BEYOND THE FRONT-LINE: THE COPING STRATEGIES AND DISCRETION OF LITHUANIAN STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY DURING COVID-19 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Revista de Administração Pública
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the strategic role of social care policy to minimize the effects of this health crisis and its consequences on the poorest and most vulnerable population. This article analyzes the perception of street-level bureaucrats in the Brazilian social care network on how the pandemic has affected their performance and professional routine. The research was based on a survey, consultations with representatives of municipal social care services, and analysis of government regulations. The results show that social workers feel unprotected and unable to provide adequate responses to the pandemic’s increasing and urgent demands, revealing a lack of institutional support to act appropriately. The professionals also reported substantial changes in their working dynamics, particularly in their relationship with the attended population, one of the main pillars of the Brazilian social care network. These elements directly affect the provision of social care services ...
Street-Level Bureaucrats at the Forefront of Pandemic Response: A Comparative Perspective
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Crises' implications for street-level implementation are understudied despite streetlevel bureaucracy, as the operational arm of the state, by definition, serving on the frontline of crisis treatment. Drawing on multiple public services provided by varied street-level bureaucrats' professions in different countries, this special issue demonstrates key implications for street-level implementation during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, both as perceived by the public and by decision-makers and as practiced. Applying a comparative perspective rarely taken in street-level research exemplifies understudied variance across countries, professions, and time. Fast policymaking cycles inherent to crisis highlight overlooked upward influence of street-level bureaucrats in policymaking.
Public Administration in the era of Covid-19: Policy Responses and Reforms underway
ELIAMEP Policy Paper #74/2021, 2021
• Covid-19 has caused an unprecedented shock to the state apparatus and has triggered major reforms in the administrative system of Greece. Policy responses to the pandemic have brought about several positive changes towards the modernization and de-bureaucratization of public administration. However, the pace and scale of change vary significantly. • The pandemic has acted as a strong driver for the digital transformation of the public sector and the strengthening of e-government policies. • Numerous administrative procedures were streamlined, digitalized and simplified, working conditions have become more flexible and several improvements have taken place in service delivery and state-citizen relations. • The observed centralisation of decision-making and the often use of fast-track procedures have raised questions of democratic control, transparency and the rule of law, while the emergency measures have been criticized for the threats they pose for the protection of citizens’ rights, individual liberties and personal data. • A key challenge remains the integration the emergency measures of the Covid-19 policy agenda into a longer-term programme of administrative reform in the post-Covid era.
Politics and Governance
The Covid-19 pandemic provoked critical changes to welfare in Europe, requiring the dematerialisation of programmes and services while relying mainly on remote support. This study aims to present insights into how European public employment services have coped and adapted to the pandemic challenges, particularly regarding the digitalisation and delivery of services to young people in rural areas. It focuses on three case studies from distinct European regions: Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania. It is based on an exploratory survey of public employment services national offices and qualitative data collected from public employment services offices in rural settings. It highlights the advantages and dangers of the adoption of digitalisation processes, namely considering literacy and accessibility in diverse contexts. It concludes that despite cultural and regional differences, all three countries evidenced an acceleration in service provision due to digitalisation and were capable of ...
Polish Political Science, 2022
The primary burden of tackling the pandemic COVID-19 lies with the state as the entity responsible for protecting the health and life of its citizens. Hence, it can be argued that the focus of the pandemic-induced changes to the Polish legal order was on administrative law, which not only sets out the principles of the functioning of the State as the executive power but also governs the relations between the government, local government and citizens, which had to be significantly modified during the pandemic. It would be impossible to analyse and discuss all the emergency measures that appeared in Poland's administrative law due to the threats posed by the pandemic. The subject matter of the present study is the analysis of the legal solutions adopted in the Republic of Poland in the sphere of public law in connection with the spread of the virus and particular provisions shaping relationships between the two basic structural branches of Polish public administration, viz. the government administration and the local-government administration. The following part of this study will accordingly be devoted to the analysis of the legislative solution contained in Article 11h of the COVID-19 Act, establishing a legal framework for issuing binding instructions to, among others, the various bodies of local governments, local-government legal persons and local-government organisational entities without legal personality.
Analysis of Public Services to Bureaucracy Changes in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era
Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik
The purpose of study is to analyze public services for employees in Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The research method used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This research was conducted at the Directorate of Cooperation, Development, and Internationalization at a University in Solo. Data collection was carried out by observation and documentation. The results shows public services in 2020 with 81 MoUs and 226 MoAs, increasing significantly compared with those 2019 with 79 MoUs, 208 MoAs, and those up to May 2021 with 30 MoUs and 106 MoAs. The number of recommendation/approval processes for the foreign official travel documents for Lecturers & Educators and Students decreases significantly for three consecutive years from 2019 to 2020. The changes in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era are aspects affecting the changes in institutions and work systems. Optimizing the cooperation service system, the Directorate of Cooperation, Development, and Internationalization has created an inte...
Social assistance institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of Polish social workers
International Social Work, 2020
This article aims to present the results of a quantitative study (which used the Computer-Assisted Web Interview [CAWI] technique) conducted among social workers from social assistance institutions in the Wielkopolska region-the second-largest first-level administrative unit in Poland in terms of area. The aim of the research was to diagnose and describe the main changes in the functioning of institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Keywords Local communities, social assistance institutions, social consequences of COVID-19, social welfare system in Poland, social workers in Poland The following essay combines two types of reflection on the pandemic consequences on the social welfare system-scientific and practical. The first is done from the perspective of an active scholar, the latter of a person working in local government institutions supporting social workers and implementing social assistance resolutions. Results shown hereafter were obtained using the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique among social workers employed in social welfare institutions-both field workers and the institutions' management staff-in the Greater Poland voivodeship. There are 226 social welfare centers in the voivodeship, all of which employ social workers, and 31 district (Polish: powiat) family support centers out of which 27 are contracting social workers included in this study. The questionnaire was emailed to all institutions. The research covered responses from 176 social workers and 108 managers/directors. The total sample size was 284 persons. As for the institution types, the research included rural (34.7%), urban-rural (39.9%), and urban (18.8%) establishments.
IN BETWEEN: DEFENSIVE REACTIVITY OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS IN POLAND TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 2022
This paper discusses a research project that attempted to examine selected public institutions' response strategies to a pandemic. The most important research question of the project was the relationship between the pandemic and innovativeness of the sector of public institutions (understood as the desire to introduce new ways of operating, new inter-institutional links, new patterns of relations with stakeholders, etc. resulting from the knowledge provided to individual institutions by functioning in conditions of the pandemic). During qualitative research we found that the researched institutions' predominant reaction to the challenges of the pandemic was not an orientation towards innovation but a striving to maintain a mode of functioning that is as similar as possible to that from before the pandemic. The innovations made (transition to remote working, simplification of some administrative procedures) resulted from external pressure to a greater extent and internal reflexivity to a lesser extent. The narratives captured in the study about the everyday life of public institutions during the pandemic have three common elements. First, they all focus less on large and spectacular innovations and more on micro-innovations (not treated as innovation, but understood as dozens of micro-improvements, minimal adjustments to existing routines). Second, they all miniaturize the experience of the pandemic, regarding it as events so extreme as to be useless for designing a better institutional order. Thirdly, all the reconstructed narratives are situated in an institutional zone of in-between, which means that they perceive themselves as a transparent medium fluctuating between the state and society and as a subject without influence on the shape of its own functioning. On the one hand, this would depend on the level of civic culture and, on the other hand, on the policy created at the highest levels of the state.