SCHUMPETER’S VIEW ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (original) (raw)
Related papers
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
This paper analyzes Schumpeter’s concept of the entrepreneur in comparison to Kirzner and the Austrian School of Economics. For this purpose, the research uses the original German text as the reference, both the first larger edition of 1911 and the later shorter editions (mainly the seventh edition of 1987, which is an unaltered reprint of the fourth edition of 1934). To elaborate on the differences and similarities between Schumpeter and the Austrian approach, the study focuses on the aspects of equilibrium, discovery, speculation, capital, profit, institutions, and development. The analysis shows how the entrepreneur acts as the motor of economic development and how profit and profit expectations serve as the motifs of entrepreneurial action – both for the pioneer of innovation and the imitators. Different from the Austrian School, Schumpeter applies the concept of equilibrium in the neoclassical sense as the starting point of his dynamic analysis. The Schumpeterian entrepreneur i...
SCHUMPETERIAN ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY: EVOLUTION AND RELEVANCE
2019
This article sheds light on the Schumpeterian entrepreneurship in the historical and contemporary context, J.A. Schumpeter (1883-1950) propounded a theory of entrepreneurship which was at quite variance with the then commonly accepted Marshallian entrepreneurship theory of entrepreneurship as establishment and successful or profitable organization of business organizations. As against this, Schumpeter's entrepreneurship theory associates entrepreneurship not only with organizations of businesses, but also with Innovations or continuous business development. Schumpeter costs and entrepreneurship as the central factor of economic development. The result is not a doom of capitalism foreseen by least Marx, but a progressive free-enterprise system. Thus, it is the human factor which emerges as the dominant factor in business and economic development. The theory is of contemporary relevance, as evident from the current entrepreneurship and micro enterprises to combat multiple socioeconomic problems.
J. A. Schumpeter, a Theorist of Innovation and a Historian of Economic Science
6th LIMEN Conference Proceedings (part of LIMEN conference collection)
The paper commemorates the 70th anniversary of the death of Joseph Alois Schumpeter, the world-renowned economist of Czech-Austrian origin and creator of innovation theory. It analyses Schumpeter’s work from the perspective of two aspects, complementing each other in his work: historical economic analysis and entrepreneurial innovation theory. The introduction reveals the genesis of his relation to enterprise, innovation, and the historical economics concept. The historical approach to economics appears in his scientific works at the time of his work at the European universities in Chernivtsi, Graz and Bonn, as well as in his later work at Harvard University. The paper also studies the rise of his innovation theory, first appearing during his work in Graz, Styria, and its gradual reflection in his professional work. The paper shows how these approaches merge in his economic teaching, which is very specific and includes both purely economic and technological and social aspects.
Entrepreneurship, Economic Evolution, and the End of Capitalism: Reconsidering Schumpeter's Thesis
Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2009
This paper seeks to explore and to critically evaluate, from an economic standpoint, Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of the decline of capitalism, as put forward in his Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. It begins by exploring and criticizing Schumpeter’s entrepreneurial theory, and then explains how this flawed theory led to Schumpeter’s conclusion vis-à-vis capitalist evolution into socialism. It then introduces into the theory of capitalist evolution an uncertainty-bearing entrepreneur, and re-examines the theory on this basis, both in general and, in the appendix, for the specific case of artificial increases in the supply of bank credit. The conclusion reached is that Schumpeter’s argument cannot hope to explain the decline of capitalism into socialism. However, while not valid for a truly capitalist system, Schumpeter’s theory is nevertheless applicable to an interventionist economy.
Schumpeter's innovations as the main factor of economic development: [preprint]
2017
This paper gives arguments the powerful innovation activities ensure a rapid economic development o f the countries. It is shown the recent facts confirm the Schumpeter's theory o f economic development and it means that only innovation activities can provide the real economic development. Author concentrates attention on the conceptual meaning o f Schumpeter's innovations as an isolated factor o f economic development which creates a new added value and which may become a kind o f 'a stem cell' o f the new mainstream o f economic theory as it was pu t forward by Schumpeter. The paper considers hypothesis that disregard o f phenomenon o f "innovation" as exogenous isolated factor o f economic development led to the arising gap between the fundamental economic theory (mainstream) and the real innovation processes o f modern economic life. The distinction o f Schumpeter’s theoretical approach from Neoclassical logic lies in its recognition o f the inner force...
The Creative Destruction of Economic Development: The Schumpeterian Entrepreneur
The subject of the entrepreneur in economic theory has mostly been examined in terms of development. Schumpeter, who argued that the neoclassical economic theory could not explain the powers of the economic change due to its static base, took a different position by arguing the necessity of a dynamic theory. Schumpeter identified the entrepreneur as essential element of the dynamic theory of economic change. To Schumpeter, the major role of the entrepreneur is to realize new combinations or innovations that ensure economic change. The primary objective of this study is to explore the individual (psychological) and leadership (sociological) characteristics of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur, who leads to creative destruction via the new combinations in the capitalist system; to put forth his difference from other economic actors and to demonstrate his role in the future (the collapse) of capitalism.
Enterpreneurship and innovation activites in the schumpeterian lines
2004
The importance of diffusion of technology for economic growth has been emphasised by economic literature. Much of the recent work on economic growth can be viewed as refining the basic economic insights of classical economists. The recent debate on the determinants of output growth has concentrated mainly on the role of knowledge, typically produced by a specific sector of the economy, and furthermore in the role of entrepreneurship and the implications on economic growth. This paper attempts to examine the role of entrepreneurship, and those of innovation activities (technical change, research and development and diffusion of technology) and the effects of output growth, according to the Schumpeterian lines. Following on the Schumpeterian tradition, this paper starts from the recognition that there are two main patterns of innovations: the first one is the creative destruction pattern and the second one is a creative accumulation pattern. Also, it emphasizes the role of entrepreneu...
Journal of Insurance and Financial Management
This paper provides a multifaceted review and analysis of Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development and specifically the creative destruction effect intertwined with the business cycles, and their effectiveness in explaining the long-run economic growth by first, looking into the main features of this theory; second, comparing the fundamental similarities and differences of Schumpeter theory with respect to Marxism and Keynesianism, third; a comparison of "Schumpeter" effect vs. the "refugee" effect in recently published researches, and finally, the relationship of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian opportunities in modern entrepreneurship.
The Theory of Economic Development of J.A. Schumpeter: Key Features
2016
This paper comprises translation into English the preface of Iurii Bazhal to the first Ukrainian edition of Joseph Schumpeter’s famous fundamental book “The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle” that was translated in Ukrainian and published in 2011 in commemoration of its 100th anniversary. The paper reveals the contemporary significance of this classical book as the challenger on replacing the neoclassical approaches in capacity to become the mainstream of modern economic theory. It is shown the Schumpeter’s approach gives a new vision of driving forces for economic development where a crucial conceptual place belongs to category the innovation. Second part of the paper reviews modern Neo-Schumpeterian approaches which have substantiated the importance of the structural innovation technological change of national economy for economic development. The government must permanently analyze a compliance of the actual...