The impact of money on the development of fourteenth-century scientific thought (original) (raw)
Related papers
Studium, 2012
At Lisbon in the 1630s a Jesuit of english birth, Ignace Stafford (1599-1642), wrote a thick treatise on calculating instruments, among them Gunter's sector, while he was a teacher of the 'Aula da esfera' attached to the Society's college. Gunter had published his book on a sector equipped with recently developed logarithmic scales at London in 1623. While Stafford may have been the first person to routinely deal with logarithms on the Iberian peninsula, he does not seem to be the first one introducing the use of the sector. It appears that earlier versions of this instrument had some currency already under the name of 'pantometra'. This article is based on a close reading of Stafford's arithmetical treatise that seeks to make visible different kinds of distances in communicating knowledge, as well as the interplay of distancing and approaching. Paying attention to the various kinds of distances involved, will contribute to a better understanding of the historical contingencies that shaped this particular work on arithmetic and mathematical instruments. As a conclusion, I briefly consider the impact of varying distances on the circulation of knowledge.
ARCHIWUM HISTORII FILOZOFII I MYŚLI SPOŁECZNEJ • ARCHIVE OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL THOUGHT, 2017
The paper deals with early medieval mathematics (mainly arithmetic) and presents mathematical knowledge as an important tool for human way to God’s wisdom. The aim of this paper is focused on the definitions of the subject of arithmetic in early medieval texts created between the late 4th and early 7th century. The aim is to highlight the fact that the traditional definitions of a number (i.e., the subject of arithmetic) correspond with the appropriate topics which exist within arithmetic. If a number is characterised as a discrete quantity, it refl ects the classification and typological surveys of the mathematical properties of numbers. If a number is defined as a collection of units, this definition refers to the issue of fi gural numbers, whereas if the number is marked as the quantity that emerges and then returns to the unit, it is possible to detect the themes of numerical sequences and ratios, including their transfers.
Money, Measurement, and Quantification
Marx: Key Concepts, 2024
Against the widespread notion in Marxism and in bourgeois economic theory alike that money is a means of exchange and a medium for the exchange of commodities, it is shown that Marx's development of the monetary functions develops the capitalist concept of money as a technique of quantification qua measurement. Money is not a means of commodity exchange, but this is precisely the semblance that money produces and which has led to the myth in Marxism and in bourgeois economic theory that capitalist society is based on the exchange of commodities. However, money does not exchange commodities, it realizes commodities as “products of capitals” (Marx), and money itself was invested in the elements of this commodity production. In short, money, in the form of commodity mediation, measures in commodities what its alienation into the elements of their production: labor power and capitalist means of production, has been worth. Money's functions on the one hand, the valorization of value through labor power and the forms of capital on the other, are thus to be developed as a process of valorization which measures itself by the self-relation of money's capital form.
"Roman Money and Numerical Practice"
Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire, 2013
This paper addresses the intersection of money and number in the Roman Empire. I trace two main contexts of numerical practice. These were linked to the different physical forms in which money was expressed, specifically coins and written units of account. Uses of number related to coins tended to foreground singular amounts and lack of numerical manipulation, suggesting a simple numeracy based on low, round, or repetitive numbers and counting. Amounts in written money of account, sestertii, could be quite round as well, but a different set of numerical practices also took shape here, centered on forms of calculation such as the abacus or finger numbers, and on the use of written tables and fractions. Money in written units of account was conceived in ways similar to other units of measure: as a mass and a single number to be manipulated through specific numerical practices, especially fractional division. It was conceptually related to the categories of transactions that required such divisions, including inheritance, property, and legal loans.
Mathematical Meditations: Revisiting Moral Practice in the Sciences of the Classical Age
Annales (English ed.), 2012
To what extent did scholars use science to pursue the good life in the seventeenth century? How to articulate the Scientific Revolution with ethical questions? These are the questions at the core of the investigation led by the historian of science Matthew Jones in his bookThe Good Life in the Scientific Revolution. At first glance, his project is simply an extension of research on the social history of truth that has encouraged historians for two decades to decipher the moral norms that gave credit to the use and production of scientific knowledge. Civility, politeness, honor led to specific research that highlighted the cultural and social context surrounding the practices of scientific innovation in the Classical Age. This book deepens these questions by asking how mathematical practices were considered moral reflections. This article will discuss the contribution of this book by first examining the three attempts at experimenting mathematical morals led by Descartes, Pascal and ...
The Oxford Calculatores, Quantification of Qualities, and Aristotle's Prohibition of Metabasis
Vivarium, 1986
When Walter de Merton founded Merton College in 1264, he sought to provide a residence hall for Arts students intending to proceed to the Faculty of Theology at Oxford. Nevertheless, with the exception of Thomas Bradwardine, Merton scholars from the first half of the fourteenth century have achieved widespread fame not for their achievements in sacred theology, but rather for their contributions in the fields of natural philosophy and mathematics. The precise nature of the Mertonian achievement is a topic which has been discussed at great length during the past seventy-five years, and a subject into which this paper will not venture. Instead, its focus will be Mertonian methodology and in particular the relationship between the Mertonians' work and a problem first discussed by Aristotle in his Posterior Analytics.