THE RECEPTION OF EURIPIDES' 'THE BACCHAE', PH.D. THESIS, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, LONDON 2005. (original) (raw)

This thesis aims to recount the performance history of Euripides’ Bakkhai with special reference to nine eminent productions of the 20th century. First, I deal with methodological issues on how one gathers together the pieces of evidence from an ‘invisible’ performance. Given that the Bakkhai was only revived in the 20th century, the review of its textual reception in Chapter 1 covers the gap between the textual and the theatrical re-usage of the play. Moreover, to review the literature would prove that there is indeed a structural model already inbuilt in the text and subsequently applied to performance not necessarily as a footnote to classicist theories. Chapter 2 retells the stage history of the Bakkhai through nine of the least documented productions of this ‘forgotten’ Euripidean tragedy. My Conclusions decipher the structural model of the Bakkhai and provide an explanation for its ‘otherness’ as a tragedy intended for the theatre of the mise-en-scène.

‘Sing Evohe! Three twentieth-century operatic versions of Euripides’ Bacchae’ in Peter Brown & Suzana Ograjenšek (edd.) Ancient Drama in Music for the Modern Stage (OUP: Oxford, 2010) 320-39.

This chapter explores the receptions of Hellenism in the twentieth century, particularly its religious, psychological, aesthetic, and political connotations, by focusing on three operatic adaptations of The Bacchae, Karol Szymanowski’s King Roger, Egon Wellesz’s Die Bakchantinnen, and Hans Werner Henze’s The Bassarids, to a libretto by W. H. Auden and Chester Kallman.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.