Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge for the New Sciences: The example of biotechnology (original) (raw)
Related papers
BIOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: TOPICS OF INTEREST TO STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
This paper presents the findings of a survey that investigates the biotechnology topics of interest according to students and teachers for inclusion in biology lessons and reports on the similarities and differences in teachers' and students' biotechnology topics of interest. The study is of significance as biotechnology has been identified as a key area of technological and economic importance worldwide yet there is scant literature relating to teachers' and students' interests concerning biotechnology education topics. 500 students and their 15 teachers completed the survey. Interviews were conducted with 3 teachers and 60 students. Responses indicate there is a mismatch in the interests of students and teachers, and what they perceive as being possible topics for inclusion in biology and biotechnology lessons. Where teachers are provided with the freedom to design and assess their own units of work, this mismatch of interests causes problems. The study found students withdrawing from biology courses in post compulsory settings due to lack of interest, and perceived lack of relevance of the course. It is possible that this lack of agreement on topics of interest is a factor in the world wide decline of enrolments in the sciences.
Elementary education preservice teachers' understanding of biotechnology and its related processes
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2011
This study examined preservice teachers' understanding of biotechnology and its related processes. A sample comprised 88 elementary education preservice teachers at a large university in the Midwest of the USA. A total of 60 and 28 of the participants were enrolled in introductory and advanced science methods courses, respectively. Most participants had taken two integrated science courses at the college level. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which had open-ended items and which required participants to write the definitions and examples of the following terms: biotechnology, genetic engineering, cloning and genetically modified foods. The results indicate that preservice teachers had limited understanding of biotechnology and its related processes. The majority of the preservice teachers provided poor definitions, explanations, and examples of biotechnology, genetic engineering and genetically modified foods. Surprisingly, however, a moderate number of preservice teachers correctly defined cloning and provided correct examples of cloning. Implications for science teacher education, science curriculum, as well as recommendations for further research are discussed.
2009
This paper is based on a project that evaluated the benefits of biotechnology training workshops for its integration into school curriculum that is dependent on teachers' knowledge, their teaching confidence, as well as their opinion towards biotechnology. Teachers, as well as a parallel group comprising of college students, were given pre-and post-training tests to assess changes in their knowledge and opinion about biotechnology. Participant teachers' confidence in teaching biotechnology was also assessed. These evaluations revealed a significant increase in the post-test scores compared to the pre-test for teachers (df = 22, t= 12.706, p<0.0001) and college students (df= 12, t= 5.584, p<0.0001). In addition, the teachers (df= 39, t= 8.078, p<0.0001) as well as the college students (df= 7, t= 4.174, p=0.0042) registered a significant increase in their positive attitude towards biotechnology after the training workshops. Biotechnology teaching confidence of the participant educators also showed a significant increase (df= 35, t= 6.393, p<.0001) after the workshops. However, urban teachers had a significantly greater (df= 34, t=-3.191, p=0.0030) gain of 0.376 in their post-training teaching confidence compared to the 0.145 gain by their rural counterparts. Additionally, a statistically significant (r= 0.868, r-squared= 0.7534, p= .0219) relationship was found between teaching confidence and positive opinion of the teachers regarding biotechnology. Since teachers' pedagogical approach and adoption of biotechnology curriculum is dependent on the above issues, results presented in this study are important for designing future biotechnology training workshops.
Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended
2018
The computer skills present an economic role for all countries both individually and politically in the current globalized world. The development of these skills requests the modernization of scholar and academic educational spaces. This modernization is necessary as it may allow better opportunities for the new generations as well as instruments to face the current social and economic challenges. However, the technology alone does not guarantee improvements in education and will depend on the pedagogical strategies of teaching and learning including the use of it as supporting and teaching tools. On that purpose, the offering of new alternatives for the elaboration and development of new methodological strategies for teaching biotechnology, a strategic worldwide area, is very important. The analysis of online tools in science education showed that they are very concentrated in the areas of basic technological science (eg. physics, chemistry and biology). Despite the closeness, ther...
High-School Teachers' Appropriation of an Innovative Curriculum in Bioinformatics
One of the goals of curriculum developers is to provide learners with opportunities to engage in activities that resemble authentic scientific research. A learning environment (LE) aimed at introducing bioinformatics into a high-school biotechnology majors curriculum through engaging learners in authentic research practices served as the context for this study. A teachers' program aimed at establishing a community of biotechnology teachers who collaborate in implementing the LE was established. One of the goals of the teachers' program was to design an assessment tool for the LE. In this study, we examined how the teachers designed the assessment tool, as a means of probing their knowledge and beliefs in adopting contemporary scientific research into their classroom. The analysis of the assessment tool revealed questions that require the use of conditional knowledge, which is at the heart of performing authentic scientific research. Most of these questions called for coordin...
What do science teachers think biotechnology is? : Does it matter?
2003
What is biotechnology? What do science teachers think biotechnology is? Does it matter? This paper argues that a vital task of the science education community is to fully prepare students to be 'technological citizens'. This means it is important to be clear about what is this thing called biotechnology. This article summarises the views of science teachers, and then suggests how science teachers might tackle the important question of what biotechnology is.
Attitudes and Interests Towards Biotechnology: the Mismatch Between Students and Teachers
Office of Education Research School of Curriculum Faculty of Education, 2009
Increasing the scientific literacy of Australians has become an educational priority in recent times. The 'Science State -Smart State' initiative of the Queensland Government involves an action plan for improving science education that includes a Science for Life action. A desired outcome is for an increased understanding of the natural world so that responsible decisions concerning our future wellbeing can be made in an age of science and technology. Biotechnology is a technology that is having profound impact on our lives. This paper describes how 15-16 year old students and biology teachers revealed a mismatch in both attitudes and interests towards biotechnology between the students and teachers. The findings are of interest as the teachers are writing biotechnology into their work programs in response to new syllabus documents. The teacher's areas of interest did not match those of the students, possibly resulting in a curriculum the teachers want to teach, but the students do not want to learn.