Immunoparalysis in Septic Shock Patients (original) (raw)

Septic shock: Pathogenesis and treatment

Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 1993

Septic shock is the host’s inflammatory response to infection. There are multiple endogenous mediators responsible for the pathogenesis of septic shock. Cytokines, nitric oxide and prostaglandins are some of the major mediators. The term sepsis syndrome allows for an earlier diagnosis and treatment. Management of septic shock is focused in maintaining hemodynamic stability and an adequate oxygen delivery and utilization. Careful attention to each organ-system is of paramount importance to prevent complications and improve outcome. Experimental therapies to modulate the inflammatory response are promising.

Early Assessment of Leukocyte Alterations at Diagnosis of Septic Shock

Shock, 2010

A dramatic decrease in circulating lymphocyte number is regularly described after septic shock. However, it is unknown how early this alteration develops after diagnosis of shock and if it remains stable over time. Twenty-one septic shock patients with no comorbidities were included within 2 h after the beginning of vasopressive treatment. Flow cytometry phenotyping of circulating leukocyte subpopulations and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of T-bet, GATA-3, FOXP3, and ROR+ mRNA were performed in patients from the diagnosis of shock and every 6 h during the subsequent 48 h. From their admission in the intensive care unit, patients present with major alterations of circulating leukocyte count (leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and major lymphopenia). The numbers of every lymphocyte subpopulations (T, B, and natural killer cells) were diminished. Gene expression analysis of transcription factors specific for T H 1, T H 2, CD4 + CD25 + regulatory, and T H 17 lymphocytes showed a severe decrease in comparison with healthy individuals' values. These alterations remain stable during the first 48 h after inclusion in the protocol despite early and aggressive resuscitation and antibiotherapy administered in patients. At the time of diagnosis of shock and admission in the intensive care unit, septic patients already present with severe lymphopenia involving every lymphocyte subsets including CD4 + T-cell subpopulations. No significant variation could be detected within the first 48 h. This should be taken into account in the forthcoming clinical trials testing immunomodulating therapies in septic shock patients.

Pathophysiologic mechanisms in septic shock

Laboratory Investigation a Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology, 2014

The systemic inflammatory response that occurs in the septic patient as a result of an infectious insult affects multiple organs and systems, causing numerous physiological derangements. Alterations in phagocytic, lymphocytic and endothelial cell function and immune regulation are evident, leading to heterogeneity in a host's response to a septic challenge. In addition, the normal hemostatic balance shifts toward a procoagulant state through alterations in tissue factor, antithrombin, protein C and the inhibition of fibinolysis, which can result in thrombus formation and paradoxical hemostatic failure. In an effort to diagnose sepsis and predict outcomes, biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, pro-calcitonin, pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines have been investigated with varying results. Targeted therapies for sepsis, most notably Xigris (recombinant human activated protein C), have proven unsuccessful and treatment continues to remain reliant on source control, antibiotics and supportive interventions, specifically early goal-directed therapy. This brief review gives an overview of the immunopathologic and coagulopathic alterations that occur in sepsis, soluble inflammatory mediators as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and the clinical management of the septic patient.

Time Course of Septic Shock in Immunocompromised and Nonimmunocompromised Patients

