Peer-Review Writing Workshops in College Courses: Students’ Perspectives about Online and Classroom Based Workshops (original) (raw)
Related papers
Students’ collaborative peer reviewing in an online writing environment
2017
Peer review is applied as a powerful tool to enhance student collaboration online writing. The purpose of this paper is to analyse learners’ mechanisms of peer reviewing in the nature of student interventions and interactions in written online peer reviewing and how categorization of student comments can be used as a means for analysing student peer reviewing. The study is an in-depth investigation of computer science students participating in a technical writing course, using Google Drive as their joint work space. While writing their group text, the students were participating in peer reviewing work. Results show combining analysis models provide a better understanding of the implication of commenting in both scrutinizing the progressive scale of assistance, as well as area, nature, and type of commenting, together with what themes evolve. Further, taking turns providing feedback is an enriching activity.
Online and face-to-face peer review in academic writing: Frequency and preferences
Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2021
With the current advancement of technology and its potential for better teaching and learning outcomes, this paper compares the use of peer review in face-to-face settings and online platforms. The study recruited 142 students and 20 instructors from an American public mid-southern university. Data were collected over two academic semesters and included three instruments: questionnaires, observations, and interviews. Findings indicated that the participants generally hold a positive stance towards peer evaluation. They found face-to-face peer assessment during writing class time to be the most common and effective mode for they preferred immediate feedback in person. Contrary to laudable prior research findings, the majority of participants considered online review ineffective. They found various forms of technology quite distracting. Analyzing the extent to which native English speakers, non-native speakers, and instructors find virtual and face-to-face types of review worthwhile makes the study a valuable factor for instructors who wish to incorporate peer editing into their teaching.
Online and face-to-face peer review in academic writing: Frequency and preferences, 2021
With the current advancement of technology and its potential for better teaching and learning outcomes, this paper compares the use of peer review in face-to-face settings and online platforms. The study recruited 142 students and 20 instructors from an American public mid-southern university. Data were collected over two academic semesters and included three instruments: questionnaires, observations, and interviews. Findings indicated that the participants generally hold a positive stance towards peer evaluation. They found face-to-face peer assessment during writing class time to be the most common and effective mode for they preferred immediate feedback in person. Contrary to laudable prior research findings, the majority of participants considered online review ineffective. They found various forms of technology quite distracting. Analyzing the extent to which native English speakers, non-native speakers, and instructors find virtual and face-to-face types of review worthwhile makes the study a valuable factor for instructors who wish to incorporate peer editing into their teaching.
Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Review of Writing
Computers and Composition
Peer response has been shown to be an effective strategy for improving writing. The social nature of collaboration as peers give and receive feedback can broaden perspectives about audience and what good writing is and also help motivate writers to revise their work. This study is not designed to show impact of peer review on writing products, as this has been well documented in the research literature. Rather, it is a qualitative study comparing the processes of face-to-face (f2f) and online peer response in terms of strengths, limitations, similarities and differences. Traditionally, writing groups conduct peer response in a f2f, synchronous environment, but questions about the feasibility of using an online environment as another space where peer response and review could take place are central to this research study and acted as both catalyst and structure for the inquiry. We examined the attitudes and experiences of adult students, who are K-12 teachers across disciplines, using both a f2f environment and an online environment, as well as their experiences in being peer reviewers of the writing of others in these two contexts. This study suggests that literacy instructors who have been reluctant to teach online may find an entrée into online teaching by starting with peer response groups, as this study indicates that most rules and processes are parallel for online and f2f groups. In both environments, teaching writers the rules for response and training them seem necessary. Those instructors who embrace a process approach, where f2f groups are a vital component, may find some advantages to having some response conducted online. Overall, the results of this study show that the power of using different environments for peer review exists not in duplicating and imitating traditional methods, but in recognizing and understanding that f2f and online environments function in different ways to support peer review of writing.
