Media and War Events: the Influence of Media Information about Kosovo war (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sociological Evaluation of Media Representaions of War
Wars have taken place throughout history, yet media coverage of recent conflicts like the War on Terror (The Independent, 2014), conflict in Syria (BBC, 2014) and the Crimean War (The Economist, 2014) persist in displaying culturally biased reports of events, suggesting that little improvement in this area has taken place in this area of media. This essay shall cover possible reasons for this, and also explore which groups are most likely to be affected by such news reports.
THE KOSOVO WAR IN MEDIA: BETWEEN WAR JOURNALISM AND FOREIGN POLICY OF NATO MEMBERS
Significant links between the media and war have been identified for well over a century. Media often plays a key role in today's conflict. Basically, their role can take two different and opposed forms. Either the media takes an active part in the conflict and has responsibility for the increased violence, or stays independent and out of the conflict, thereby contributing to the resolution of conflict and alleviation of violence. Indeed, throughout the Yugoslav crisis of the 1990s, it often seemed that the media were dictating policy to Western governments. The implications of the conflict were broad and did not exhaust themselves in its military aspects. A key player in the conflict was the media, both the tightly controlled media in Yugoslavia, which came under increasing pressure in the months before the Kosovo war, and the Western media, largely unaware of the background to the conflict. The aim of this work is to show the media coverage on the Kosovo war. Although, how much influenced the foreign policies of states that have to find the solutions? The study includes the research done on Balkans (including Turkey), European and American Press.
Kultura 93/94, 1994
This paper represents a piece of research into the question of the social (mis)uses of media. It delivers new insights and open up new questions, because it takes in consideration in the same time the creator and the user of media messages, and especially transmitters and interpreters of media messages. Although usually the political analysis of media emphasized the importance of "news" and information programs, we want to show how important is general media message, even transmitted through spots, music TV, drama or even art and cultural programming.
CONSTRUCTING REALITIES ON WAR IN PRINT MEDIA DISCOURSE
The paper deals with an analysis of the reporting of two Montenegrin daily newspapers (Pobjeda and Dan) on NATO airstrikes on Yugoslavia in 1999, an event that still has a huge impact on the political scene of Montenegro. The analysis was based on van Dijk's theory on news schemata and Fairclough's and van Dijk's approaches to critical discourse analysis. The analysis has shown that the two analysed dailies, due to their different political and ideological orientations, created two different 'realities' of the same event, using different strategies in the text structure at the macro level, the selection of lexical and syntactic elements at the micro level and in the interpretation of events. This type of reporting has had a negative impact on the political scene of Montenegro on both the decisions made on the independence of the country in 2006 and the support for the NATO membership of Montenegro.
Nauka, bezbednost, policija
The text herein is inspired by Hans Magnus Enzensberger and his writings about "nucleated" civil wars initiated by interethnic differences. Placing his thoughts in context of media, he sees those wars as a spectacle which makes the audience perceive it as a moral problem. The paradigm for interpreting these conclusions may also be the influence of media on perception of events in Yugoslavia in 1999. The starting questions are, therefore, directed towards analysing the validity of such conclusions, which we try to do by explaining the nature of relationship between wars and media influence, as well as the origin of stereotypes about the Balkans − their multiplication with start of conflict and influence of the media on it. In doing so, we can also notice the misconceptions and the effects they produced; with parallel analysis of the essential principles of journalistic reporting, but also a clear disregard for them, with the aim to show their causes too. This makes it possible to deduce what was the effect of reporting and how much it led to problem-solving and transformation of the Balkan societies, or it caused new stereotyping and problems. In this way, all the pointlessness of the conflict and NATO's interventions are also demonstrated, and the conclusion of the analysis becomes a confirmation of Enzensberger's thinking.
Sage Publications, 2014
A significant part of a modern war entails the struggle over news frames to influence public opinion. Studying these news frames in a comparative international context may offer insights into the factors behind frame construction. The 2006 Lebanon–Israel war offers a well-defined case for such comparative study. This study examined how mainstream Arab, Israeli and US television networks framed the conflict. It found strong regional framing trends explained as an outcome of the interplay of political, economic and cultural factors that confined each network’s journalistic practices. The trends revealed a strong correlation between Israeli and US news framing, with some exceptions, and a division between two Arab media camps, both of which generally offered framing supportive of Hezbollah.