Measurement properties of the ASAS Health Index: results of a global study in patients with axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2016
Background: The impact of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is considerable in many aspects of the life. Over the last decades, many efforts have been conducted to develop useful tools for the evaluation of disease activity. However, since the development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI), no specific freely questionnaire to describe the overall picture of impairments, limitations and restrictions in activities or social partecipation were available. The aims of this study were to test the feasibility, reliability, and construct validity of the ASAS HI, in order to compare its clinimetric properties with the current available measures of disease activity, functional limitation and health status assessments in patients with axSpA. Methods: A cohort of 140 consecutive axSpA has been the object of study. The feasibility has been determined by the percentage of patients who were able to complete the questionnaire by themselves and by the time employed to fill the ASAS HI. The reliability has been evaluated performing a test-retest of the questionnaire within a week. The construct validity was examined in three ways. First, we examined construct convergent validity by correlating the scores of the ASAS HI with the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP/ESR, the Simplified Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (SASDAS), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scale (ASQoL) and the EuroQoL Five Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D). Secondly, we have created patient groups based on the patients' activity ranks (ASDAS-CRP and SASDAS categorisation) within the cohort to assess discriminative accuracy. Additionally, to distinguish patients with active and non-active disease and to assess their respective cutoff points values, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used. Thirdly, we analyzed the contribution of demographic (age, sex, and disease duration) and clinical variables (number of comorbidity and disease activity by ASAS-CRP) to the attainment of an ASAS HI condition by stepwise logistic regression.
Defining functioning categories in axial Spondyloarthritis: the role of the ASAS Health Index
Rheumatology international, 2017
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is an inclusive questionnaire, able to describe the total impairments and restrictions due to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Considering the relationship between ASAS HI and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP, the aim of this study is to establish the ASAS HI cut-off values for functioning categories employing the ASDAS-CRP disease activity states in axSpA patients. ASAS HI and ASDAS-CPR were obtained from 140 consecutive axSpA patients, divided in the four ASDAS-CRP disease activity categories. High and very high disease activity were considered together. The ASAS HI cut-offs were obtained from the arithmetic mean, rounded off to the closest whole number, of the 75th percentile mean value of a lower rank and the 25th percentile mean value of the adjacent higher rank. This approach was applied in the transition from inactive disease and moderate disease activity, and in the ...
Clinical utility of the new ASAS criteria for spondyloarthritis and the disease activity score
Current rheumatology reports, 2011
The advent of new therapeutic agents that are efficacious in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and related spondyloarthropathies has highlighted important unmet needs in our understanding of these conditions. Chief among these is the possibility of making a diagnosis at the early, nonradiographic phase, when the burden of disease is substantial and comparable to that of more advanced stages. The new Assessments in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria provide a unique tool to allow research standardization in this area and may also be of clinical utility. The development of the disease activity index ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) aims to provide a composite measure that can discriminate and show sensitivity to change while incorporating measurable biomarkers. Both instruments represent a major step forward in the research field of spondyloarthritis, although further validation is now required.
Rheumatology International, 2020
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is used as a new instrument in measuring the function, disability and health of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, the real-world evidence of ASAS HI is very limited. In the present study, our objective is to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of ASAS HI in the real-world setting as well as comparing ASAS HI with the current instruments to assess the construct validity and determine the cutoff points in patients with both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). A total of 991 patients with axSpA who fulfilled either the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA (axSpA) or the Modified New York Criteria (mNY) for AS were recruited from the Biologic and targeted Synthetic antirheumatic drugs Registry (BioStaR) SpA. The construct validity of ASAS HI against the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional index (BASFI) was performed. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, the cutoff points were calculated. Of all the recruited patients, 851 (85.9%) were AS and 140 (14.1%) were nr-axSpA. The difference in the mean ASAS HI scores of the patients with AS and the ones with nr-axSpA were not statistically significant (6.12 ± 4.29 and 6.42 ± 4.86, respectively). The mean ASAS HI score was significantly higher in females and small city residents. The ASAS HI had a strong construct validity against ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI and BASFI. A cutoff point of ≤ 4 was determined to discriminate good and moderate, as well as ≥ 12 to discriminate moderate and poor health status. In conclusion, ASAS HI is a reliable instrument to evaluate health and functioning for both patients with AS and nr-axSpA in clinical practice.
Current rheumatology reports, 2015
Classification criteria should facilitate selection of similar patients for clinical and epidemiologic studies, therapeutic trials, and research on etiopathogenesis to enable comparison of results across studies from different centers. We critically appraise the validity and performance of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). It is still debatable whether all patients fulfilling these criteria should be considered as having true axSpA. Patients with radiographically evident disease by the ASAS criteria are not necessarily identical with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as classified by the modified New York criteria. The complex multi-arm selection design of the ASAS criteria induces considerable heterogeneity among patients so classified, and applying them in settings with a low prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) greatly increases the proportion of subjects falsely classified as suffering f...
