The mathematical structure of Newtonian spacetime: Classical dynamics and gravitation (original) (raw)
Related papers
The relativistic generalization of the gravitational force for arbitrary space-times
1992
It has been suggested that re-expressing relativity in terms of forces could provide fresh insights. The formalism developed for this purpose only applied to static, or conformally static, space-times. Here we extend it to arbitrary space-times. It is hoped that this formalism may lead to a workable definition of mass and energy in relativity.
On a Generalized Theory of Relativity
2010
The General Theory of Relativity (GTR) is essentially a theory of gravitation. It is built on the Principle of Relativity. It is bonafide knowledge, known even to Einstein the founder, that the GTR violates the very principle upon which it is founded i.e., it violates the Principle of Relativity; because a central equation i.e., the geodesic law which emerges from the GTR, is well known to be in conflict with the Principle of Relativity because the geodesic law, must in complete violation of the Principle of Relativity, be formulated in special (or privileged) coordinate systems i.e., Gaussian coordinate systems. The Principle of Relativity clearly and strictly forbids the existence/use of special (or privileged) coordinate systems in the same way the Special Theory of Relativity forbids the existence of privileged and or special reference systems. In the pursuit of a more Generalized Theory of Relativity i.e., an all-encampusing unified field theory to include the Electromagnetic, Weak & the Strong force, Einstein and many other researchers, have successfully failed to resolve this problem. In this reading, we propose a solution to this dilemma faced by Einstein and many other researchers i.e., the dilemma of obtaining a more Generalized Theory of Relativity. Our solution brings together the Gravitational, Electromagnetic, Weak & the Strong force under a single roof via an extension of Riemann geometry to a new hybrid geometry that we have coined the Riemann-Hilbert Space (RHS). This geometry is a fusion of Riemann geometry and the Hilbert space. Unlike Riemann geometry, the RHS preserves both the length and the angle of a vector under parallel transport because the affine connection of this new geometry, is a tensor. This tensorial affine leads us to a geodesic law that truly upholds the Principle of Relativity. It is seen that the unified field equations derived herein are seen to reduce to the well known Maxwell-Procca equation, the non-Abelian nuclear force field equations, the Lorentz equation of motion for charged particles and the Dirac equation.
I discuss several issues related to "classical" spacetime structure. I review Galilean, Newtonian, and Leibnizian spacetimes, and briefly describe more recent developments. The target audience is undergraduates and early graduate students in philosophy; the presentation avoids mathematical formalism as much as possible.
Theories of gravitation in the space of reference frames
Il Nuovo Cimento B, 1979
Following the formalism developed in a preceding paper, we describe the gravitational field by means of ten vector fields defined on the ten-dimensional manifold 5P of the local inertial reference frames. These fields correspond to ten operationally defined infinitesimal transformations. The gravitational field is coupled with a set of scalar fields on 5~ which describe particles with arbitrary spin. We discuss three different choices of the action from which the gravitational-field equations are derived. We obtain in this way two different theories which are equivalent to the Einstein-Cartan metric-torsion theory and a theory which is equivalent to a scalar-metric-torsion theory of the kind studied by Aldersley. In the absence of spin angular momentum, the last theory can be reduced to the scalar-metric theory developed by Brans and Dieke. We obtain in this way a geometric interpretation of the scalar field introduced by Dirae, Jordan, Brans and Dicke.
Demystification of the spacetime model of relativity
Physics Essays 24, 85 (2011), 2011
The geometrical interpretation of gravitation in general theory of relativity imparts certain mystical properties to the spacetime continuum. The mystic connotations associated with this space-time model may be attributed to the fallacious depiction of space-time as a physical entity. This paper proves that the spacetime continuum in GR is a simple mathematical model and not a physical entity.
Some Aspects of Minimally Relativistic Newtonian Gravity
Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 1991
This paper aims to examine if the classical tests of General Relativity (GR) can be predicted by a simpler approach based on minimal changes in the Newtonian gravity. The approach yields a precession of the perihelion of Mercury by an amount 39.4"/century which is very close to the observed Dicke-Goldenberg value (39.6"/century), but less than the popularly accepted value (43"/ century). The other tests exactly coincide with those of GR. Our analysis also displays the genesis as well as the role of geometry in the description of gravitational processes. The time dependent spherically symmetric equations, which are mathematically interesting, call for a further study. The model also allows unambiguous formulation of conservation laws. On the whole, the paper illustrates the limited extent to which a second rank tensor analogy (nonlinear) with flat background Faraday-Maxwell electrodynamics can be pushed in describing gravitation