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2005
Distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation may be the preferred procedure for certain benign tumors and cystic lesions of the pancreatic body or tail. Alternatively, laparoscopic removal including either distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy or splenic-preservation with ligation of the ...
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Objective. To compare outcomes between laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) and open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (OSPDP) for treatment of benign and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreas and evaluate feasibility and safety of LSPDP. Methods. The clinical data of 53 cases of LSPDP and 44 cases of OSPDP performed between January 2008 and August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups. However, the LSPDP group had statistically significant shorter operative time (145.3±55.9 versus 184.7±33.5, P=0.03) and lesser intraoperative blood loss (150.6±180.8 versus 253.5±76.2, P=0.03) than that of the OSPDP group. Moreover, the LSPDP group also had statistically significant earlier passing of first flatus (2.2±1.4 versus 3.1±1.9, P=0.01), earlier diet intake (2.3±1.8 versus 3.4±2.0, P=0.01), and shorter hospital...
Comparison of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with or without Splenic Preservation
Indian Journal of Surgery, 2013
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has gained large popularity in recent years, although the choice of whether to preserve the spleen has remained inconsistent. The aim of our study was to report our experiences with LDP and to provide evidence for the safety of the operative technique and an evaluation index of splenic function. We retrospectively evaluated all LDPs performed at our institution between March 2008 and February 2012. Cases were divided into a laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) group (n = 14) and an LDP with splenectomy (LDPS) group (n =19). Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses were used to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Demographic characteristics, operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, pathologic diagnosis, and complication rate were similar between groups. Patients who underwent LDPS tended to have larger masses and lower pancreatic fistula rates, but these differences were not significant. White blood cell (WBC) counts were significantly higher in the LDPS group than in the LSPDP group on postoperative days 1 and 7. To avoid splenectomy-associated complications, preservation of the spleen and especially the splenic vessels are preferred. This procedure can be performed safely and feasibly. Lower postoperative WBC counts may imply better splenic function.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Objective. To summarize the operation experience of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with preservation of splenic vessels by an inferior-posterior dissection of the pancreatic body and evaluate its feasibility. Methods. Patients undergoing LSPDS at Ningbo Li Huili Hospital and Ningbo Li Huili Eastern Hospital from January 2014 to April 2017 were recruited in this study and were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the inferior-posterior approach group and the other approach group. We sought to compare outcomes of the two groups. Results. The LSPDP procedure was completed successfully in 49 cases, and 48 patients had their splenic artery and vein preserved, including 26 cases in the inferior-posterior approach group and 22 cases in the other approach group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age (p=0.18), sex (p=0.56), preoperative diabetes (p=1.00), ASA gradin...
Clinical comparison of distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy
Journal of Korean medical science, 2008
The spleen may be preserved during distal pancreatectomy (DP) for benign disease. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative and postoperative courses of patients with conventional DP and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) for benign lesions or tumors with low-grade malignant potential occurred at the body or tail of the pancreas. A retrospective analysis was performed for the hospital records of all the patients undergoing DP and SPDP between January 1995 and April 2006. One-hundred forty-three patients underwent DP and 37 patients underwent SPDP. There were no significant differences in age, sex, indications of operation, estimated blood loss, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 21 (13.3%) patients following DP and in 3 (8.1%) following SPDP without a significant difference (p=0.081). Portal vein thrombosis occurred in 4 patients after DP. Splenic infarction occurred in one patient after SPD...