On the optimal fare policies in urban transportation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Optimal economic interventions in scheduled public transport
Research in Transportation Economics, 2008
This chapter analyses appropriate regulatory instruments for public transport markets under monopoly and competition, respectively. For the monopoly case, the operator chooses too low supply, compared to welfare optimum. In contrast, for the competition case the operators choose too high supply, at least for the competition model that we have considered most appropriate. It is found that under monopoly a subsidy should be applied, while under competition taxation should be applied.
Optimal fares and capacity decisions for crowded public transport systems
2015
There is a large operations research literature on public transit system design. An extensive economic literature has also developed on public transit capacity investments, service frequency, and optimal pricing and subsidy policy. These two branches of literature have made significant advances in understanding public transit systems. However, in contrast to the literature on automobile traffic congestion, most of the studies have employed static models that cannot account for travelers' time-of-use decisions and the dynamics of transit congestion and crowding. The time profile of ridership is driven by the trade-off that users face between traveling at peak times and suffering crowding, and avoiding the peak by traveling earlier or later than they would like. A few studies have explored this trade-off using simple microeconomic models that combine trip-scheduling preferences as introduced by Vickrey (1969) with a crowding cost function that describes how utility from travel dec...
Research in Transportation Economics, 2019
This paper analyses the interaction between fares and public transport service quality. With higher fares the operator has more resources to provide a better service, while demand in turn depends on both service quality and fare leading therefore to the question as to whether there is an optimal fare for different city scales. The model builds on the work of Daganzo (2010) who determines optimal network headway, stop spacing as well as the ratio of a central dense service area compared to the whole city size. In contrast to Daganzo we include fare and demand elasticity. With this it is possible to obtain some general insights for a range of cities on what type of fare levels are favorable. We focus on a flat fare structure, finding that from the viewpoint of maximizing social welfare, lower fares are preferable. If the operator cost coverage ratio is considered as objective function then there exists an optimal fare above the minimum fare. We illustrate the possible existence of critical fare points, at which the demand and service quality of public transport suddenly drop if an attractive alternative mode exists. We discuss further the impact of city size and demand density on optimal fares and service quality.
Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport
Transport Reviews, 2003
After Vickrey's view, Mohring constructed a microeconomic model to determine the optimal frequency of buses serving a corridor with fixed demand. The main result was that frequency should be proportional to the square root of demand. The role of users' costs was shown to be crucial. This approach has evolved over the past decades, improving our understanding of public transport operations. This paper describes and analyses the evolution of microeconomic models for the analysis of public transport services with parametric demand, leading towards a more comprehensive one. An indepth review of all the contributions in the academic literature is presented, emphasizing both the treatment of variables and the form of the results mostly in terms of frequency and fleet size. A series of partial new elements is also identified. An extension of Jansson's model for a single period is developed analytically, including the effect of vehicle size on operating costs and the influence of crowding on the value of time. Numerical simulations are used for comparison and analysis. A general model is then proposed where bus operations are optimized accounting for a number of simultaneous relations. Finally, the different models are discussed and compared.
Optimal supply of public transport : subsidising production or consumption or both?
2014
This paper compares two approaches for providing public transport: competitive tendering and vouchers. The functioning of tendering is well known. The voucher alternative means that commercial operators charge passengers a fare and are also paid by the public sector principal for each. The paper establishes that it is also necessary to subsidize quality, here referring to the number of busses. Under full information, the two approaches would result in the same welfare maximizing outcome. Vouchers may be more expensive for taxpayers. The case for vouchers is shown to be stronger under an asymmetric information framework.
An Equilibrium Model in Urban Transit Riding and Fare Polices
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005
This paper deals with the riding behavior of commuters who take trains from a living place to a work place during morning rush hours. The total travel cost include early and late arrival penalties as well as carriage body capacity. An equivalent mathematical programming model which generates equilibrium riding behavior is presented. The number of actually chosen transit runs, passenger flow distributions, and fares resulted from three system configurations namely social optimum, monopoly by one company and duopoly competition, are investigated by numerical examples.
Studies in Economics, 2001
A theoretical model is adopted in order to examine optimal fare and optimal quality of supply schemes for a transport operator. The analysis shows how fares and quality of supply are related to travel distance and to the transport operator's weight on profit versus consumer surplus. Under reasonable assumptions imposed on the actual functions, it is found that the more weight the operator gives to profits, the higher the fare level and the higher the generalised travel costs. How the operator's objectives influence the quality of transport and how travelling distance affects fares, quality of transport and generalised travel costs are ambiguous, and depend on the initial restrictions placed on the actual functions. The paper then investigates how different additional restrictions imposed upon the functions influence the results. The paper also examines the special case in which the quality of transport is exogenous to the transport operator. One important result then is that...
Optimal sectional fare and frequency settings for transit networks with elastic demand
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2019
Sectional fares have been used in transit services in practice but are rarely examined analytically and compared with flat and distance-based fares, especially under the considerations of path choice, elastic demand, service frequency, and profitability. This paper proposes a bilevel programming model to jointly determine the fare and frequency setting to maximize transit operator's profit. The preceding three fare structures can be incorporated into the bilevel model. To consider the path choice and elastic demand in the bilevel model, the existing approach-based stochastic user equilibrium transit assignment model for the fixed demand was extended to the elastic demand case and the resultant model was used in the lower level model. To solve the bilevel model, the sensitivity-based descent search method that takes into account the approach-based formulation for the elastic demand transit assignment is proposed, in which the approach-based formulation was solved by the cost-averaging self-regulated averaging method. Numerical studies and mathematical analyses were performed to examine the model properties and compare the three fare structures. The result of the Tin Shui Wai network instance is also provided to illustrate the performance of the solution method. It is proven that when all passengers' destinations are located at transit terminals, the sectional fare structure is always better than the other two fare structures in terms of profitability. For more general networks, the sectional fare structure is always better than the flat fare structure, but the choice between sectional and distance-based fare structures depends on the geometry of the network (e.g., the route structure and the distance between stops), the demand distribution, and the maximum allowable fares. It is also proven that the optimal profit (total vehicle mileage) is strictly monotonically decreasing (monotonically decreasing) with respect to the unit operating cost. Moreover, it is proven that the lower level approach-based assignment problem with elastic demand has exactly one solution. However, the bi-level problem can have multiple optimal solutions. Interestingly, it is found that from the operator's profitability point of view, providing better information to the passengers may not be good.