Critical Care Medicine, 2017

To address the impact of underlying immune conditions on the course of septic shock with respect to both mortality and the development of acute infectious and noninfectious complications. Design: An 8-year (2008-2015) monocenter retrospective study. Setting: A medical ICU in a tertiary care center. Patients: Patients diagnosed for septic shock within the first 48 hours of ICU admission were included. Patients were classified in four subgroups with respect to their immune status: nonimmunocompromised and immunocompromised distributed into hematologic or solid malignancies and nonmalignant immunosuppression. Outcomes were in-hospital death and the development of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications and ICU-acquired infections. The determinants of death and complications were addressed by multivariate competing risk analysis. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Eight hundred one patients were included. Among them, 305 (38%) were immunocompromised, distributed into solid tumors (122), hematologic malignancies (106), and nonmalignant immunosuppression (77). The overall 3-day, in-ICU, and in-hospital mortality rates were 14.1%, 37.3%, and 41.3%, respectively. Patients with solid tumors displayed increased in-hospital mortality (cause-specific hazard, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.64-2.96]; p < 0.001). ICU-acquired infections occurred in 211 of the 3-day survivors (33%). In addition, 95 (11.8%) and 70 (8.7%) patients exhibited severe ischemic or hemorrhagic complications during the ICU stay. There was no association between the immune status and the occurrence of ICU-acquired infections. Nonmalignant immunosuppression and hematologic malignancies were independently associated with increased risks of severe ischemic events (causespecific hazard, 2.12 [1.14-3.96]; p = 0.02) and hemorrhage (cause-specific hazard, 3.17 [1.41-7.13]; p = 0.005), respectively. Conclusions: The underlying immune status impacts on the course of septic shock and on the susceptibility to ICU-acquired complications. This emphasizes the complexity of sepsis syndromes in relation with comorbid conditions and raises the question of the relevant endpoints in clinical studies.

Prognostic values of serum cytokines in septic shock

Intensive Care Medicine, 1994

cantly associated with a favourable outcome. IL6 is certainly involved in the pathophysiology of septic shock but further studies are required to determine whether or not it is directly involved in the mediation of late and lethal complications of septic shock. Serum lactate levels and oxygen-derived variables were of less interest as prognostic factors.

Protracted immune disorders at one year after ICU discharge in patients with septic shock

Critical Care

Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and critical illness worldwide and is associated with an increased mortality rate in the months following hospital discharge. The occurrence of persistent or new organ dysfunction(s) after septic shock raises questions about the mechanisms involved in the post-sepsis status. The present study aimed to explore the immune profiles of patients one year after being discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) following treatment for abdominal septic shock. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study in the surgical ICU of a university hospital. Eighty-six consecutive patients admitted for septic shock of abdominal origin were included in this study. Fifteen different plasma biomarkers were measured at ICU admission, at ICU discharge and at one year after ICU discharge. Three different clusters of biomarkers were distinguished according to their functions, namely: (1) inflammatory response, (2) cell damage and apoptosis, (3) immunosuppression and resolution of inflammation. The primary objective was to characterize variations in the immune status of septic shock patients admitted to ICU up to one year after ICU discharge. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between these biomarker variations and patient outcomes. Results: At the onset of septic shock, we observed a cohesive pro-inflammatory profile and low levels of inflammation resolution markers. At ICU discharge, the immune status demonstrated decreased but persistent inflammation and increased immunosuppression, with elevated programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) levels, and a counterbalanced resolution process, with elevated levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10), resolvin D5 (RvD5), and IL-7. One year after hospital discharge, homeostasis was not completely restored with several markers of inflammation remaining elevated. Remarkably, IL-7 was persistently elevated, with levels comparable to those observed after ICU discharge, and PD-1, while lower, remained in the elevated abnormal range. Conclusions: In this study, protracted immune disturbances were observed one year after ICU discharge. The study results suggested the presence of long-lasting immune illness disorders following a long-term septic insult, indicating the need for long-term patient follow up after ICU discharge and questioning the use of immune intervention to restore immune homeostasis after abdominal septic shock.

Critical advances in septicemia and septic shock

Critical care (London, England), 2000

Recent advances suggest that toll-like receptors, various cytokines, cicosanoids, free radicals and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) play an important role in the pathobiology of septicemia and septic shock. Anti-MIF antibodies can decrease the plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), lower bacterial circulating counts and enhance survival of animals with septicemia and septic shock. Monocyte expression of MHC-class II antigens, neutrophil expression of the integrin CD11b/CD18 and neutrophil activation can be related to the development of, and/or recovery from, post-operative sepsis. Thus, biological variations in the response of an individual to a given stimulus, appears to determine his/her ability or inability to develop and also recover from sepsis and septic shock. This suggests that it may be possible to predict the development of septicemia and septic shock in a given individual and take appropriate action both to prevent and treat them adequately.