Child-Turcotte score versus MELD for prognosis in a randomized controlled trial of emergency treatment of bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Transplantation, 2010
Background-Bleeding esophageal varices (BEV) in cirrhosis has been considered an indication for liver transplantation (LT). This issue was examined in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of unselected, consecutive patients with advanced cirrhosis and BEV that compared endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) (n=106) to emergency direct portacaval shunt (EPCS) (n=105). Methods-Diagnostic workup and treatment were initiated within 8 hours. Patients were evaluated for LT on admission and repeatedly thereafter. 96% underwent over 10 years of regular follow-up. The analysis was supplemented by 1300 unrandomized cirrhotic patients who previously underwent portacaval shunt (PCS) with 100% follow-up. Results-In the RCT, long-term bleeding control was 100% following EPCS, only 20% following EST. 3, 5, 10, and 15-year survival rates were 75%, 73%, 46%, and 46% following EPCS, compared to 44%, 21%, 9%, and 9% following EST (p<0.001). Only 13 RCT patients (6%) were ultimately referred for LT mainly because of progressive liver failure; only 7 (3%) were approved for LT and only 4 (2%) underwent LT. 1-and 5-year LT survival rates were 0.68% and 0, compared to 81% and 73% after EPCS. In the 1300 unrandomized PCS patients. 50 (3.8%) were referred and 19 (1.5%) underwent LT. Five-year survival rate was 53% compared to 72% for all 1300 patients. Conclusions-If bleeding is permanently controlled, as occurred invariably following EPCS, cirrhotic patients with BEV seldom require LT. PCS is effective first-line and long-term treatment. Should LT be required in patients with PCS, although technically more demanding, numerous
Egyptian Liver Journal, 2021
Background Despite the great advancement in therapeutic modalities for esophageal varices, early variceal rebleeding still occurs at high rates leading to an exaggeration of the morbidity and mortality for cirrhotic patients, so meticulous follow-up with optimum prediction and proper preventive measures for early variceal rebleeding are mandatory for increasing survival of those patients. In this respect, we evaluated the clinical, laboratory, abdominal ultrasound, and endoscopic criteria of variceal cirrhotic patients as possible risk predictors of early variceal rebleeding after endoscopic control of first variceal bleeding. All included patients were followed up blindly for 12 weeks after endoscopic control of bleeding for ascertainment of first variceal rebleeding. The demographic, clinical, laboratory, abdominal ultrasound, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic criteria were evaluated for all patients at first admission. Results By univariate regression analysis, the statistica...
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014
Background Acute variceal haemorrhage (AVH) is associated with significant mortality. Aims To determine outcome and factors associated with hospital mortality (HM) in patients with AVH admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare outcomes of patients requiring transfer to a tertiary ICU (transfer group, TG) to a local in-patient group (LG). Methods A retrospective study of all adult patients (N = 177) admitted to ICU with AVH from 2000-2008 was performed. Results Median age was 48 years (16-80). Male represented 58%. Median MELD score was 16 (6-39), SOFA score was 8 (6-11). HM was higher in patients who had severe liver disease or critical illness measured by MELD, SOFA, APACHE II scores and number of failed organs (NFO), P < 0.05. Patients with day-1 lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L had increased HM (P < 0.001). MELD score performed as well as APACHE II, SOFA and NFO (P < 0.001) in predicting HM (AUROC = 0.84, 0.81, 0.79 and 0.82, respectively P > 0.05 for pair wise comparisons). Re-bleeding was associated with increased HM (56.9% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.002). The TG (n = 124) had less severe liver disease and critical illness and consequently had lower HM than local patients (32% vs. 57%, P = 0.002). TG patients with ≥2 endoscopies prior to transfer had increased 6-week mortality (P = 0.03). Time from bleeding to transfer ≥3 days was associated with re-bleeding (OR = 2.290, P = 0.043). Conclusions MELD score was comparable to ICU prognostic models in predicting mortality. Blood lactate was also predictive of hospital mortality. Delays in referrals and repeated endoscopy were associated with increased re-bleeding and mortality in this group.
Objective: Esophageal variceal bleeding is the most dangerous complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it is accompanied by high mortality. Their treatment can be complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach. This review examines current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between 1987 and 2015. Relevant articles were identified using the following terms: ‘esophageal variceal bleeding’, ‘portal hypertension’ and ‘complications of liver cirrhosis’. The reference lists of articles identified were also searched for other relevant publications. Inclusion criteria were restricted to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Results: It is currently recommended to combine vasoactive drugs (preferable somatostatin or terlipressin) and endoscopic therapies (endoscopic band ligation as first choice, sclerotherapy if endoscopic band ligation not feasible) for the initial treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis must be regarded as an integral part of the treatment. The use of a Sengstaken–Blakemore tube is appropriate only in cases of refractory bleeding if the above methods cannot be used. An alternative to balloon tamponade may be the installation of self-expandable metal stents. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is an extremely useful technique for the treatment of acute bleeding from esophageal varices. Although most current clinical guidelines classify it as second-line therapy, the Baveno VI workshop recommends early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents within 72 h (ideally524 h) in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding at high risk of treatment failure (e.g. Child–Turcotte–Pugh class C514 points or Child–Turcotte–Pugh class B with active bleeding) after initial pharmacological and endoscopic therapy. Urgent surgical intervention is rarely performed and can be considered only in case of failure of conservative and/or endoscopic therapy and being unable to use a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Among surgical operations described in the literature are a variety of portocaval anastomosis and azygoportal disconnection procedures. Conclusions: To improve the results of treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis who develop acute esophageal variceal bleeding, it is important to stratify patients into risk groups, which will allow one to tailor therapeutic approaches to the expected results.
