Cytokine gene transfer in tumor inhibition and tumor therapy: where are we now? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Efficacy of cytokine gene transfection may differ for autologous and allogeneic tumour cell vaccines
Whole tumour cells are a logical basis for generating immunity against the cancers they comprise or represent. A number of human trials have been initiated using cytokine-transfected whole tumour cells of autologous (patient-derived) or allogeneic [major histocompatibility complex (MHC)disparate] origin as vaccines. Although precedent exists for the ef®cacy of autologous-transfected cell vaccines in animal models, little preclinical evidence con®rms that these ®ndings will extrapolate to allogeneic-transfected cell vaccines. In order to address this issue a murine melanoma cell line (K1735) was transfected to secrete interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7 or granulocyte±macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF); cytokines currently in use in trials. The ef®cacy of these cells as irradiated vaccines was tested head-to-head in syngeneic (C3H) mice and in MHC-disparate (C57BL/6) mice, the former being subsequently challenged with K1735 cells and the latter with naturally cross-reactive B16-F10 melanoma cells. Whilst the GM-CSF-secreting vaccine was the most effective at generating protection in C3H mice, little enhancement in protection above the wild-type vaccine was seen with any of the transfections for the allogeneic vaccines, even though the wild-type vaccine was more effective than the autologous B16-F10 vaccine. Anti-tumour cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity was detected in both models but did not correlate well with protection, whilst in vitro anti-tumour interferon-c (IFN-c) secretion tended to be higher following the GM-CSF-secreting vaccine. Cytokine transfection of vaccines generally increased anti-tumour CTL activity and IFN-c secretion (T helper type 1 response). Further studies in other model systems are required to con®rm this apparent lack of bene®t of cytokine transduction over wild-type allogeneic vaccines, and to determine which in vitro assays will correlate best with protection in vivo.
Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)
The authors have investigated a new way of combining cytokines with tumor cells to prepare anticancer vaccines. This method may offer an alternative to gene therapy approaches. It consists in anchoring recombinant cytokines to the cell membrane. Attachment is mediated by the transmembrane domain of diphtheria toxin (T) genetically fused to the cytokine and is triggered by an acid pH pulse. The authors found that the fusion protein T-hIL-2 anchored to the surface of tumor cells retained its IL-2 activity while remaining exposed for several days. Interestingly, vaccination of mice with these modified tumor cells induced a protective antitumor immunity mediated by tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. This procedure presents several advantages as compared with the conventional approaches based on the transfection of tumor cells with cytokine genes. It does not require the culture of tumor cells from the patients and the selection of transfected clones, it eliminates the safety proble...
Gene Modification Strategies to Induce Tumor Immunity
2005
strategies to correct deficiencies in the response against cancer. The following provides a review of ge-Cancer Immunology Program Peter MacCallum Cancer Center netic intervention strategies to overcome existing limitations of immune defenses at five crucial stages of East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia the adaptive immune response ) and discusses how these might be integrated to develop improved therapies for cancer.
Immunotherapy. I: Cytokine gene transfer strategies
Cancer metastasis reviews
The cytokine approach to gene therapy of cancer stems from early studies of direct, repeated injection of recombinant cytokines at the tumor site, and extension of the bystander effect that enables a few cytokine gene transduced cells in a tumor to bring about its total destruction. This effect can be extended through the immune system, since cytokine-activated regression of a small mass of tumor cells can afford systemic protection. Transduced cells used as a vaccine provide a local concentration of both cytokine and tumor antigens. Cytokines sustain antigen uptake and presentation by increasing the immunogenic potential of the environment through the recruitment of antigen presenting cells and leukocytes, and activation of a cascade of events which amplify and tone up the efficacy of a vaccine. The promises and difficulties of this approach are discussed by considering what is still missing from experimental studies and what can best be done as soon as possible in animals and huma...
Somatic gene therapy for cancer: the utility of transferrinfection in generating ‘tumor vaccines’
Gene, 1993
The last few years have seen the development of a branch of somatic gene therapy which aims at strengthening the immune surveillance of the body, leading to eradication of disseminated cancer tumor cells and occult micrometastases after surgical removal of the primary tumor. Such a tumor vaccination protocol calls for cultivation of the primary tumor tissue and the insertion of one of three types of genes into the isolated cultured tumor cells followed by irradiation of the transfected or transduced cells to render them incapable of further proliferation. The cells so treated constitute the 'tumor vaccine'. A review of the literature suggests that for mouse models, in the initial period after inoculation, rejection of the tumor cells is usually effected by non-T-cell immunity, whereas the long-term systemic immune response is based on cytotoxic T-cells. High expression of the gene inserted into the tumor cells may be critical for the success of the vaccination procedure. Examples are given which indicate that transferrinfection, a procedure to introduce genes by adenovirus-augmented receptor-mediated endocytosis, meets some important prerequisites for successful application of this type of gene therapy.
Antigens and Cytokine Genes in Antitumor Vaccines
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2006
Studies against cancer, including clinical trials, have shown that a correct activation of the immune system can lead to tumor rejection whereas incorrect signaling results in no positive effects or even anergy. We have worked assuming that two signals, GM-CSF (granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factor) and tumor antigens are necessary to mediate an antitumor effective response. To study which is the ideal temporal sequence for their administration, we have used a murine model of antimelanoma vaccine employing whole B16 tumor cells or their membrane protein antigens (TMPs) in combination with gm-csf transfer before or after the antigen delivery. Our results show that: (i) When gm-csf tisular transfection is performed before TMP delivery, a tumor growth inhibition is observed, but with a limit effect when administering high antigen doses; in contrast, when signals are inverted, the limited effect is lost and greater antitumor efficacy is obtained. (ii) A similar behavior, but with stronger positive results, is observed employing gm-csf transfection and whole tumor cells as antigens. While negative results are obtained with gm-csf before cells, the best results (total survival of treated mice) are obtained when GM-CSF is administered in transfected cells. We conclude that optimal antitumoral response can be obtained when the antigen signal is given before (or simultaneous with) GM-CSF production, while the inversion of the signals could result in the undesired inhibition or anergy of the immune response.