Developing and validating an index for measuring health in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2010
Objectives. The impact of disease on functioning is the essential information for clinicians when reporting on health problems of individuals. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is a comprehensive and universally accepted model to classify and describe functioning, disability and health in a systematic way. The objective of this article is to outline the development and validation of a health index for patients with AS based on the ICF as a use case. Methods. The project is a combined effort of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society, the ICF Research Branch of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaboration Centre of the Family of International Classifications and the WHO. There are five steps in the development and validation of the health index for patients with AS: (i) development of an item pool; (ii) identification of candidate items; (iii) item selection; (iv) item reduction; and (v) creation of a final version. Consensus about items that have to be part will be reached in a final consensus conference. Results. During a meeting in February 2009, we coordinated the development process of the health index for patients with AS. The results of this investigation will be the health index for patients with AS. Conclusion. The goal of developing a health index for patients with AS based on the ICF is very much in line with the broader goal of the WHO to define health indices to ensure the comparability of them within the framework of the ICF.
Clinical Rheumatology
Objective To validate a Spanish-language translation of the ASAS Heath-Index (ASAS-HI) testing its reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in Colombian-patients with spondyloarthritis. Methods Translation was done following a forward-backward procedure. Patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria for either axial or peripheral-SpA participated. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in patients without treatment changes. In patients who required a therapeutic intervention, responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean (SRM). Construct validity was evaluated by Spearman correlation. Internal consistency (Cronbachs-α) and discriminative ability of the ASAS-HI were assessed. Results Fifty patients were included: 54% male, mean (SD) age 44.8(13.1), symptom duration 15.8(9.7) years, BASDAI 4.6(2.2), BASFI 4.7(2.5), ASDAS-CRP 2.2(1.0). AxSpA was established in 44 patients (AS=30, nr-axSpA=14) and pSpA in 6. The score of the ASAS-HI was 8.2(5.1). The test-retest reliability was good with an ICC of 0.84. SRM was 2.58 (1.75-3.37) in 10 patients with any intervention and 2.94 (2.13-4.24) for 7 patients starting TNF-blockers. Construct validity showed a good correlation between ASAS-HI and pain, BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS (r≥0.60). A high internal consistency was found with a Cronbachs-α of 0.91. ASAS-HI discriminated well between patients with different stages of disease activity (BASDAI and ASDAS). Those with higher disease activity had higher ASAS-HI scores. Conclusion The Spanish-language translation of the ASAS-HI has proven to be psychometrically valid for Colombian-patients with SpA. This version is available to evaluate the state of health and functioning in these patients and can be used in clinical practice.
Arthritis research & therapy, 2017
In this study, we sought to compare the performance of spondyloarthritis (SpA) classification criteria sets in an international SpA cohort with patients included from five continents around the world. Data from the (ASAS) COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis (ASAS-COMOSPA) study were used. ASAS-COMOSPA is a multinational, cross-sectional study with consecutive patients diagnosed with SpA by rheumatologists worldwide. Patients were classified according to the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG), modified European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (mESSG), Amor, modified Amor, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA), ASAS peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Overlap between the classification criteria sets was assessed for patients with and without back pain. Furthermore, patients fulfilling different arms of the ASAS axSpA criteria (imaging arm, clinical ...
Rheumatology, 2014
Objective. The objective of this study was to analyse the performance of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for the classification of SpA in early SpA clinics. Methods. We used a cross-sectional study of patients referred to early SpA units within the ESPERANZA programme (a Spanish nationwide health management programme designed to provide excellence in diagnosis and care for early SpA). Patients were eligible if they were <45 years of age and had any of the following: (i) a 2-year history of inflammatory back pain; (ii) back or joint pain with psoriasis, anterior uveitis, radiographic sacroiliitis, family history of SpA or positive HLA-B27; or (iii) asymmetric arthritis. We excluded patients for whom imaging (X-rays/MRI) or HLA-B27 results were not available. We analysed the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of different classification criteria sets, taking the rheumatologist's opinion as the gold standard. Results. The analysis included 775 patients [mean age 33 (S.D. 7) years; 55% men; mean duration of symptoms 11 (S.D. 6) months]; SpA was diagnosed in 538 patients (69.5%). A total of 274 (67.9%) patients with chronic back pain met the ASAS axial criteria, 76 (56.3%) patients with arthritis but not chronic back pain fulfilled the ASAS criteria for peripheral SpA and 350 (65.1%) fulfilled all the ASAS criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the ASAS criteria set were 65% and 93%, respectively (axial criteria: sensitivity 68%, specificity 95%). The sensitivity and specificity for the ESSG and Amor criteria were 58% and 90% and 59% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion. Despite performing better than the Amor or ESSG criteria, the ASAS criteria may be limited to detection of early forms, particularly in populations in which MRI is not extensively available or in populations with a low prevalence of HLA-B27.