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2020
Background: The survival of early placement (within 72h after admission) of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (early-TIPS) in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is controversial. Objectives: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess whether early-TIPS could improve survival in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library published before 25 June 2019 for eligible studies that compared early-TIPS with a combination of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and pharmacotherapy in the therapeutic effect in AVB patients. Results: A total of five studies with 1,754 participants were enrolled. The early-TIPS demonstrated a significant improvement in prevention of treatment failure (OR=0.11,95% CI=0.05-0.23), 6-weeks mortality (OR=0.24,95%CI=0.13-0.46), rebleeding within 6 weeks (OR=0.21,95%CI=0.12-0.36), rebleeding within 1 year (OR=0.16,95%CI=0.07-0.36), new or worsening ascites (OR=0.33,95%CI=0.21-0.53), except in encephalopathy (OR=1.29,95%CI=0.996-1.67). For 1-year mortality, a significant prior effect was also observed in early-TIPS (OR=0.64,95%CI=0.46-0.90), and the beneficial effect in Child-Pugh C patients (OR=0.35,95%CI=0.18-0.68) was equal to Child-Pugh B patients (OR=0.34,95%CI=0.25-0.58). No difference in liver transplantation and mortality caused by liver failure was observed. Conclusions: Early covered-TIPS could be recommended for the management of AVB patients in cirrhosis demonstrating a significant improvement in treatment failure, both short-and long-term mortality, rebleeding risk, and new or worsening ascites compared
Annals of Gastroenterology
Background Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (VUGIB) occurs in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, but non-VUGIB (NVUGIB) is not uncommon. We compared the outcomes of VUGIB and NVUGIB in cirrhotic patients. Methods This retrospective study used Nationwide Inpatient Sample employing International Classification of Diseases codes for adult NVUGIB and VUGIB patients. Mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization were compared. Analyses were performed using STATA; proportions and continuous variables were compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test, respectively. Confounding variables were adjusted using propensity matching, multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses. Results Of 2,166,194 cirrhotics, 92,439 had a diagnosis of NVUGIB and 17,620 VUGIB. VUGIB patients had higher rates of mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.69], hemorrhagic shock (aOR 1.84, 95%CI 1.54-2.17) and intensive care unit admission (aOR 2.47, 95%CI 2.18-2.81), greater hospitalization costs ($16,251 vs. $12,295, P<0.001), more need for packed red blood cell transfusion (aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.03-1.22) or endoscopic therapy (aOR 2.71, 95%CI 2.47-2.93), and a longer hospital stay compared to NVUGIB. However, NVUGIB had higher aOR of undergoing diagnostic endoscopy and radiography-guided vessel embolization. There were no differences in the rates of acute kidney injury between the 2 groups. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were independently associated with increased VUGIB mortality. Conclusions VUGIB in patients with cirrhosis is associated with greater hospital costs, mortality, and morbidity burden than NVUGIB. This study provides updated and current knowledge of patient characteristics and differences in outcomes between VUGIB and NVUGIB, required to successfully address the healthcare delivery gaps.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2004
Background: Pleural effusions(PE) complicate cirrhosis in ~5% of patients. Identification of cause and related complications is imperative. Unlike refractory ascites, large-scale studies on interventions for refractory PE are limited. Methods: Consecutive hospitalized cirrhotics having PE were retrospectively analyzed. None had liver transplantation (LT) within 6-month follow-up. We determined safety, efficacy and mortality predictors for PE managed with standard medical treatment(SMT), thoracentesis, catheter drainage and TIPS. Results: Of 1149 cirrhotics with PE(mean Child-Pugh 10.6 ±1.8 and MELD 21.2 ±7.4), 82.6% had hepatic hydrothorax(HH) and 12.3% were suspected tubercular PE(TBPE). Despite comparable HVPG and MELD scores, patients with HH developed more AKI, encephalopathy and septic shock (all P<0.01) on follow up. Among HH, 73.5% were symptomatic, 53.2% isolated right-sided PE and 21.3% had SBE. Presence of SBP[Odd's ratio,OR:4.5] and catheter drainage[OR:2.1] were independent predictors for SBE. In 70.3% of admissions, HH responded to SMT alone, 12.9% required thoracentesis and 11.5% underwent catheter drainage. 51 patients were selected for TIPS [lower mean CTP 9.9±1.6 and MELD score 18.7±5.4]. Despite reduction in pressure gradient from 23.1±3.8 mm Hg to 7.2±2.5 mm Hg, 25 patients had partial response, 10 had complete HH resolution. Major post-TIPS complications were portosystemic encephalopathy(8 patients, 6 resolved) and ischemic hepatitis(4 patients, 2 resolved). Overall, 35.9% patients with HH had 6-month mortality and independent predictors were MELD >25, SBP and septic shock. Conclusion: Refractory PE in cirrhosis requiring interventions including TIPS has poor outcome. Role of hemodynamics in predicting post-TIPS response and complications is limited. Early referral for LT is imperative.