The Theologian's Freedom: Ludovico Muratori The Theologian's Freedom: Ludovico Muratori and the Limits of Theological Speech and the Limits of Theological Speech (original) (raw)
Related papers
Freedom of Speech and Its Christian 'Prison': Thomas Aquinas, Johannes Reuchlin
CAS Working Papers Series: Advanced Academia Programme, 2019
This paper illustrates fragments of the pre-Miltonian history of ‘the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely’ in two of its key (even if not directly interrelated) thematic aspects: the protection of human dignity as a counterpoint to the absolutely unlimited freedom of speech – in the context of Thomas Aquinas’ (1224/5–1274) discussion of verbal injuries; and the inviolability of personal freedom of thought and expression – in the context of Johannes Reuchlin’s (1455–1522) defence of Jewish writings. On that basis, the paper finally attempts to outline the significance which the views of authors such as Aquinas and Reuchlin may have in a broader cultural and historical context.
Jesuit Philosophy on the Eve of Modernity, 2019
This chapter sketches the origins and development of the debate over the notion of a uniform and solid doctrine and its impact on Jesuit philosophy. More precisely, it outlines how Jesuits thought about and actually exercised censorship in philosophy, how much liberty of philosophizing they allowed for, and what institutional means they established to enforce solidity and uniformity in doctrine.
Governing the passions: Sketches on Lodovico Antonio Muratori's moral philosophy
History of European Ideas, 2006
Muratori has often been portrayed as a moral philosopher who represented the traditional neo-Aristotelian mainstream of Italian intellectual life in the early part of the eighteenth century. His loyalty to Christianity as a basis from which societies ought to be reformed has determined his reputation as a 'pre-enlightened' thinker. Yet, it is argued here that not only was Muratori very much in touch with the state of the art of early eighteenth-century moral philosophy, but also that he was really a historian with political interests who came to develop a renewed Christian moral philosophy as a tool to respond to the political challenges of the time. Fallen man's preference for self-preservation to natural freedom prepared him for engaging in increasingly sociable contexts that required further self-disciplining and moral improvement. Thus, man cultivated his fallen condition into prudence and ultimately developed a capacity both for charity and for functioning in modern commercial societies. r