Application of the Feynman-Kac path integral method in finding the ground state of quantum systems (original) (raw)

Uploaded (2013) | Journal: Computer Physics Communications

Abstract

Group theory considerations and properties of a continuous path are used to define a failure tree procedure for finding eigenvalues of the Schrödinger equation using stochastic methods. The procedure is used to calculate the lowest excited state eigenvalues of eigenfunctions possessing anti-symmetric nodal regions in configuration space using the Feynman-Kac path integral method. Within this method the solution of the imaginary time Schrödinger equation is approximated by random walk simulations on a discrete grid constrained only by symmetry considerations of the Hamiltonian. The required symmetry constraints on random walk simulations are associated with a given irreducible representation and are found by identifying the eigenvalues for the irreducible representation corresponding to symmetric or antisymmetric eigenfunctions for each group operator. The method provides exact eigenvalues of excited states in the limit of infinitesimal step size and infinite time. The numerical method is applied to compute the eigenvalues of the lowest excited states of the hydrogenic atom that transform as Γ 2 and Γ 4 irreducible representations. Numerical results are compared with exact analytical results. 

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (19)

  1. M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. II, Academic Press, New York, 1975, pp. 279-281.
  2. M.D. Donsker, M. Kac, J. Res. National Bureau Stand. 44 (1950) 581.
  3. A. Korzeniowski, Statist. Probab. Lett. 8 (1989) 229.
  4. A. Korzeniowski, J.L. Fry, D. Orr, N.G. Fazleev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 893.
  5. J.M. Rejcek, S. Datta, N.G. Fazleev, J.L. Fry, A. Korzeniowski, Comput. Phys. Comm. 105 (1997) 108.
  6. B. Simon, Functional Integration and Quantum Physics, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
  7. J.B. Anderson, in: K. Lipkowitz, D. Boyd (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 13, Wiley-VCH, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1999, pp. 133-182, Chapter 3.
  8. M. Caffarel, P. Claverie, C. Mijoule, J. Andzelm, D. Salahub, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 990.
  9. W. Lester, B. Hammond, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41 (1990) 283.
  10. D. Ray, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1954) 299.
  11. D.M. Ceperley, B. Alder, Science 231 (1986) 555.
  12. D.M. Ceperley, J. Stat. Phys. 63 (1991) 1237.
  13. E. Lieb, D. Mattis, Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 164.
  14. D.J. Klein, H.M. Picket, J. Chem. Phys. 64 (1976) 4811.
  15. E.B. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 63 (1975) 4870.
  16. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics Non-Relativistic Theory, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, 1977, p. 59.
  17. M.A. Lavrent'ev, L.A. Lyusternik, The Calculus of Variations, 2nd edn., Nauka, Moscow, 1950, Chapter IX.
  18. E.P. Wigner, Group Theory and its Application to Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectrum, Academic Press, New York, 1959, p. 118.
  19. J.P. Elliott, P.G. Dawder, Symmetry in Physics, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, New York, 1979, p. 43.