Performing Economics: A Critique of 'Teaching and Learning (original) (raw)
Related papers
Teaching Economics at the University Level: Dynamics of Parameters and Implications
2005
This paper investigates various changing aspects in the teaching of economics within the context of the dynamics of parameters. These include inter alia the role of effective communication, clarity of lecture notes, ability to focus on the centrality of theme, teaching and learning environment, and ability to illustrate with examples. It also notes the changing perception of indicators of good teaching over the two points in time in which data were collected.
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education
This paper outlines an innovative redesign of a course on the History of Economic Thought, which acted as a vehicle for exposing students to different theoretical traditions and engaging them in critical reflections on neoclassical economics. It also presents findings from a research project conducted with economics students at the University of Northampton, UK, that aimed to understand their experiences of the redesign. We reflect on the pedagogical challenges highlighted by students and its implications for (re)designing the economics curriculum. Our findings challenge arguments commonly deployed against the introduction of pluralist teaching, including that there is no appetite for this in the broader student population; that students would fail to engage with such an approach; that they fear a negative impact on employability, and that alternative economic approaches should only be introduced at an advanced level. 1
The economists of tomorrow: the case for assertive pluralism in economics education
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2010
This paper is a proposal to change the way economists are educated. This should be achieved by rewriting the undergraduate curriculum for economics on the basis of the principle of ‘assertive pluralism’ explained in this paper. It is a fuller version of the paper of the same name that was published in the International Review of Economics Education and which is also on this Academia site This will equip the public to recognise bad economics, which I define as economics that takes no precautions against the possibility of error. It offers a remedy for what Colander et al (2009) describe as the ‘systemic failure’ of economics, widely perceived as leading to its mistakes preceding the crash of 2008. And it offers the profession a defence against the cause of this failure, which, following Turner (2009), I describe as its regulatory capture by financial interests. The objectives are intimately linked: by offering the public a definition of good economics, a pluralist curriculum offers the opportunity to demand good economists. If these same criteria are embedded in the requirements placed on economics education providers, this will create a supply of good economists. Both will conspire to produce a generation of economists who can react, and prepare for, those changes now taking place in the world, which their predecessors were so poorly able to foresee, and to which they were so poorly equipped to react.
International Review of Economics Education, 2009
The purpose of the paper is to develop the argument that history of thought and methodology should form part of the content of pluralist teaching in economics, where the aim of this teaching is to equip students to exercise their own judgement as economists. Discussion of the nature and scope of economics, with examples from history, helps students understand what is involved in considering a range of approaches and methods (rather than uncritically accepting one general approach, but without resorting to 'anything goes'). A way of teaching about the current crisis is used as an exemplar.
A New Revolution in Economics Education
New trends are emerging in education of economics following rapid de- velopment in economic theories for static, dynamic and strategic analysis, increasing applications of general equilibrium modelling for evaluation of economic policies at national, regional and global level and overwhelm- ing advancement in econometric techniques developed to test those the- ories. A concise knowledge of these theories and techniques is essential for understanding micro and macro economic processes and to in‡uence policy making for achieving greater e¢ ciency and satisfaction of mankind. How careful design of curriculum and thoughtful implementations could be instrumental in achieving higher standard of teaching and research is analysed using the practical experience over the years in the University of Hull.
Economics: The Introductory Lesson to be Taught and Learned
This paper below tries rather a courageous approach to the topic of economics, as updated, than an academic formulation. Actually, there are two Parts, for two different approaches through which this “old’ and uncomfortable topic for all students and learners reveals as a really dramatic character: a “champion permanently (re)playing its own title”, the one who could lose all he has and get off the scene one day
The Scholarship of Teaching Economics
The Journal of Economic Education, 2001
The authors provide an overview of papers presented at The Scholarship of Teaching Economics conference that was held at The University of Melbourne in July 2000. The objective of the conference was to bring attention to research being conducted in economic education at the tertiary level and to engage academic economists in discussion about the scholarship of teaching economics. The presentations of seven of the keynote speakers are discussed using the framework of who, what, and how of teaching economics. Who should determine the curriculum? What should be taught? And how should it be taught?
Teaching Economics: A Portfolio of Reflections and Strategies
lambert publishing, 2015
This book illustrates how to use self reflections to improve teaching of economics. It differentiates between two kinds of self reflections. One kind is long tern reflections upon one’s life long experience of learning, research and teaching. These reflections help to shape one’s long term career path and long term strategy in teaching. The other kind is short term reflections upon one’s current teaching. These help to improve one’s current teaching in and out of the classroom immediately. The book presents the author's long term reflections upon his over three decades of learning, research and teaching in Singapore, Canada, America, Taiwan and Malaysia. The book also presents the author's short term reflections upon his three years teaching experience at the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus from 2011 to 2014. Among the short term strategies proposed are interactions between instructor and students, integration of multimedia technology into teaching, write to learn a...