Computer-mediated Peer Feedback in Academic Writing Classes
This study investigated student attitudes towards peer feedback and teacher screencast feedback and analyzed the focus of peer review comments and their impact on student revisions on an asynchronous, e-learning platform at a technical university in Italy. The participants in the study were PhD students from a variety of engineering disciplines with a B2 to C1 level of English. All participants were enrolled on a 5-week course which aimed to develop writing skills for the production of academic research articles. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered over a 4-week period of the course. The data was analyzed to discover the focus and use of peer feedback comments as well as student opinions of the peer feedback process, in order to assess the suitability of this pedagogic tool for the teaching context. The results showed that overall, students shifted from non-revision oriented comments to revision oriented comments, that they increased the number of global comments over the period and that there was a significant increase in the validity of the comments. The incorporation of valid and invalid comments rose, indicating that students had difficulties distinguishing between valid and invalid comments. Despite the encouraging overall findings, individual peer feedback groups had very varied weekly behaviours. Although outside the scope of this research, the motivation for varying group behaviour deserves further consideration.
Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2007
Peer review has become commonplace in composition courses and is increasingly employed in the context of telecommunication technology. The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of anonymous and identifiable electronic peer (e-peer) review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical peer feedback. Participants were 92 undergraduate freshmen in four English composition classes enrolled in the fall semesters of 2003 and 2004. The same instructor taught all four classes, and in each semester, one class was assigned to the anonymous e-peer review group and the other to the identifiable e-peer review group. All other elements—course content, assignments, demands, and classroom instruction— were held constant. The results from both semesters showed that students participating in anonymous e-peer review performed better on the writing performance task and provided more critical feedback to their peers than did students participating in the identifiable ...
College Students' Experience in Online Asynchronous Peer Feedback in Writing
TESOL and Technology Studies, 2021
Writing is heavy, tedious, and difficult for college students. Likewise, writing instruction is equally arduous for teachers. The implementation of online and remote classes due to the COVID-19 pandemic becomes an opportunity for students to develop writing through their peers’ feedback. This study analyzes the college students’ experience and evaluation in online asynchronous peer feedback in writing. One hundred college students in free sections from a private university responded to an adopted, modified, and validated survey questionnaire and focus group discussions to evaluate and validate their experience in online asynchronous peer feedback in writing. The survey results underwent statistical analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20, to determine the weighted mean scores. Thus, the results revealed that the college students have a strong positive experience in online asynchronous peer-feedback in writing with the course facilitator of Engli...
Re-examining the effects and affects of electronic peer reviews in a first-year composition class
While many researchers have studied the application of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in peer review activities in L2 composition classes, few have directly compared the effect of asynchronous CMC (ACMC) versus written comments. This paper describes a small-scale project carried out in an ESL composition class to reexamine the effects and affects of asynchronous CMC in L2 students’ peer review processes. Nine students’ responses on four drafts were analyzed. Two drafts were peer-reviewed using Microsoft Word while two others were edited with paper and pen. The in-text comments in both modes resembled each other in number, in area, and in the nature of distribution. Students’ end comments also maintained similar sentence structures, rhetorical styles, and organizational strategies. At the same time, the survey results revealed that students had no overt preference between the modes. The project found that the students gave more peer comments when ACMC was first introduced in the class, but this effect faded quickly. It is therefore suggested that the students’ curiosity regarding this “new experience,” rather than the mode difference, would stimulate higher motivation and greater participation in peer editing situations.
Open and anonymous peer review in a digital online environment compared in academic writing context
Innovative language teaching and learning at university: Enhancing participation and collaboration , 2016
This study compares the impact of ‘open’ and ‘anonymous’ peer feedback as an adjunct to teacher-mediated feedback in a digital online environment utilising data gathered on an academic writing course at a Turkish university. Students were divided into two groups with similar writing proficiencies. Students peer reviewed papers either anonymously or openly, then resubmitted them. The lecturer provided feedback and students again resubmitted their assignments. Finally, students submitted a reflection paper on how or whether they benefited from both peer and teacher-mediated feedback. Findings provide evidence for the positive contribution of multiple anonymous peer feedback in a digital online environment towards improved academic writing skills.